CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS

The main aim of this study is to develop a suitable method for the calibration and validation of mathematical models of large and complex aquifer systems. Since the calibration procedure depends on the nature of the model to be calibrated and since many kinds of models are used for groundwater,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sagar, Budhi
Other Authors: Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona
Language:en_US
Published: Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) 1973
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/617585
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/617585
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-617585
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6175852016-07-28T03:00:38Z CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS Sagar, Budhi Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona Groundwater -- Mathematical models. The main aim of this study is to develop a suitable method for the calibration and validation of mathematical models of large and complex aquifer systems. Since the calibration procedure depends on the nature of the model to be calibrated and since many kinds of models are used for groundwater, the question of model choice is broached first. Various aquifer models are critically reviewed and a table to compare them as to their capabilities and limitations is set up. The need for a general calibration method for models in which the flow is represented by partial differential equations is identified from this table. The calibration problem is formulated in the general mathematical framework as the inverse problem. Five types of inverse problems that exist in modeling aquifers by partial differential equations are identified. These are, to determine (1) parameters, (2) initial conditions, (3) boundary conditions, (4) inputs, and (5) a mixture of the above. Various methods to solve these inverse problems are reviewed, including those from fields other than hydrology. A new direct method to solve the inverse problem (DIMSIP) is then developed. Basically, this method consists of transforming the partial differential equations of flow to algebraic equations by substituting in them the values of the various derivatives of the dependent variable (which may be hydraulic pressure, chemical concentration or temperature). The parameters are then obtained by formulating the problem in a nonlinear optimization framework. The method of sequential unconstrained minimization is used. Spline functions are used to evaluate the derivatives of the dependent variable. Splines are functions defined by piecewise polynomial arcs in such a way that derivatives up to and including the order one less than the degree of polynomials used are continuous everywhere. The natural cubic splines used in this study have the additional property of minimum curvature which is analogous to minimum energy surface. These and the derivative preserving properties of splines make them an excellent tool for approximating the dependent variable surfaces in groundwater flow problems. Applications of the method to both a test situation as well as to real -world data are given. It is shown that the method evaluates the parameters, boundary conditions and inputs; that is, solves inverse problem type V. General conditions of heterogeneity and anisotropy can be evaluated. However, the method is not applicable to steady flows and has the limitation that flow models in which the parameters are functions of the dependent variable cannot be calibrated. In addition, at least one of the parameters has to be preassigned a value. A discussion of uncertainties in calibration procedures is given. The related problems of model validation and sampling of aquifers are also discussed. 1973-06 text Technical Report http://hdl.handle.net/10150/617585 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/617585 en_US Technical Reports on Hydrology and Water Resources, No. 17 Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Provided by the Department of Hydrology and Water Resources.
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Groundwater -- Mathematical models.
spellingShingle Groundwater -- Mathematical models.
Sagar, Budhi
CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS
description The main aim of this study is to develop a suitable method for the calibration and validation of mathematical models of large and complex aquifer systems. Since the calibration procedure depends on the nature of the model to be calibrated and since many kinds of models are used for groundwater, the question of model choice is broached first. Various aquifer models are critically reviewed and a table to compare them as to their capabilities and limitations is set up. The need for a general calibration method for models in which the flow is represented by partial differential equations is identified from this table. The calibration problem is formulated in the general mathematical framework as the inverse problem. Five types of inverse problems that exist in modeling aquifers by partial differential equations are identified. These are, to determine (1) parameters, (2) initial conditions, (3) boundary conditions, (4) inputs, and (5) a mixture of the above. Various methods to solve these inverse problems are reviewed, including those from fields other than hydrology. A new direct method to solve the inverse problem (DIMSIP) is then developed. Basically, this method consists of transforming the partial differential equations of flow to algebraic equations by substituting in them the values of the various derivatives of the dependent variable (which may be hydraulic pressure, chemical concentration or temperature). The parameters are then obtained by formulating the problem in a nonlinear optimization framework. The method of sequential unconstrained minimization is used. Spline functions are used to evaluate the derivatives of the dependent variable. Splines are functions defined by piecewise polynomial arcs in such a way that derivatives up to and including the order one less than the degree of polynomials used are continuous everywhere. The natural cubic splines used in this study have the additional property of minimum curvature which is analogous to minimum energy surface. These and the derivative preserving properties of splines make them an excellent tool for approximating the dependent variable surfaces in groundwater flow problems. Applications of the method to both a test situation as well as to real -world data are given. It is shown that the method evaluates the parameters, boundary conditions and inputs; that is, solves inverse problem type V. General conditions of heterogeneity and anisotropy can be evaluated. However, the method is not applicable to steady flows and has the limitation that flow models in which the parameters are functions of the dependent variable cannot be calibrated. In addition, at least one of the parameters has to be preassigned a value. A discussion of uncertainties in calibration procedures is given. The related problems of model validation and sampling of aquifers are also discussed.
author2 Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona
author_facet Department of Hydrology & Water Resources, The University of Arizona
Sagar, Budhi
author Sagar, Budhi
author_sort Sagar, Budhi
title CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS
title_short CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS
title_full CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS
title_fullStr CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS
title_full_unstemmed CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION OF AQUIFER MODELS
title_sort calibration and validation of aquifer models
publisher Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
publishDate 1973
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/617585
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/617585
work_keys_str_mv AT sagarbudhi calibrationandvalidationofaquifermodels
_version_ 1718364164539285504