Argument Structure in Arabic: Lexicon or Syntax?

abstract: A question that has driven much of the current research in formal syntax is whether it is the lexicon or the syntax that determines the argument structure of a verb. This dissertation attempts to answer this question with a focus on Arabic, a language that has received little attention in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Alrashed, Mohammed Abdullah (Author)
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.15878
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-15878
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-158782018-06-22T03:03:28Z Argument Structure in Arabic: Lexicon or Syntax? abstract: A question that has driven much of the current research in formal syntax is whether it is the lexicon or the syntax that determines the argument structure of a verb. This dissertation attempts to answer this question with a focus on Arabic, a language that has received little attention in the literature of argument structure. In this dissertation, argument structure realization is examined in relation to three different components, namely the root, the CV-skeleton and the structure around the verb. I argue that argument structure is not determined on a root level in Arabic. I also show that only few CV-skeletons (verb patterns) are associated with certain argument structures. Instead, the burden of determining argument structure lies on elements around the structure of VP. The determinants of inner aspect in Arabic and the relation between eventuality types and argument structure are also examined. A cartographic model is provided to show how elements around the VP play a role in determining the inner aspect. This model also represents a relationship between argument structure and eventuality types. The question of what determines argument structure is further addressed through the investigation of the causative/inchoative alternation in Arabic in light of recent semantic and syntactic accounts. I argue that most Arabic verbs that undergo the alternation are non-agentive change-of-state verbs. Although certain lexical characteristics may account for which verbs alternate and which do not, exceptions within a language and/or across languages do exist. I point to a range of phenomena that can be only explained from syntactic points of view. Dissertation/Thesis Alrashed, Mohammed Abdullah (Author) Van Gelderen, Elly (Advisor) Harley, Heidi (Committee member) Adams, Karen (Committee member) Major, Roy (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Linguistics arabic syntax causative/inchoative in arabic inner aspect morphosyntax of arabic syntax-semantics interface vp in arabic eng 250 pages Ph.D. English 2012 Doctoral Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.15878 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2012
collection NDLTD
language English
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic Linguistics
arabic syntax
causative/inchoative in arabic
inner aspect
morphosyntax of arabic
syntax-semantics interface
vp in arabic
spellingShingle Linguistics
arabic syntax
causative/inchoative in arabic
inner aspect
morphosyntax of arabic
syntax-semantics interface
vp in arabic
Argument Structure in Arabic: Lexicon or Syntax?
description abstract: A question that has driven much of the current research in formal syntax is whether it is the lexicon or the syntax that determines the argument structure of a verb. This dissertation attempts to answer this question with a focus on Arabic, a language that has received little attention in the literature of argument structure. In this dissertation, argument structure realization is examined in relation to three different components, namely the root, the CV-skeleton and the structure around the verb. I argue that argument structure is not determined on a root level in Arabic. I also show that only few CV-skeletons (verb patterns) are associated with certain argument structures. Instead, the burden of determining argument structure lies on elements around the structure of VP. The determinants of inner aspect in Arabic and the relation between eventuality types and argument structure are also examined. A cartographic model is provided to show how elements around the VP play a role in determining the inner aspect. This model also represents a relationship between argument structure and eventuality types. The question of what determines argument structure is further addressed through the investigation of the causative/inchoative alternation in Arabic in light of recent semantic and syntactic accounts. I argue that most Arabic verbs that undergo the alternation are non-agentive change-of-state verbs. Although certain lexical characteristics may account for which verbs alternate and which do not, exceptions within a language and/or across languages do exist. I point to a range of phenomena that can be only explained from syntactic points of view. === Dissertation/Thesis === Ph.D. English 2012
author2 Alrashed, Mohammed Abdullah (Author)
author_facet Alrashed, Mohammed Abdullah (Author)
title Argument Structure in Arabic: Lexicon or Syntax?
title_short Argument Structure in Arabic: Lexicon or Syntax?
title_full Argument Structure in Arabic: Lexicon or Syntax?
title_fullStr Argument Structure in Arabic: Lexicon or Syntax?
title_full_unstemmed Argument Structure in Arabic: Lexicon or Syntax?
title_sort argument structure in arabic: lexicon or syntax?
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.15878
_version_ 1718699891453067264