Short Selling Threats and Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

abstract: This study examines how short selling threats affect firms’ non-generally accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP) reporting quality. From 2005 to 2007, the SEC implemented a Pilot Program under Regulation SHO, in which one-third of the Russell 3000 index stocks were randomly chosen as pi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Liu, Junjun (Author)
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.57257
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-57257
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-572572020-06-02T03:01:24Z Short Selling Threats and Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment abstract: This study examines how short selling threats affect firms’ non-generally accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP) reporting quality. From 2005 to 2007, the SEC implemented a Pilot Program under Regulation SHO, in which one-third of the Russell 3000 index stocks were randomly chosen as pilot stocks and exempted from short-sale price tests. As a result, short selling threats increased considerably for pilot stocks. Using difference-in-differences tests, I find that pilot firms respond to the increased short selling threats by reducing the use of low-quality non-GAAP exclusions, resulting in an improvement in the quality of overall non-GAAP exclusions. Further tests show that this effect of short selling threats is more pronounced for smaller firms, firms with lower institutional ownership, firms with lower analyst coverage, and firms with lower ratios of fundamental value to market value. These findings suggest short sellers play an important monitoring role in disciplining managers, as evidenced by the non-GAAP reporting choices of managers. Dissertation/Thesis Liu, Junjun (Author) Faurel, Lucile (Advisor) Li, Yinghua (Committee member) Rykaczewski, Maria (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Accounting eng 66 pages Doctoral Dissertation Accountancy 2020 Doctoral Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.57257 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ 2020
collection NDLTD
language English
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic Accounting
spellingShingle Accounting
Short Selling Threats and Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
description abstract: This study examines how short selling threats affect firms’ non-generally accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP) reporting quality. From 2005 to 2007, the SEC implemented a Pilot Program under Regulation SHO, in which one-third of the Russell 3000 index stocks were randomly chosen as pilot stocks and exempted from short-sale price tests. As a result, short selling threats increased considerably for pilot stocks. Using difference-in-differences tests, I find that pilot firms respond to the increased short selling threats by reducing the use of low-quality non-GAAP exclusions, resulting in an improvement in the quality of overall non-GAAP exclusions. Further tests show that this effect of short selling threats is more pronounced for smaller firms, firms with lower institutional ownership, firms with lower analyst coverage, and firms with lower ratios of fundamental value to market value. These findings suggest short sellers play an important monitoring role in disciplining managers, as evidenced by the non-GAAP reporting choices of managers. === Dissertation/Thesis === Doctoral Dissertation Accountancy 2020
author2 Liu, Junjun (Author)
author_facet Liu, Junjun (Author)
title Short Selling Threats and Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
title_short Short Selling Threats and Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
title_full Short Selling Threats and Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
title_fullStr Short Selling Threats and Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Short Selling Threats and Non-GAAP Reporting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
title_sort short selling threats and non-gaap reporting: evidence from a natural experiment
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.57257
_version_ 1719315807969738752