Optimum Symbol Synchronization
International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 17-20, 1994 / Town & Country Hotel and Conference Center, San Diego, California === Although most closed-loop synchronizers employ maximum likelihood estimators for symbol value decisions, in general, their symbol timing estimates are n...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
International Foundation for Telemetering
1994
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/611676 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/611676 |
id |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-611676 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6116762016-06-08T03:01:39Z Optimum Symbol Synchronization James, Calvin L. AlliedSignal Technical Services Corporation International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 17-20, 1994 / Town & Country Hotel and Conference Center, San Diego, California Although most closed-loop synchronizers employ maximum likelihood estimators for symbol value decisions, in general, their symbol timing estimates are not optimum. It would seem only natural that an optimum timing estimator would choose interval partitions based on maximizing the observed sample signal-to-noise ratio. The symbol synchronizer described below achieves optimum performance when decisions on present symbol values are based on current and previously-received symbol samples. This procedure attempts to reestablish the interval independence criterion, thereby reducing timing estimator variance. The realization presented is motivated by an open-loop maximum a posteriori (MAP) structure analysis. 1994-10 text Proceedings 0884-5123 0074-9079 http://hdl.handle.net/10150/611676 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/611676 International Telemetering Conference Proceedings en_US http://www.telemetry.org/ Copyright © International Foundation for Telemetering International Foundation for Telemetering |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
International Telemetering Conference Proceedings / October 17-20, 1994 / Town & Country Hotel and Conference Center, San Diego, California === Although most closed-loop synchronizers employ maximum likelihood estimators for symbol value decisions, in general, their symbol timing estimates are not optimum. It would seem only natural that an optimum timing estimator would choose interval partitions based on maximizing the observed sample signal-to-noise ratio. The symbol synchronizer described below achieves optimum performance when decisions on present symbol values are based on current and previously-received symbol samples. This procedure attempts to reestablish the interval independence criterion, thereby reducing timing estimator variance. The realization presented is motivated by an open-loop maximum a posteriori (MAP) structure analysis. |
author2 |
AlliedSignal Technical Services Corporation |
author_facet |
AlliedSignal Technical Services Corporation James, Calvin L. |
author |
James, Calvin L. |
spellingShingle |
James, Calvin L. Optimum Symbol Synchronization |
author_sort |
James, Calvin L. |
title |
Optimum Symbol Synchronization |
title_short |
Optimum Symbol Synchronization |
title_full |
Optimum Symbol Synchronization |
title_fullStr |
Optimum Symbol Synchronization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optimum Symbol Synchronization |
title_sort |
optimum symbol synchronization |
publisher |
International Foundation for Telemetering |
publishDate |
1994 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/611676 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/611676 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jamescalvinl optimumsymbolsynchronization |
_version_ |
1718297110488547328 |