Experimental Investigation of Typical Aircraft Field Performance Versus Predicted Performance Targets

abstract: This thesis explores the human factors effects pilots have when controlling the aircraft during the takeoff phase of flight. These variables come into play in the transitory phase from ground roll to flight, and in the initiation of procedures to abort a takeoff during the ground run. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Wood, Donald Leland (Author)
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.45483
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-45483
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-454832018-06-22T03:08:44Z Experimental Investigation of Typical Aircraft Field Performance Versus Predicted Performance Targets abstract: This thesis explores the human factors effects pilots have when controlling the aircraft during the takeoff phase of flight. These variables come into play in the transitory phase from ground roll to flight, and in the initiation of procedures to abort a takeoff during the ground run. The FAA provides regulations for manufacturers and operators to follow, ensuring safe manufacture of aircraft and pilots that fly without endangering the passengers; however, details regarding accounting of piloting variability are lacking. Creation of a numerical simulation allowed for the controlled variation of isolated piloting procedures in order to evaluate effects on field performance. Reduced rotation rates and delayed reaction times were found to cause significant increases in field length requirements over values published in the AFM. A pilot survey was conducted to evaluate common practices for line pilots in the field, which revealed minimum regulatory compliance is exercised with little to no feedback on runway length requirements. Finally, observation of pilots training in a CRJ-200 FTD gathered extensive information on typical piloting timings in the cockpit. AEO and OEI takeoffs were observed, as well as RTOs. Pilots showed large variability in procedures and timings resulting in significant inconsistency in runway distances used as well as V-speed compliance. The observed effects from pilot timing latency correlated with the numerical simulation increased field length outputs. Variability in piloting procedures results in erratic field performance that deviates from AFM published values that invite disaster in an aircraft operating near its field performance limitations. Dissertation/Thesis Wood, Donald Leland (Author) Takahashi, Timothy T (Advisor) Niemczyk, Mary (Advisor) Files, Greg (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Engineering Aerospace engineering Systems science Aircraft Field Performance Aircrew Dispatch Human Factors Operations Takeoff Performance eng 89 pages Masters Thesis Human Systems Engineering 2017 Masters Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.45483 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2017
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Engineering
Aerospace engineering
Systems science
Aircraft Field Performance
Aircrew
Dispatch
Human Factors
Operations
Takeoff Performance
spellingShingle Engineering
Aerospace engineering
Systems science
Aircraft Field Performance
Aircrew
Dispatch
Human Factors
Operations
Takeoff Performance
Experimental Investigation of Typical Aircraft Field Performance Versus Predicted Performance Targets
description abstract: This thesis explores the human factors effects pilots have when controlling the aircraft during the takeoff phase of flight. These variables come into play in the transitory phase from ground roll to flight, and in the initiation of procedures to abort a takeoff during the ground run. The FAA provides regulations for manufacturers and operators to follow, ensuring safe manufacture of aircraft and pilots that fly without endangering the passengers; however, details regarding accounting of piloting variability are lacking. Creation of a numerical simulation allowed for the controlled variation of isolated piloting procedures in order to evaluate effects on field performance. Reduced rotation rates and delayed reaction times were found to cause significant increases in field length requirements over values published in the AFM. A pilot survey was conducted to evaluate common practices for line pilots in the field, which revealed minimum regulatory compliance is exercised with little to no feedback on runway length requirements. Finally, observation of pilots training in a CRJ-200 FTD gathered extensive information on typical piloting timings in the cockpit. AEO and OEI takeoffs were observed, as well as RTOs. Pilots showed large variability in procedures and timings resulting in significant inconsistency in runway distances used as well as V-speed compliance. The observed effects from pilot timing latency correlated with the numerical simulation increased field length outputs. Variability in piloting procedures results in erratic field performance that deviates from AFM published values that invite disaster in an aircraft operating near its field performance limitations. === Dissertation/Thesis === Masters Thesis Human Systems Engineering 2017
author2 Wood, Donald Leland (Author)
author_facet Wood, Donald Leland (Author)
title Experimental Investigation of Typical Aircraft Field Performance Versus Predicted Performance Targets
title_short Experimental Investigation of Typical Aircraft Field Performance Versus Predicted Performance Targets
title_full Experimental Investigation of Typical Aircraft Field Performance Versus Predicted Performance Targets
title_fullStr Experimental Investigation of Typical Aircraft Field Performance Versus Predicted Performance Targets
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Investigation of Typical Aircraft Field Performance Versus Predicted Performance Targets
title_sort experimental investigation of typical aircraft field performance versus predicted performance targets
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.45483
_version_ 1718701550438711296