The development of the Russian piano concerto in the nineteenth century

The Russian piano concerto could not have had more inauspicious beginnings. Unlike the symphonic poem (and, indirectly, the symphony)- genres for which Glinka, the so-called 'Father of Russian Music', provided an invaluable model: 'Well? It's all in "Kamarinskaya", just...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Norris, Jeremy Paul
Published: University of Sheffield 1988
Subjects:
800
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.239309
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-239309
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-2393092015-05-02T03:20:16ZThe development of the Russian piano concerto in the nineteenth centuryNorris, Jeremy Paul1988The Russian piano concerto could not have had more inauspicious beginnings. Unlike the symphonic poem (and, indirectly, the symphony)- genres for which Glinka, the so-called 'Father of Russian Music', provided an invaluable model: 'Well? It's all in "Kamarinskaya", just as the whole oak is in the acorn' to quote Tchaikovsky - the Russian piano concerto had no such indigenous prototype. All that existed to inspire would-be concerto composers were a handful of inferior potpourris and variations for piano and orchestra and a negligible concerto by Villoing dating from the 1830s. Rubinstein's five concertos certainly offered something more substantial, as Tchaikovsky acknowledged in his First Concerto, but by this time the century was approaching its final quarter. This absence of a prototype is reflected in all aspects of Russian concerto composition. Most Russian concertos lean perceptibly on the stylistic features of Western European composers and several can be justly accused of plagiarism. Furthermore, Russian composers faced formidable problems concerning the structural organization of their concertos, a factor which contributed to the inability of several, including Balakirev and Taneyev, to complete their works. Even Tchaikovsky encountered difficulties which he was not always able to overcome. The most successful Russian piano concertos of the nineteenth century, Tchaikovsky's No.1 in B flat minor, Rimsky-Korsakov's Concerto in C sharp minor and Balakirev's Concerto in E flat, returned to indigenous sources of inspiration: Russian folk song and Russian orthodox chant. As characteristic of nationalist works in general, their contribution to the development of the piano concerto was not profound; nevertheless, they represent a valuable, if numerically•small, addition to the repertory, and laid the foundations of a twentieth-century school of concerto composition, headed by Rachmaninovand Prokofiev, of unparalleled brilliance and virtuosity.800LiteratureUniversity of Sheffieldhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.239309http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1786/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 800
Literature
spellingShingle 800
Literature
Norris, Jeremy Paul
The development of the Russian piano concerto in the nineteenth century
description The Russian piano concerto could not have had more inauspicious beginnings. Unlike the symphonic poem (and, indirectly, the symphony)- genres for which Glinka, the so-called 'Father of Russian Music', provided an invaluable model: 'Well? It's all in "Kamarinskaya", just as the whole oak is in the acorn' to quote Tchaikovsky - the Russian piano concerto had no such indigenous prototype. All that existed to inspire would-be concerto composers were a handful of inferior potpourris and variations for piano and orchestra and a negligible concerto by Villoing dating from the 1830s. Rubinstein's five concertos certainly offered something more substantial, as Tchaikovsky acknowledged in his First Concerto, but by this time the century was approaching its final quarter. This absence of a prototype is reflected in all aspects of Russian concerto composition. Most Russian concertos lean perceptibly on the stylistic features of Western European composers and several can be justly accused of plagiarism. Furthermore, Russian composers faced formidable problems concerning the structural organization of their concertos, a factor which contributed to the inability of several, including Balakirev and Taneyev, to complete their works. Even Tchaikovsky encountered difficulties which he was not always able to overcome. The most successful Russian piano concertos of the nineteenth century, Tchaikovsky's No.1 in B flat minor, Rimsky-Korsakov's Concerto in C sharp minor and Balakirev's Concerto in E flat, returned to indigenous sources of inspiration: Russian folk song and Russian orthodox chant. As characteristic of nationalist works in general, their contribution to the development of the piano concerto was not profound; nevertheless, they represent a valuable, if numerically•small, addition to the repertory, and laid the foundations of a twentieth-century school of concerto composition, headed by Rachmaninovand Prokofiev, of unparalleled brilliance and virtuosity.
author Norris, Jeremy Paul
author_facet Norris, Jeremy Paul
author_sort Norris, Jeremy Paul
title The development of the Russian piano concerto in the nineteenth century
title_short The development of the Russian piano concerto in the nineteenth century
title_full The development of the Russian piano concerto in the nineteenth century
title_fullStr The development of the Russian piano concerto in the nineteenth century
title_full_unstemmed The development of the Russian piano concerto in the nineteenth century
title_sort development of the russian piano concerto in the nineteenth century
publisher University of Sheffield
publishDate 1988
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.239309
work_keys_str_mv AT norrisjeremypaul thedevelopmentoftherussianpianoconcertointhenineteenthcentury
AT norrisjeremypaul developmentoftherussianpianoconcertointhenineteenthcentury
_version_ 1716802016534069248