CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS
The main aim of this study is to develop a suitable method for the calibration and validation of mathematical models of large and complex aquifer systems. Since the calibration procedure depends on the nature of the model to be calibrated and since many kinds of models are used for groundwater,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
1973
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/617585 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/617585 |
id |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-617585 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6175852016-07-28T03:00:38Z CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS Sagar, Budhi Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona Groundwater -- Mathematical models. The main aim of this study is to develop a suitable method for the calibration and validation of mathematical models of large and complex aquifer systems. Since the calibration procedure depends on the nature of the model to be calibrated and since many kinds of models are used for groundwater, the question of model choice is broached first. Various aquifer models are critically reviewed and a table to compare them as to their capabilities and limitations is set up. The need for a general calibration method for models in which the flow is represented by partial differential equations is identified from this table. The calibration problem is formulated in the general mathematical framework as the inverse problem. Five types of inverse problems that exist in modeling aquifers by partial differential equations are identified. These are, to determine (1) parameters, (2) initial conditions, (3) boundary conditions, (4) inputs, and (5) a mixture of the above. Various methods to solve these inverse problems are reviewed, including those from fields other than hydrology. A new direct method to solve the inverse problem (DIMSIP) is then developed. Basically, this method consists of transforming the partial differential equations of flow to algebraic equations by substituting in them the values of the various derivatives of the dependent variable (which may be hydraulic pressure, chemical concentration or temperature). The parameters are then obtained by formulating the problem in a nonlinear optimization framework. The method of sequential unconstrained minimization is used. Spline functions are used to evaluate the derivatives of the dependent variable. Splines are functions defined by piecewise polynomial arcs in such a way that derivatives up to and including the order one less than the degree of polynomials used are continuous everywhere. The natural cubic splines used in this study have the additional property of minimum curvature which is analogous to minimum energy surface. These and the derivative preserving properties of splines make them an excellent tool for approximating the dependent variable surfaces in groundwater flow problems. Applications of the method to both a test situation as well as to real -world data are given. It is shown that the method evaluates the parameters, boundary conditions and inputs; that is, solves inverse problem type V. General conditions of heterogeneity and anisotropy can be evaluated. However, the method is not applicable to steady flows and has the limitation that flow models in which the parameters are functions of the dependent variable cannot be calibrated. In addition, at least one of the parameters has to be preassigned a value. A discussion of uncertainties in calibration procedures is given. The related problems of model validation and sampling of aquifers are also discussed. 1973-06 text Technical Report http://hdl.handle.net/10150/617585 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/617585 en_US Technical Reports on Hydrology and Water Resources, No. 17 Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Provided by the Department of Hydrology and Water Resources. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Groundwater -- Mathematical models. |
spellingShingle |
Groundwater -- Mathematical models. Sagar, Budhi CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS |
description |
The main aim of this study is to develop a suitable method for
the calibration and validation of mathematical models of large and complex
aquifer systems. Since the calibration procedure depends on the
nature of the model to be calibrated and since many kinds of models are
used for groundwater, the question of model choice is broached first.
Various aquifer models are critically reviewed and a table to compare
them as to their capabilities and limitations is set up. The need for a
general calibration method for models in which the flow is represented by
partial differential equations is identified from this table.
The calibration problem is formulated in the general mathematical
framework as the inverse problem. Five types of inverse problems that
exist in modeling aquifers by partial differential equations are identified.
These are, to determine (1) parameters, (2) initial conditions,
(3) boundary conditions, (4) inputs, and (5) a mixture of the above.
Various methods to solve these inverse problems are reviewed, including
those from fields other than hydrology. A new direct method to solve the
inverse problem (DIMSIP) is then developed. Basically, this method consists
of transforming the partial differential equations of flow to algebraic
equations by substituting in them the values of the various
derivatives of the dependent variable (which may be hydraulic pressure,
chemical concentration or temperature). The parameters are then obtained
by formulating the problem in a nonlinear optimization framework. The
method of sequential unconstrained minimization is used. Spline functions are used to evaluate the derivatives of the
dependent variable. Splines are functions defined by piecewise polynomial
arcs in such a way that derivatives up to and including the order
one less than the degree of polynomials used are continuous everywhere.
The natural cubic splines used in this study have the additional property
of minimum curvature which is analogous to minimum energy surface. These
and the derivative preserving properties of splines make them an excellent
tool for approximating the dependent variable surfaces in groundwater
flow problems.
Applications of the method to both a test situation as well as to
real -world data are given. It is shown that the method evaluates the
parameters, boundary conditions and inputs; that is, solves inverse problem
type V. General conditions of heterogeneity and anisotropy can be
evaluated. However, the method is not applicable to steady flows and has
the limitation that flow models in which the parameters are functions of
the dependent variable cannot be calibrated. In addition, at least one of
the parameters has to be preassigned a value.
A discussion of uncertainties in calibration procedures is given.
The related problems of model validation and sampling of aquifers are
also discussed. |
author2 |
Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona |
author_facet |
Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona Sagar, Budhi |
author |
Sagar, Budhi |
author_sort |
Sagar, Budhi |
title |
CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS |
title_short |
CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS |
title_full |
CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS |
title_fullStr |
CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS |
title_full_unstemmed |
CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS |
title_sort |
calibration and validation of aquifer models |
publisher |
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) |
publishDate |
1973 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/617585 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/617585 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sagarbudhi calibrationandvalidationofaquifermodels |
_version_ |
1718364164539285504 |