An Evaluation of Limiting Parameters of an In Situ Trichloroethene Bioremediation Project Based on Seven TCE Field Bioremediation Studies
Seven aerobic field trichloroethene (TCE) bioremediation projects were evaluated to determine key parameters leading to in situ TCE bioremediation effectiveness. Key parameters identified were: 1) presence of other contaminants, 2) efficacy of the cometabolic inducer, 3) technology design, and...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
The University of Arizona.
1999
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/626785 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/626785 |
Summary: | Seven aerobic field trichloroethene (TCE) bioremediation projects were evaluated to
determine key parameters leading to in situ TCE bioremediation effectiveness. Key
parameters identified were: 1) presence of other contaminants, 2) efficacy of the cometabolic
inducer, 3) technology design, and 4) site soils and hydraulics. These four parameters were
then used to evaluate the pilot bioremediation operation at Air Force Plant #44 in Tucson,
Arizona. The pilot operation was poorly designed. Site characterization appeared
insufficient; laboratory studies were not representative of site conditions; 1, 1-dichloroethene
appeared to inhibit TCE degradation; the purpose of the injected methanol ( cometabolic
inducer) was unclear. Well design, specifically screen interval location, also contributed to
technology deficiency. Soil type appeared to be the most limiting component; hydraulic
conductivity (K) representative of the contaminated clay at the APP #44 site was estimated
at 1.5 x 10-5 cm/sec. Over the course of the trial, spatially averaged TCE concentrations
decreased by 41 %. Well chloride data calculations indicated that a 27% reduction may be
attributable to dilution, thereby suggesting that only a 14% decrease in concentrations may
be attributable to biological degradation. |
---|