Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic

The Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SAVAHCS) Chronic Pain Rehabilitation Clinic (CPRC) is an interdisciplinary pain management team. The team consists of physicians, a psychologist, a kinesiotherapist, a nurse and a pharmacist, who work together, to manage pain. In order to mon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: DiGiacomo, Mark N.
Other Authors: Hoyer, Gifford
Language:en_US
Published: The University of Arizona. 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/624467
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/624467
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-624467
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6244672017-06-29T03:00:33Z Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic DiGiacomo, Mark N. Hoyer, Gifford College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic Pain Management The Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SAVAHCS) Chronic Pain Rehabilitation Clinic (CPRC) is an interdisciplinary pain management team. The team consists of physicians, a psychologist, a kinesiotherapist, a nurse and a pharmacist, who work together, to manage pain. In order to monitor and improve the effectiveness of treatment at SAVAHCS CPRC, the team created a pain outcomes measure collection program. A pilot study of the pain outcomes data collection process was conducted. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the data collection procedure and identify areas for improvement. The program planned to collect outcomes data at a new patient education/orientation class using an intake questionnaire. After three months, a follow-up questionnaire was to be mailed to the patient. The patient would then return the questionnaire, by mail, to the clinic where responses would be entered into an electronic database. Eight items in the data collection process were recognized as needing improvement. Three of the most important items follow. (1) Mailing out questionnaires had a low response rate, which could be solved by administering the intake questionnaire during the pharmacist medication evaluation, and the follow-up questionnaire, 6 months later, during a provider appointment. (2) The investigational review board approval process took longer than anticipated but could be corrected through enforcement of a submission time line. (3) Data entry required a large amount of time but could be rectified through the use of volunteers. Overall, the data collection program could gather outcome measures, but procedural adjustments need to occur. 2006 text Electronic Report http://hdl.handle.net/10150/624467 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/624467 en_US Copyright © is held by the author. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic
Pain Management
spellingShingle Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic
Pain Management
DiGiacomo, Mark N.
Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic
description The Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SAVAHCS) Chronic Pain Rehabilitation Clinic (CPRC) is an interdisciplinary pain management team. The team consists of physicians, a psychologist, a kinesiotherapist, a nurse and a pharmacist, who work together, to manage pain. In order to monitor and improve the effectiveness of treatment at SAVAHCS CPRC, the team created a pain outcomes measure collection program. A pilot study of the pain outcomes data collection process was conducted. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the data collection procedure and identify areas for improvement. The program planned to collect outcomes data at a new patient education/orientation class using an intake questionnaire. After three months, a follow-up questionnaire was to be mailed to the patient. The patient would then return the questionnaire, by mail, to the clinic where responses would be entered into an electronic database. Eight items in the data collection process were recognized as needing improvement. Three of the most important items follow. (1) Mailing out questionnaires had a low response rate, which could be solved by administering the intake questionnaire during the pharmacist medication evaluation, and the follow-up questionnaire, 6 months later, during a provider appointment. (2) The investigational review board approval process took longer than anticipated but could be corrected through enforcement of a submission time line. (3) Data entry required a large amount of time but could be rectified through the use of volunteers. Overall, the data collection program could gather outcome measures, but procedural adjustments need to occur.
author2 Hoyer, Gifford
author_facet Hoyer, Gifford
DiGiacomo, Mark N.
author DiGiacomo, Mark N.
author_sort DiGiacomo, Mark N.
title Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic
title_short Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic
title_full Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic
title_sort evaluation of a pain outcome measures collection program in an interdisciplinary pain management clinic
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 2006
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/624467
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/624467
work_keys_str_mv AT digiacomomarkn evaluationofapainoutcomemeasurescollectionprograminaninterdisciplinarypainmanagementclinic
_version_ 1718478556476997632