Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic
The Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SAVAHCS) Chronic Pain Rehabilitation Clinic (CPRC) is an interdisciplinary pain management team. The team consists of physicians, a psychologist, a kinesiotherapist, a nurse and a pharmacist, who work together, to manage pain. In order to mon...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
The University of Arizona.
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/624467 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/624467 |
id |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-624467 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6244672017-06-29T03:00:33Z Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic DiGiacomo, Mark N. Hoyer, Gifford College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic Pain Management The Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SAVAHCS) Chronic Pain Rehabilitation Clinic (CPRC) is an interdisciplinary pain management team. The team consists of physicians, a psychologist, a kinesiotherapist, a nurse and a pharmacist, who work together, to manage pain. In order to monitor and improve the effectiveness of treatment at SAVAHCS CPRC, the team created a pain outcomes measure collection program. A pilot study of the pain outcomes data collection process was conducted. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the data collection procedure and identify areas for improvement. The program planned to collect outcomes data at a new patient education/orientation class using an intake questionnaire. After three months, a follow-up questionnaire was to be mailed to the patient. The patient would then return the questionnaire, by mail, to the clinic where responses would be entered into an electronic database. Eight items in the data collection process were recognized as needing improvement. Three of the most important items follow. (1) Mailing out questionnaires had a low response rate, which could be solved by administering the intake questionnaire during the pharmacist medication evaluation, and the follow-up questionnaire, 6 months later, during a provider appointment. (2) The investigational review board approval process took longer than anticipated but could be corrected through enforcement of a submission time line. (3) Data entry required a large amount of time but could be rectified through the use of volunteers. Overall, the data collection program could gather outcome measures, but procedural adjustments need to occur. 2006 text Electronic Report http://hdl.handle.net/10150/624467 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/624467 en_US Copyright © is held by the author. The University of Arizona. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic Pain Management |
spellingShingle |
Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic Pain Management DiGiacomo, Mark N. Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic |
description |
The Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System (SAVAHCS) Chronic Pain Rehabilitation Clinic (CPRC) is an interdisciplinary pain management team. The team consists of physicians, a psychologist, a kinesiotherapist, a nurse and a pharmacist, who work together, to manage pain. In order to monitor and improve the effectiveness of treatment at SAVAHCS CPRC, the team created a pain outcomes measure collection program. A pilot study of the pain outcomes data collection process was conducted. The purpose of this project was to evaluate the data collection procedure and identify areas for improvement. The program planned to collect outcomes data at a new patient education/orientation class using an intake questionnaire. After three months, a follow-up questionnaire was to be mailed to the patient. The patient would then return the questionnaire, by mail, to the clinic where responses would be entered into an electronic database. Eight items in the data collection process were recognized as needing improvement. Three of the most important items follow. (1) Mailing out questionnaires had a low response rate, which could be solved by administering the intake questionnaire during the pharmacist medication evaluation, and the follow-up questionnaire, 6 months later, during a provider appointment. (2) The investigational review board approval process took longer than anticipated but could be corrected through enforcement of a submission time line. (3) Data entry required a large amount of time but could be rectified through the use of volunteers. Overall, the data collection program could gather outcome measures, but procedural adjustments need to occur. |
author2 |
Hoyer, Gifford |
author_facet |
Hoyer, Gifford DiGiacomo, Mark N. |
author |
DiGiacomo, Mark N. |
author_sort |
DiGiacomo, Mark N. |
title |
Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic |
title_short |
Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic |
title_full |
Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of a Pain Outcome Measures Collection Program in an Interdisciplinary Pain Management Clinic |
title_sort |
evaluation of a pain outcome measures collection program in an interdisciplinary pain management clinic |
publisher |
The University of Arizona. |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/624467 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/624467 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT digiacomomarkn evaluationofapainoutcomemeasurescollectionprograminaninterdisciplinarypainmanagementclinic |
_version_ |
1718478556476997632 |