Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD

Animal model of cigarette smoke (CS) -induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the primary testing methodology for drug therapies and studies on pathogenic mechanisms of disease. However, researchers have rarely run simultaneous or side-by-side tests of whole-body and nose-only CS exp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shu, Jiaze, Li, Defu, Ouyang, Haiping, Huang, Junyi, Long, Zhen, Liang, Zhihao, Chen, Yuqin, Chen, Yiguan, Zheng, Qiuyu, Kuang, Meidan, Tang, Haiyang, Wang, Jian, Lu, Wenju
Other Authors: Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Physiol
Language:en
Published: NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP 2017
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/626192
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/626192
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-626192
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6261922017-12-07T03:00:31Z Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD Shu, Jiaze Li, Defu Ouyang, Haiping Huang, Junyi Long, Zhen Liang, Zhihao Chen, Yuqin Chen, Yiguan Zheng, Qiuyu Kuang, Meidan Tang, Haiyang Wang, Jian Lu, Wenju Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Physiol Animal model of cigarette smoke (CS) -induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the primary testing methodology for drug therapies and studies on pathogenic mechanisms of disease. However, researchers have rarely run simultaneous or side-by-side tests of whole-body and nose-only CS exposure in building their mouse models of COPD. We compared and evaluated these two different methods of CS exposure, plus airway Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) inhalation, in building our COPD mouse model. Compared with the control group, CS exposed mice showed significant increased inspiratory resistance, functional residual capacity, right ventricular hypertrophy index, and total cell count in BALF. Moreover, histological staining exhibited goblet cell hyperplasia, lung inflammation, thickening of smooth muscle layer on bronchia, and lung angiogenesis in both methods of CS exposure. Our data indicated that a viable mouse model of COPD can be established by combining the results from wholebody CS exposure, nose-only CS exposure, and airway LPS inhalation testing. However, in our study, we also found that, given the same amount of particulate intake, changes in right ventricular pressure and intimal thickening of pulmonary small artery are a little more serious in nose-only CS exposure method than changes in the whole-body CS exposure method. 2017-11-13 Article Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD 2017, 7 (1) Scientific Reports 2045-2322 29133824 10.1038/s41598-017-15685-y http://hdl.handle.net/10150/626192 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/626192 Scientific Reports en http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-15685-y © The Author(s) 2017. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
description Animal model of cigarette smoke (CS) -induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the primary testing methodology for drug therapies and studies on pathogenic mechanisms of disease. However, researchers have rarely run simultaneous or side-by-side tests of whole-body and nose-only CS exposure in building their mouse models of COPD. We compared and evaluated these two different methods of CS exposure, plus airway Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) inhalation, in building our COPD mouse model. Compared with the control group, CS exposed mice showed significant increased inspiratory resistance, functional residual capacity, right ventricular hypertrophy index, and total cell count in BALF. Moreover, histological staining exhibited goblet cell hyperplasia, lung inflammation, thickening of smooth muscle layer on bronchia, and lung angiogenesis in both methods of CS exposure. Our data indicated that a viable mouse model of COPD can be established by combining the results from wholebody CS exposure, nose-only CS exposure, and airway LPS inhalation testing. However, in our study, we also found that, given the same amount of particulate intake, changes in right ventricular pressure and intimal thickening of pulmonary small artery are a little more serious in nose-only CS exposure method than changes in the whole-body CS exposure method.
author2 Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Physiol
author_facet Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Physiol
Shu, Jiaze
Li, Defu
Ouyang, Haiping
Huang, Junyi
Long, Zhen
Liang, Zhihao
Chen, Yuqin
Chen, Yiguan
Zheng, Qiuyu
Kuang, Meidan
Tang, Haiyang
Wang, Jian
Lu, Wenju
author Shu, Jiaze
Li, Defu
Ouyang, Haiping
Huang, Junyi
Long, Zhen
Liang, Zhihao
Chen, Yuqin
Chen, Yiguan
Zheng, Qiuyu
Kuang, Meidan
Tang, Haiyang
Wang, Jian
Lu, Wenju
spellingShingle Shu, Jiaze
Li, Defu
Ouyang, Haiping
Huang, Junyi
Long, Zhen
Liang, Zhihao
Chen, Yuqin
Chen, Yiguan
Zheng, Qiuyu
Kuang, Meidan
Tang, Haiyang
Wang, Jian
Lu, Wenju
Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD
author_sort Shu, Jiaze
title Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD
title_short Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD
title_full Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD
title_fullStr Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD
title_sort comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of copd
publisher NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/626192
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/626192
work_keys_str_mv AT shujiaze comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT lidefu comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT ouyanghaiping comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT huangjunyi comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT longzhen comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT liangzhihao comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT chenyuqin comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT chenyiguan comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT zhengqiuyu comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT kuangmeidan comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT tanghaiyang comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT wangjian comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
AT luwenju comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd
_version_ 1718563505291919360