Bridging the Gap Between Space-Filling and Optimal Designs

abstract: This dissertation explores different methodologies for combining two popular design paradigms in the field of computer experiments. Space-filling designs are commonly used in order to ensure that there is good coverage of the design space, but they may not result in good properties when it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Kennedy, Kathryn Sarah (Author)
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.18682
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-18682
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-186822018-06-22T03:04:17Z Bridging the Gap Between Space-Filling and Optimal Designs abstract: This dissertation explores different methodologies for combining two popular design paradigms in the field of computer experiments. Space-filling designs are commonly used in order to ensure that there is good coverage of the design space, but they may not result in good properties when it comes to model fitting. Optimal designs traditionally perform very well in terms of model fitting, particularly when a polynomial is intended, but can result in problematic replication in the case of insignificant factors. By bringing these two design types together, positive properties of each can be retained while mitigating potential weaknesses. Hybrid space-filling designs, generated as Latin hypercubes augmented with I-optimal points, are compared to designs of each contributing component. A second design type called a bridge design is also evaluated, which further integrates the disparate design types. Bridge designs are the result of a Latin hypercube undergoing coordinate exchange to reach constrained D-optimality, ensuring that there is zero replication of factors in any one-dimensional projection. Lastly, bridge designs were augmented with I-optimal points with two goals in mind. Augmentation with candidate points generated assuming the same underlying analysis model serves to reduce the prediction variance without greatly compromising the space-filling property of the design, while augmentation with candidate points generated assuming a different underlying analysis model can greatly reduce the impact of model misspecification during the design phase. Each of these composite designs are compared to pure space-filling and optimal designs. They typically out-perform pure space-filling designs in terms of prediction variance and alphabetic efficiency, while maintaining comparability with pure optimal designs at small sample size. This justifies them as excellent candidates for initial experimentation. Dissertation/Thesis Kennedy, Kathryn Sarah (Author) Montgomery, Douglas C (Advisor) Johnson, Rachel T (Advisor) Fowler, John W (Committee member) Borror, Connie M (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Industrial engineering Computer experiments Design of experiments Optimal designs Space-filling designs eng 124 pages Ph.D. Industrial Engineering 2013 Doctoral Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.18682 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2013
collection NDLTD
language English
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic Industrial engineering
Computer experiments
Design of experiments
Optimal designs
Space-filling designs
spellingShingle Industrial engineering
Computer experiments
Design of experiments
Optimal designs
Space-filling designs
Bridging the Gap Between Space-Filling and Optimal Designs
description abstract: This dissertation explores different methodologies for combining two popular design paradigms in the field of computer experiments. Space-filling designs are commonly used in order to ensure that there is good coverage of the design space, but they may not result in good properties when it comes to model fitting. Optimal designs traditionally perform very well in terms of model fitting, particularly when a polynomial is intended, but can result in problematic replication in the case of insignificant factors. By bringing these two design types together, positive properties of each can be retained while mitigating potential weaknesses. Hybrid space-filling designs, generated as Latin hypercubes augmented with I-optimal points, are compared to designs of each contributing component. A second design type called a bridge design is also evaluated, which further integrates the disparate design types. Bridge designs are the result of a Latin hypercube undergoing coordinate exchange to reach constrained D-optimality, ensuring that there is zero replication of factors in any one-dimensional projection. Lastly, bridge designs were augmented with I-optimal points with two goals in mind. Augmentation with candidate points generated assuming the same underlying analysis model serves to reduce the prediction variance without greatly compromising the space-filling property of the design, while augmentation with candidate points generated assuming a different underlying analysis model can greatly reduce the impact of model misspecification during the design phase. Each of these composite designs are compared to pure space-filling and optimal designs. They typically out-perform pure space-filling designs in terms of prediction variance and alphabetic efficiency, while maintaining comparability with pure optimal designs at small sample size. This justifies them as excellent candidates for initial experimentation. === Dissertation/Thesis === Ph.D. Industrial Engineering 2013
author2 Kennedy, Kathryn Sarah (Author)
author_facet Kennedy, Kathryn Sarah (Author)
title Bridging the Gap Between Space-Filling and Optimal Designs
title_short Bridging the Gap Between Space-Filling and Optimal Designs
title_full Bridging the Gap Between Space-Filling and Optimal Designs
title_fullStr Bridging the Gap Between Space-Filling and Optimal Designs
title_full_unstemmed Bridging the Gap Between Space-Filling and Optimal Designs
title_sort bridging the gap between space-filling and optimal designs
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.18682
_version_ 1718700172502892544