Responsible Governance of Artificial Intelligence: An Assessment, Theoretical Framework, and Exploration

abstract: While artificial intelligence (AI) has seen enormous technical progress in recent years, less progress has occurred in understanding the governance issues raised by AI. In this dissertation, I make four contributions to the study and practice of AI governance. First, I connect AI to the li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Brundage, Miles (Author)
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.55667
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-55667
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-556672020-01-15T03:01:17Z Responsible Governance of Artificial Intelligence: An Assessment, Theoretical Framework, and Exploration abstract: While artificial intelligence (AI) has seen enormous technical progress in recent years, less progress has occurred in understanding the governance issues raised by AI. In this dissertation, I make four contributions to the study and practice of AI governance. First, I connect AI to the literature and practices of responsible research and innovation (RRI) and explore their applicability to AI governance. I focus in particular on AI’s status as a general purpose technology (GPT), and suggest some of the distinctive challenges for RRI in this context such as the critical importance of publication norms in AI and the need for coordination. Second, I provide an assessment of existing AI governance efforts from an RRI perspective, synthesizing for the first time a wide range of literatures on AI governance and highlighting several limitations of extant efforts. This assessment helps identify areas for methodological exploration. Third, I explore, through several short case studies, the value of three different RRI-inspired methods for making AI governance more anticipatory and reflexive: expert elicitation, scenario planning, and formal modeling. In each case, I explain why these particular methods were deployed, what they produced, and what lessons can be learned for improving the governance of AI in the future. I find that RRI-inspired methods have substantial potential in the context of AI, and early utility to the GPT-oriented perspective on what RRI in AI entails. Finally, I describe several areas for future work that would put RRI in AI on a sounder footing. Dissertation/Thesis Brundage, Miles (Author) Guston, David (Advisor) Keeler, Lauren (Committee member) Fisher, Erik (Committee member) Bryson, Joanna (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Social research Political science Artificial intelligence Artificial intelligence Responsible innovation Science and technology policy eng 149 pages Doctoral Dissertation Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology 2019 Doctoral Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.55667 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ 2019
collection NDLTD
language English
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic Social research
Political science
Artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence
Responsible innovation
Science and technology policy
spellingShingle Social research
Political science
Artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence
Responsible innovation
Science and technology policy
Responsible Governance of Artificial Intelligence: An Assessment, Theoretical Framework, and Exploration
description abstract: While artificial intelligence (AI) has seen enormous technical progress in recent years, less progress has occurred in understanding the governance issues raised by AI. In this dissertation, I make four contributions to the study and practice of AI governance. First, I connect AI to the literature and practices of responsible research and innovation (RRI) and explore their applicability to AI governance. I focus in particular on AI’s status as a general purpose technology (GPT), and suggest some of the distinctive challenges for RRI in this context such as the critical importance of publication norms in AI and the need for coordination. Second, I provide an assessment of existing AI governance efforts from an RRI perspective, synthesizing for the first time a wide range of literatures on AI governance and highlighting several limitations of extant efforts. This assessment helps identify areas for methodological exploration. Third, I explore, through several short case studies, the value of three different RRI-inspired methods for making AI governance more anticipatory and reflexive: expert elicitation, scenario planning, and formal modeling. In each case, I explain why these particular methods were deployed, what they produced, and what lessons can be learned for improving the governance of AI in the future. I find that RRI-inspired methods have substantial potential in the context of AI, and early utility to the GPT-oriented perspective on what RRI in AI entails. Finally, I describe several areas for future work that would put RRI in AI on a sounder footing. === Dissertation/Thesis === Doctoral Dissertation Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology 2019
author2 Brundage, Miles (Author)
author_facet Brundage, Miles (Author)
title Responsible Governance of Artificial Intelligence: An Assessment, Theoretical Framework, and Exploration
title_short Responsible Governance of Artificial Intelligence: An Assessment, Theoretical Framework, and Exploration
title_full Responsible Governance of Artificial Intelligence: An Assessment, Theoretical Framework, and Exploration
title_fullStr Responsible Governance of Artificial Intelligence: An Assessment, Theoretical Framework, and Exploration
title_full_unstemmed Responsible Governance of Artificial Intelligence: An Assessment, Theoretical Framework, and Exploration
title_sort responsible governance of artificial intelligence: an assessment, theoretical framework, and exploration
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.55667
_version_ 1719308548626710528