Maltreatment Re-Reports among Child Welfare-Involved Families with Intellectually Disabled Caregivers

abstract: Families with intellectually disabled caregivers are more likely than families without intellectually disabled caregivers to experience poor child welfare outcomes, including high rates of substantiation. However, little research has examined child maltreatment re-reports among this popula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: James, Stephen (Author)
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.24816
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-24816
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-248162018-06-22T03:04:49Z Maltreatment Re-Reports among Child Welfare-Involved Families with Intellectually Disabled Caregivers abstract: Families with intellectually disabled caregivers are more likely than families without intellectually disabled caregivers to experience poor child welfare outcomes, including high rates of substantiation. However, little research has examined child maltreatment re-reports among this population. The objectives of this study were to begin to address this gap by examining maltreatment re-report rates, and factors associated with maltreatment re-reports, among child welfare-involved families with intellectually disabled caregivers. Survival analysis was conducted using restricted release data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW) to examine the hazard rate and survival rate of maltreatment re-reports for cases with, and without, intellectually disabled caregivers. Multivariate discrete-time hazard models were run using logistic regression to examine the relationship between various predictors and the hazard of maltreatment re-reports. Results revealed that child protection cases involving caregivers with intellectual disabilities were no more likely than cases without intellectually disabled caregivers to experience maltreatment re-reports. Predictors of maltreatment re-reports varied based on whether or not a case involved a caregiver with an intellectual disability. Child gender, child disability, and child race/ethnicity were significant predictors for cases involving caregivers with intellectual disabilities, whereas prior involvement with CPS, caretaker drug problems, and initial allegation substantiation were significant predictors for cases not involving caregivers with intellectual disabilities. These preliminary findings suggest that prevention, screening, and intervention strategies should consider variability of predictive factors based on caregiver intellectual disability status. Dissertation/Thesis James, Stephen (Author) Shafer, Michael S (Advisor) Krysik, Judy (Committee member) Ayon, Cecilia (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Social work eng 231 pages Ph.D. Social Work 2014 Doctoral Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.24816 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2014
collection NDLTD
language English
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic Social work
spellingShingle Social work
Maltreatment Re-Reports among Child Welfare-Involved Families with Intellectually Disabled Caregivers
description abstract: Families with intellectually disabled caregivers are more likely than families without intellectually disabled caregivers to experience poor child welfare outcomes, including high rates of substantiation. However, little research has examined child maltreatment re-reports among this population. The objectives of this study were to begin to address this gap by examining maltreatment re-report rates, and factors associated with maltreatment re-reports, among child welfare-involved families with intellectually disabled caregivers. Survival analysis was conducted using restricted release data from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW) to examine the hazard rate and survival rate of maltreatment re-reports for cases with, and without, intellectually disabled caregivers. Multivariate discrete-time hazard models were run using logistic regression to examine the relationship between various predictors and the hazard of maltreatment re-reports. Results revealed that child protection cases involving caregivers with intellectual disabilities were no more likely than cases without intellectually disabled caregivers to experience maltreatment re-reports. Predictors of maltreatment re-reports varied based on whether or not a case involved a caregiver with an intellectual disability. Child gender, child disability, and child race/ethnicity were significant predictors for cases involving caregivers with intellectual disabilities, whereas prior involvement with CPS, caretaker drug problems, and initial allegation substantiation were significant predictors for cases not involving caregivers with intellectual disabilities. These preliminary findings suggest that prevention, screening, and intervention strategies should consider variability of predictive factors based on caregiver intellectual disability status. === Dissertation/Thesis === Ph.D. Social Work 2014
author2 James, Stephen (Author)
author_facet James, Stephen (Author)
title Maltreatment Re-Reports among Child Welfare-Involved Families with Intellectually Disabled Caregivers
title_short Maltreatment Re-Reports among Child Welfare-Involved Families with Intellectually Disabled Caregivers
title_full Maltreatment Re-Reports among Child Welfare-Involved Families with Intellectually Disabled Caregivers
title_fullStr Maltreatment Re-Reports among Child Welfare-Involved Families with Intellectually Disabled Caregivers
title_full_unstemmed Maltreatment Re-Reports among Child Welfare-Involved Families with Intellectually Disabled Caregivers
title_sort maltreatment re-reports among child welfare-involved families with intellectually disabled caregivers
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.24816
_version_ 1718700335220916224