Imperative Clause Structure and its Realization in Old English Syntax: A Corpus Study

abstract: The nature of imperative syntax has remained an elusive, yet ever-present, subject in syntactic research, spanning several decades of linguistic inquiry and analysis, and it is therefore unsurprising that current views on the subject continue to be somewhat divided. This thesis examines th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Kruger, William W. (Author)
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.14868
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-14868
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-148682018-06-22T03:02:53Z Imperative Clause Structure and its Realization in Old English Syntax: A Corpus Study abstract: The nature of imperative syntax has remained an elusive, yet ever-present, subject in syntactic research, spanning several decades of linguistic inquiry and analysis, and it is therefore unsurprising that current views on the subject continue to be somewhat divided. This thesis examines the syntactic evidence from imperatives in Old English and ultimately seeks to develop a picture of the possibilities for imperative clauses in OE alongside an overall framework for imperative syntax within contemporary theoretical models of syntactic structure. The general, perceived pattern for OE imperative clauses (e.g. Millward 1971) is “verb−first,” and statistical data from the corpora confirm this perception, with the majority of imperative clauses exhibiting the verb in clause−initial position. Imperative constructions with post− and preverbal overt subjects are also examined at length, and postverbal subjects are found to be the majority case. These results are further expanded by examinations of data from verb−second and verb−third contexts, which include possibilities for topicalized constituents and adverbs. Ultimately, the relative position of both the verb and the subject and the relationship between these and other elements in the totality of the data provide essential clues for constructing a clearer model of OE imperative syntax. Within a relatively rich cartographic framework (Rizzi 1997), I therefore argue that the imperative verb is standardly fronted to the head of ForceP, with the overt subject remaining in spec−FinP, in parallel with other models for imperative syntax and OE syntax. Exceptions to this pattern for imperatives which suggest lower positions for the imperative verb (e.g. verb−second and verb−third constructions) are also accounted for, all with the central goal of demonstrating a consistent pattern underlying the realization of imperative syntax in Old English. Dissertation/Thesis Kruger, William W. (Author) Van Gelderen, Elly (Advisor) Adams, Karen (Committee member) Major, Roy (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Linguistics Ancient languages Language Cartography Clause Structure Corpus Imperative Old English Syntax eng 128 pages M.A. English 2012 Masters Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.14868 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2012
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Linguistics
Ancient languages
Language
Cartography
Clause Structure
Corpus
Imperative
Old English
Syntax
spellingShingle Linguistics
Ancient languages
Language
Cartography
Clause Structure
Corpus
Imperative
Old English
Syntax
Imperative Clause Structure and its Realization in Old English Syntax: A Corpus Study
description abstract: The nature of imperative syntax has remained an elusive, yet ever-present, subject in syntactic research, spanning several decades of linguistic inquiry and analysis, and it is therefore unsurprising that current views on the subject continue to be somewhat divided. This thesis examines the syntactic evidence from imperatives in Old English and ultimately seeks to develop a picture of the possibilities for imperative clauses in OE alongside an overall framework for imperative syntax within contemporary theoretical models of syntactic structure. The general, perceived pattern for OE imperative clauses (e.g. Millward 1971) is “verb−first,” and statistical data from the corpora confirm this perception, with the majority of imperative clauses exhibiting the verb in clause−initial position. Imperative constructions with post− and preverbal overt subjects are also examined at length, and postverbal subjects are found to be the majority case. These results are further expanded by examinations of data from verb−second and verb−third contexts, which include possibilities for topicalized constituents and adverbs. Ultimately, the relative position of both the verb and the subject and the relationship between these and other elements in the totality of the data provide essential clues for constructing a clearer model of OE imperative syntax. Within a relatively rich cartographic framework (Rizzi 1997), I therefore argue that the imperative verb is standardly fronted to the head of ForceP, with the overt subject remaining in spec−FinP, in parallel with other models for imperative syntax and OE syntax. Exceptions to this pattern for imperatives which suggest lower positions for the imperative verb (e.g. verb−second and verb−third constructions) are also accounted for, all with the central goal of demonstrating a consistent pattern underlying the realization of imperative syntax in Old English. === Dissertation/Thesis === M.A. English 2012
author2 Kruger, William W. (Author)
author_facet Kruger, William W. (Author)
title Imperative Clause Structure and its Realization in Old English Syntax: A Corpus Study
title_short Imperative Clause Structure and its Realization in Old English Syntax: A Corpus Study
title_full Imperative Clause Structure and its Realization in Old English Syntax: A Corpus Study
title_fullStr Imperative Clause Structure and its Realization in Old English Syntax: A Corpus Study
title_full_unstemmed Imperative Clause Structure and its Realization in Old English Syntax: A Corpus Study
title_sort imperative clause structure and its realization in old english syntax: a corpus study
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.14868
_version_ 1718699590458277888