Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD
Animal model of cigarette smoke (CS) -induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the primary testing methodology for drug therapies and studies on pathogenic mechanisms of disease. However, researchers have rarely run simultaneous or side-by-side tests of whole-body and nose-only CS exp...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en |
Published: |
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
2017
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/626192 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/626192 |
id |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-626192 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6261922017-12-07T03:00:31Z Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD Shu, Jiaze Li, Defu Ouyang, Haiping Huang, Junyi Long, Zhen Liang, Zhihao Chen, Yuqin Chen, Yiguan Zheng, Qiuyu Kuang, Meidan Tang, Haiyang Wang, Jian Lu, Wenju Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Physiol Animal model of cigarette smoke (CS) -induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the primary testing methodology for drug therapies and studies on pathogenic mechanisms of disease. However, researchers have rarely run simultaneous or side-by-side tests of whole-body and nose-only CS exposure in building their mouse models of COPD. We compared and evaluated these two different methods of CS exposure, plus airway Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) inhalation, in building our COPD mouse model. Compared with the control group, CS exposed mice showed significant increased inspiratory resistance, functional residual capacity, right ventricular hypertrophy index, and total cell count in BALF. Moreover, histological staining exhibited goblet cell hyperplasia, lung inflammation, thickening of smooth muscle layer on bronchia, and lung angiogenesis in both methods of CS exposure. Our data indicated that a viable mouse model of COPD can be established by combining the results from wholebody CS exposure, nose-only CS exposure, and airway LPS inhalation testing. However, in our study, we also found that, given the same amount of particulate intake, changes in right ventricular pressure and intimal thickening of pulmonary small artery are a little more serious in nose-only CS exposure method than changes in the whole-body CS exposure method. 2017-11-13 Article Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD 2017, 7 (1) Scientific Reports 2045-2322 29133824 10.1038/s41598-017-15685-y http://hdl.handle.net/10150/626192 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/626192 Scientific Reports en http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-15685-y © The Author(s) 2017. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Animal model of cigarette smoke (CS) -induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the primary testing methodology for drug therapies and studies on pathogenic mechanisms of disease. However, researchers have rarely run simultaneous or side-by-side tests of whole-body and nose-only CS exposure in building their mouse models of COPD. We compared and evaluated these two different methods of CS exposure, plus airway Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) inhalation, in building our COPD mouse model. Compared with the control group, CS exposed mice showed significant increased inspiratory resistance, functional residual capacity, right ventricular hypertrophy index, and total cell count in BALF. Moreover, histological staining exhibited goblet cell hyperplasia, lung inflammation, thickening of smooth muscle layer on bronchia, and lung angiogenesis in both methods of CS exposure. Our data indicated that a viable mouse model of COPD can be established by combining the results from wholebody CS exposure, nose-only CS exposure, and airway LPS inhalation testing. However, in our study, we also found that, given the same amount of particulate intake, changes in right ventricular pressure and intimal thickening of pulmonary small artery are a little more serious in nose-only CS exposure method than changes in the whole-body CS exposure method. |
author2 |
Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Physiol |
author_facet |
Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Physiol Shu, Jiaze Li, Defu Ouyang, Haiping Huang, Junyi Long, Zhen Liang, Zhihao Chen, Yuqin Chen, Yiguan Zheng, Qiuyu Kuang, Meidan Tang, Haiyang Wang, Jian Lu, Wenju |
author |
Shu, Jiaze Li, Defu Ouyang, Haiping Huang, Junyi Long, Zhen Liang, Zhihao Chen, Yuqin Chen, Yiguan Zheng, Qiuyu Kuang, Meidan Tang, Haiyang Wang, Jian Lu, Wenju |
spellingShingle |
Shu, Jiaze Li, Defu Ouyang, Haiping Huang, Junyi Long, Zhen Liang, Zhihao Chen, Yuqin Chen, Yiguan Zheng, Qiuyu Kuang, Meidan Tang, Haiyang Wang, Jian Lu, Wenju Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD |
author_sort |
Shu, Jiaze |
title |
Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD |
title_short |
Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD |
title_full |
Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD |
title_fullStr |
Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of COPD |
title_sort |
comparison and evaluation of two different methods to establish the cigarette smoke exposure mouse model of copd |
publisher |
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/626192 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/626192 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shujiaze comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT lidefu comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT ouyanghaiping comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT huangjunyi comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT longzhen comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT liangzhihao comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT chenyuqin comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT chenyiguan comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT zhengqiuyu comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT kuangmeidan comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT tanghaiyang comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT wangjian comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd AT luwenju comparisonandevaluationoftwodifferentmethodstoestablishthecigarettesmokeexposuremousemodelofcopd |
_version_ |
1718563505291919360 |