The Dilemma of Violence: Political Conflict, Popular Mobilization, and Foreign Interventions

abstract: Why and when do political actors use violence? This project answers these questions by exploring the dynamics of the interactions between state authorities and political dissidents. Both the state and the dissidents face the dilemma of using violence to achieve their political goals. While...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: RezaeeDaryakenari, SeyedBabak (Author)
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.49392
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-49392
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-493922018-06-22T03:09:39Z The Dilemma of Violence: Political Conflict, Popular Mobilization, and Foreign Interventions abstract: Why and when do political actors use violence? This project answers these questions by exploring the dynamics of the interactions between state authorities and political dissidents. Both the state and the dissidents face the dilemma of using violence to achieve their political goals. While structural factors influence state violence and dissident violence, I contend that we need to examine how the dynamics of the state-dissident interactions shape these actors’ political behavior. This project first asks if nonviolent methods of resistance are effective--and perhaps even more successful than violent methods--why do opposition movements ever resort to violence? I argue that the efficacy of nonviolent resistance changes over time. When the likelihood of demobilization increases, dissident movements doubt the effectiveness of nonviolent resistance and weigh violence as an alternative tactic. The first chapter of this dissertation shows that the failure in expanding the size of a movement over several periods provides increases the risk of demobilization, and so dissident violence. I also argue while the expansion of the movement decreases the risk of dissident violence, a sudden and large expansion in the size of the movement overburdens its monitoring and sanctioning capacities, which raises the risk of dissident violence. These arguments are supported empirically using two different datasets. In the second theoretical part of this project, I examine the effects of foreign interventions on the dynamics of state repression and dissident violence. I find that the diplomatic statements and efforts such as disapproving state behavior, asking for political reform, and threatening to impose economic sanctions and to deploy military forces either did not have a significant effect, or increased state repression and decreased state concession during the Arab Spring. Finally, the last part of this project contributes to the literature on the formal modeling of dissent-repression by developing a recursive model of political violence dynamics. In addition to addressing several drawbacks in the literature, this model endogenizes the mobilization and demobilization of the movement and explains how these changes affect dissident violence. Due to the complexity of the developed mathematical model, I use a computational model to find the optimal outcomes. This computational model also can be used for simulating the state’s and the dissidents’ behavior under different scenarios. Dissertation/Thesis RezaeeDaryakenari, SeyedBabak (Author) Thies, Cameron G. (Advisor) Hechter, Michael N. (Committee member) Siroky, David S. (Committee member) Wood, Reed M. (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Political science Peace studies Civil resistance Mobilization Nonviolent resistance Political conflict Political violence Violent resistance eng 171 pages Doctoral Dissertation Political Science 2018 Doctoral Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.49392 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2018
collection NDLTD
language English
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic Political science
Peace studies
Civil resistance
Mobilization
Nonviolent resistance
Political conflict
Political violence
Violent resistance
spellingShingle Political science
Peace studies
Civil resistance
Mobilization
Nonviolent resistance
Political conflict
Political violence
Violent resistance
The Dilemma of Violence: Political Conflict, Popular Mobilization, and Foreign Interventions
description abstract: Why and when do political actors use violence? This project answers these questions by exploring the dynamics of the interactions between state authorities and political dissidents. Both the state and the dissidents face the dilemma of using violence to achieve their political goals. While structural factors influence state violence and dissident violence, I contend that we need to examine how the dynamics of the state-dissident interactions shape these actors’ political behavior. This project first asks if nonviolent methods of resistance are effective--and perhaps even more successful than violent methods--why do opposition movements ever resort to violence? I argue that the efficacy of nonviolent resistance changes over time. When the likelihood of demobilization increases, dissident movements doubt the effectiveness of nonviolent resistance and weigh violence as an alternative tactic. The first chapter of this dissertation shows that the failure in expanding the size of a movement over several periods provides increases the risk of demobilization, and so dissident violence. I also argue while the expansion of the movement decreases the risk of dissident violence, a sudden and large expansion in the size of the movement overburdens its monitoring and sanctioning capacities, which raises the risk of dissident violence. These arguments are supported empirically using two different datasets. In the second theoretical part of this project, I examine the effects of foreign interventions on the dynamics of state repression and dissident violence. I find that the diplomatic statements and efforts such as disapproving state behavior, asking for political reform, and threatening to impose economic sanctions and to deploy military forces either did not have a significant effect, or increased state repression and decreased state concession during the Arab Spring. Finally, the last part of this project contributes to the literature on the formal modeling of dissent-repression by developing a recursive model of political violence dynamics. In addition to addressing several drawbacks in the literature, this model endogenizes the mobilization and demobilization of the movement and explains how these changes affect dissident violence. Due to the complexity of the developed mathematical model, I use a computational model to find the optimal outcomes. This computational model also can be used for simulating the state’s and the dissidents’ behavior under different scenarios. === Dissertation/Thesis === Doctoral Dissertation Political Science 2018
author2 RezaeeDaryakenari, SeyedBabak (Author)
author_facet RezaeeDaryakenari, SeyedBabak (Author)
title The Dilemma of Violence: Political Conflict, Popular Mobilization, and Foreign Interventions
title_short The Dilemma of Violence: Political Conflict, Popular Mobilization, and Foreign Interventions
title_full The Dilemma of Violence: Political Conflict, Popular Mobilization, and Foreign Interventions
title_fullStr The Dilemma of Violence: Political Conflict, Popular Mobilization, and Foreign Interventions
title_full_unstemmed The Dilemma of Violence: Political Conflict, Popular Mobilization, and Foreign Interventions
title_sort dilemma of violence: political conflict, popular mobilization, and foreign interventions
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.49392
_version_ 1718701847480369152