Psychophysical parallelism in the philosophy of G. Deleuze

The distinction between the mind and body, their relatedness and respective properties is perhaps the single most persistent problem that faces philosophical contemplation. Various models have been proposed in order to overcome this gaping duality: idealism, occasionalism, epiphenomenalism, behaviou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ruiz, Martin
Published: University of Warwick 1997
Subjects:
100
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.242085
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-242085
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-2420852018-09-25T03:27:37ZPsychophysical parallelism in the philosophy of G. DeleuzeRuiz, Martin1997The distinction between the mind and body, their relatedness and respective properties is perhaps the single most persistent problem that faces philosophical contemplation. Various models have been proposed in order to overcome this gaping duality: idealism, occasionalism, epiphenomenalism, behaviourism, etc. The model proposed within this thesis corresponds to psychophysical parallelism - a parallelism judged purely phenomenological - wherein mind and body are conceived in terms of two aspects of an unconscious transcendental reality. Historically, philosophy has tended to prioritise one of the aspects over the other: Hegel and Marx serve to illustrate this point. As I will argue throughout this thesis, this transcendental reality - within which we will situate spontaneous creativity - is essentially double and subsists between the two extremes. The consequence of this duplicity is to negate the possibility of any reconciliation into an originary Being, but through which the extremes communicate and pass information. Furthermore, since reality is essentially double, we will be at pains to describe it from two perspectives: from the point of view of language and biology, and thereby avoid the tendency to prioritise. The ontological, therefore, will be described in terms of a virtual or potential being situated in neither the heights nor the depths, but staged upon a surface that slips in between the two extremes. This has the added consequence of grounding ethics in sensibility. However, this is not a reductionist programme, but a theory of the whole which functions in the manner of a cybernetic entity constituted upon fractal sedimentations.100B Philosophy (General)University of Warwickhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.242085http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/104942/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 100
B Philosophy (General)
spellingShingle 100
B Philosophy (General)
Ruiz, Martin
Psychophysical parallelism in the philosophy of G. Deleuze
description The distinction between the mind and body, their relatedness and respective properties is perhaps the single most persistent problem that faces philosophical contemplation. Various models have been proposed in order to overcome this gaping duality: idealism, occasionalism, epiphenomenalism, behaviourism, etc. The model proposed within this thesis corresponds to psychophysical parallelism - a parallelism judged purely phenomenological - wherein mind and body are conceived in terms of two aspects of an unconscious transcendental reality. Historically, philosophy has tended to prioritise one of the aspects over the other: Hegel and Marx serve to illustrate this point. As I will argue throughout this thesis, this transcendental reality - within which we will situate spontaneous creativity - is essentially double and subsists between the two extremes. The consequence of this duplicity is to negate the possibility of any reconciliation into an originary Being, but through which the extremes communicate and pass information. Furthermore, since reality is essentially double, we will be at pains to describe it from two perspectives: from the point of view of language and biology, and thereby avoid the tendency to prioritise. The ontological, therefore, will be described in terms of a virtual or potential being situated in neither the heights nor the depths, but staged upon a surface that slips in between the two extremes. This has the added consequence of grounding ethics in sensibility. However, this is not a reductionist programme, but a theory of the whole which functions in the manner of a cybernetic entity constituted upon fractal sedimentations.
author Ruiz, Martin
author_facet Ruiz, Martin
author_sort Ruiz, Martin
title Psychophysical parallelism in the philosophy of G. Deleuze
title_short Psychophysical parallelism in the philosophy of G. Deleuze
title_full Psychophysical parallelism in the philosophy of G. Deleuze
title_fullStr Psychophysical parallelism in the philosophy of G. Deleuze
title_full_unstemmed Psychophysical parallelism in the philosophy of G. Deleuze
title_sort psychophysical parallelism in the philosophy of g. deleuze
publisher University of Warwick
publishDate 1997
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.242085
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizmartin psychophysicalparallelisminthephilosophyofgdeleuze
_version_ 1718742083158671360