University of Arizona Curriculum Mapping

Class of 2010 Abstract === OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative amount of time committed to each content area of the ACPE guidelines for curricular content and the three “outcomes expected of graduates” domains of the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy and to id...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johnson, Michelle, Paull, Brian
Other Authors: Murphy, John
Language:en_US
Published: The University of Arizona. 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623888
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/623888
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-623888
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6238882017-06-06T03:00:35Z University of Arizona Curriculum Mapping Johnson, Michelle Paull, Brian Murphy, John Slack, Marion College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona Curriculum Evaluation ACPE Guidelines Pharmacy Students Education Class of 2010 Abstract OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative amount of time committed to each content area of the ACPE guidelines for curricular content and the three “outcomes expected of graduates” domains of the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy and to identify potential areas of weakness within the current curriculum. METHODS: Course coordinators were emailed and asked to fill out a questionnaire that addressed the amount of time that was spent on a given topic during lectures. The questionnaire included all topics necessary for the education of all pharmacists according to the ACPE guidelines. Questionnaires were collected from all required courses in the Doctor of Pharmacy program curriculum. Each course coordinator was asked to respond to every section with a numerical value of 0-3, indicating the amount of time spent on each topic. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by all 37 course coordinators for required courses. 42 subsections were recommended to be reviewed by the curriculum committee. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for revision to the ACPE guidelines. A detailed description of the time and depth of each content area that should be covered within the curriculum would provide further guidance to colleges of pharmacy. Since this is not currently available, the data collected should be used as a tool to determine possible areas of deficiency within the University of Arizona Doctorate of Pharmacy curriculum. These areas need to be addressed by the curriculum committee. 2010 text Electronic Report http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623888 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/623888 en_US Copyright © is held by the author. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Curriculum Evaluation
ACPE Guidelines
Pharmacy Students
Education
spellingShingle Curriculum Evaluation
ACPE Guidelines
Pharmacy Students
Education
Johnson, Michelle
Paull, Brian
University of Arizona Curriculum Mapping
description Class of 2010 Abstract === OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative amount of time committed to each content area of the ACPE guidelines for curricular content and the three “outcomes expected of graduates” domains of the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy and to identify potential areas of weakness within the current curriculum. METHODS: Course coordinators were emailed and asked to fill out a questionnaire that addressed the amount of time that was spent on a given topic during lectures. The questionnaire included all topics necessary for the education of all pharmacists according to the ACPE guidelines. Questionnaires were collected from all required courses in the Doctor of Pharmacy program curriculum. Each course coordinator was asked to respond to every section with a numerical value of 0-3, indicating the amount of time spent on each topic. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by all 37 course coordinators for required courses. 42 subsections were recommended to be reviewed by the curriculum committee. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for revision to the ACPE guidelines. A detailed description of the time and depth of each content area that should be covered within the curriculum would provide further guidance to colleges of pharmacy. Since this is not currently available, the data collected should be used as a tool to determine possible areas of deficiency within the University of Arizona Doctorate of Pharmacy curriculum. These areas need to be addressed by the curriculum committee.
author2 Murphy, John
author_facet Murphy, John
Johnson, Michelle
Paull, Brian
author Johnson, Michelle
Paull, Brian
author_sort Johnson, Michelle
title University of Arizona Curriculum Mapping
title_short University of Arizona Curriculum Mapping
title_full University of Arizona Curriculum Mapping
title_fullStr University of Arizona Curriculum Mapping
title_full_unstemmed University of Arizona Curriculum Mapping
title_sort university of arizona curriculum mapping
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623888
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/623888
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonmichelle universityofarizonacurriculummapping
AT paullbrian universityofarizonacurriculummapping
_version_ 1718455914528243712