A MODULAR TELECOMMUNICATION GEOPLATFORM CONCEPT
International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 13-15, 1981 / Bahia Hotel, San Diego, California === The paper describes a new GEO platform design with the special features of modularity and integrated transfer propulsion. It is a candidate for the 3000 kg-class of communication satell...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
International Foundation for Telemetering
1981
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/614000 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/614000 |
id |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-614000 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6140002016-06-23T03:01:32Z A MODULAR TELECOMMUNICATION GEOPLATFORM CONCEPT Koelle, D. E. Kleinau, W. MBB Space Division International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 13-15, 1981 / Bahia Hotel, San Diego, California The paper describes a new GEO platform design with the special features of modularity and integrated transfer propulsion. It is a candidate for the 3000 kg-class of communication satellites required for the next decade INTELSAT VII and multi-nation (TVBS). The technical results of a study performed for the German Ministry of Research and Technology (BMFT) are presented regarding the GEO platform and its performance in terms of communication payload and mission lifetime. The reference system design has a total launch mass of 14.3 Mg (metric tons) in LEO including 10.9 Mg transfer propellants mass. The initial mass in CEO is 3.4 Mg allowing for 400 to 700 kg communication equipment, depending on power level, eclipse capability requirements (batteries) and mission lifetime. The launch vehicle for this platform is the Space Shuttle, the associated launch cost would be only 20 Mio. Dollars (1980), without additional cost for any type of perigee or transfer stage. The platform propels itself from LEO (300 km) to the geosynchronous orbit with a 6 impulse transfer, provided by a 5 kN engine (1100 lbs thrust level). This launch mode - although not being the optimum from the performance standpoint - proves to be the most economic one, compared to other alternatives, by example Shuttle + Centaur, with some 52 Mio. Dollars (80) total launch cost. 1981-10 text Proceedings 0884-5123 0074-9079 http://hdl.handle.net/10150/614000 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/614000 International Telemetering Conference Proceedings en_US http://www.telemetry.org/ Copyright © International Foundation for Telemetering International Foundation for Telemetering |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 13-15, 1981 / Bahia Hotel, San Diego, California === The paper describes a new GEO platform design with the special features of modularity
and integrated transfer propulsion. It is a candidate for the 3000 kg-class of
communication satellites required for the next decade INTELSAT VII and multi-nation
(TVBS). The technical results of a study performed for the German Ministry of Research
and Technology (BMFT) are presented regarding the GEO platform and its performance in
terms of communication payload and mission lifetime.
The reference system design has a total launch mass of 14.3 Mg (metric tons) in LEO
including 10.9 Mg transfer propellants mass. The initial mass in CEO is 3.4 Mg allowing
for 400 to 700 kg communication equipment, depending on power level, eclipse capability
requirements (batteries) and mission lifetime.
The launch vehicle for this platform is the Space Shuttle, the associated launch cost would
be only 20 Mio. Dollars (1980), without additional cost for any type of perigee or transfer
stage. The platform propels itself from LEO (300 km) to the geosynchronous orbit with a 6
impulse transfer, provided by a 5 kN engine (1100 lbs thrust level). This launch mode -
although not being the optimum from the performance standpoint - proves to be the most
economic one, compared to other alternatives, by example Shuttle + Centaur, with some
52 Mio. Dollars (80) total launch cost. |
author2 |
MBB Space Division |
author_facet |
MBB Space Division Koelle, D. E. Kleinau, W. |
author |
Koelle, D. E. Kleinau, W. |
spellingShingle |
Koelle, D. E. Kleinau, W. A MODULAR TELECOMMUNICATION GEOPLATFORM CONCEPT |
author_sort |
Koelle, D. E. |
title |
A MODULAR TELECOMMUNICATION GEOPLATFORM CONCEPT |
title_short |
A MODULAR TELECOMMUNICATION GEOPLATFORM CONCEPT |
title_full |
A MODULAR TELECOMMUNICATION GEOPLATFORM CONCEPT |
title_fullStr |
A MODULAR TELECOMMUNICATION GEOPLATFORM CONCEPT |
title_full_unstemmed |
A MODULAR TELECOMMUNICATION GEOPLATFORM CONCEPT |
title_sort |
modular telecommunication geoplatform concept |
publisher |
International Foundation for Telemetering |
publishDate |
1981 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/614000 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/614000 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT koellede amodulartelecommunicationgeoplatformconcept AT kleinauw amodulartelecommunicationgeoplatformconcept AT koellede modulartelecommunicationgeoplatformconcept AT kleinauw modulartelecommunicationgeoplatformconcept |
_version_ |
1718320729429114880 |