Additional comparisons of randomization-test procedures for single-case multiple-baseline designs: Alternative effect types
A number of randomization statistical procedures have been developed to analyze the results from single-case multiple-baseline intervention investigations. In a previous simulation study, comparisons of the various procedures revealed distinct differences among them in their ability to detect immedi...
Main Authors: | Levin, Joel R., Ferron, John M., Gafurov, Boris S. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | University of Arizona |
Language: | en |
Published: |
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/625957 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/625957 |
Similar Items
-
Accounting for baseline trends in intervention studies: Methods, effect sizes, and software
by: Li-Ting Chen, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Unbalanced Baseline in School-Based Interventions to Prevent Obesity: Adjustment Can Lead to Bias - a Systematic Review
by: Rosely Sichieri, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01) -
Pro and Con of Single Subject Research in Adapted Physical Education and the Guidance for an Appropriate Research Designing
by: Kihong Kim
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Propensity score to detect baseline imbalance in cluster randomized trials: the role of the c-statistic
by: Clémence Leyrat, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
The correlation between baseline score and post-intervention score, and its implications for statistical analysis
by: Lei Clifton, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)