A Comparison of Los Angeles and Phoenix Homeowners’ Attitudes and Behaviors towards Outdoor Water Conservation

abstract: Los Angeles, California and Phoenix, Arizona are two naturally water-scarce regions that rely on imported water to meet their local water needs. Both areas have been experiencing an ongoing drought that has negatively affected their local water supply. Populations in both cities continue t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Turrentine, Heather Catherine (Author)
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.40247
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-40247
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-402472018-06-22T03:07:41Z A Comparison of Los Angeles and Phoenix Homeowners’ Attitudes and Behaviors towards Outdoor Water Conservation abstract: Los Angeles, California and Phoenix, Arizona are two naturally water-scarce regions that rely on imported water to meet their local water needs. Both areas have been experiencing an ongoing drought that has negatively affected their local water supply. Populations in both cities continue to grow, increasing overall demand for water as the supply decreases. Water conservation is important for the sustainability of each town. However, the methods utilized to conserve residential water in the two areas differ drastically; Los Angeles has implemented involuntary water rationing and Phoenix has not. The widespread effectiveness of involuntary restrictions makes them a popular management scheme. Despite their immediate effectiveness, little is known about how involuntary restrictions affect attitudinal precursors towards the behavior in question and thus, whether or not the restrictions are potentially helpful or harmful to lasting behavior change. This study adapted the Theory of Planned Behavior to survey 361 homeowners in Los Angeles and Phoenix to examine how involuntary water restrictions shape attitudinal precursors to outdoor water conservation. This study found that when involuntary water restrictions are present, residents feel less in control of their outdoor water use. However, in the presence of involuntary water restrictions, stronger social norms and stronger support for policy prescriptions over outdoor water use were found. The favorable societal support towards water conservation, conceptualized as social norms and policy attitudes, in the presence of involuntary water restrictions is potentially promising for lasting behavior change. Dissertation/Thesis Turrentine, Heather Catherine (Author) Klinsky, Sonja (Advisor) Dooley, Kevin (Advisor) Larson, Kelli (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Water resources management Behavioral psychology Sustainability behavior change perceived behavioral control self-efficacy theory of planned behavior water conservation water governance eng 136 pages Masters Thesis Sustainability 2016 Masters Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.40247 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2016
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Water resources management
Behavioral psychology
Sustainability
behavior change
perceived behavioral control
self-efficacy
theory of planned behavior
water conservation
water governance
spellingShingle Water resources management
Behavioral psychology
Sustainability
behavior change
perceived behavioral control
self-efficacy
theory of planned behavior
water conservation
water governance
A Comparison of Los Angeles and Phoenix Homeowners’ Attitudes and Behaviors towards Outdoor Water Conservation
description abstract: Los Angeles, California and Phoenix, Arizona are two naturally water-scarce regions that rely on imported water to meet their local water needs. Both areas have been experiencing an ongoing drought that has negatively affected their local water supply. Populations in both cities continue to grow, increasing overall demand for water as the supply decreases. Water conservation is important for the sustainability of each town. However, the methods utilized to conserve residential water in the two areas differ drastically; Los Angeles has implemented involuntary water rationing and Phoenix has not. The widespread effectiveness of involuntary restrictions makes them a popular management scheme. Despite their immediate effectiveness, little is known about how involuntary restrictions affect attitudinal precursors towards the behavior in question and thus, whether or not the restrictions are potentially helpful or harmful to lasting behavior change. This study adapted the Theory of Planned Behavior to survey 361 homeowners in Los Angeles and Phoenix to examine how involuntary water restrictions shape attitudinal precursors to outdoor water conservation. This study found that when involuntary water restrictions are present, residents feel less in control of their outdoor water use. However, in the presence of involuntary water restrictions, stronger social norms and stronger support for policy prescriptions over outdoor water use were found. The favorable societal support towards water conservation, conceptualized as social norms and policy attitudes, in the presence of involuntary water restrictions is potentially promising for lasting behavior change. === Dissertation/Thesis === Masters Thesis Sustainability 2016
author2 Turrentine, Heather Catherine (Author)
author_facet Turrentine, Heather Catherine (Author)
title A Comparison of Los Angeles and Phoenix Homeowners’ Attitudes and Behaviors towards Outdoor Water Conservation
title_short A Comparison of Los Angeles and Phoenix Homeowners’ Attitudes and Behaviors towards Outdoor Water Conservation
title_full A Comparison of Los Angeles and Phoenix Homeowners’ Attitudes and Behaviors towards Outdoor Water Conservation
title_fullStr A Comparison of Los Angeles and Phoenix Homeowners’ Attitudes and Behaviors towards Outdoor Water Conservation
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Los Angeles and Phoenix Homeowners’ Attitudes and Behaviors towards Outdoor Water Conservation
title_sort comparison of los angeles and phoenix homeowners’ attitudes and behaviors towards outdoor water conservation
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.40247
_version_ 1718701230387101696