ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AS DESCRIBED BY MANAGERS THROUGH METAPHORS

Corporations spend a huge amount of money every year on implementing changes designed to improve organizational performance. It is well known that effective implementation of organizational change demands effective communication, and effective communication, in turn, relies heavily on the appropr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: French, Julianne Alise
Other Authors: Effken, Judith
Language:en_US
Published: The University of Arizona. 2003
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/610592
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/610592
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-610592
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6105922016-05-25T03:00:29Z ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AS DESCRIBED BY MANAGERS THROUGH METAPHORS French, Julianne Alise Effken, Judith Corporations spend a huge amount of money every year on implementing changes designed to improve organizational performance. It is well known that effective implementation of organizational change demands effective communication, and effective communication, in turn, relies heavily on the appropriate use of metaphors. Marshak has identified four categories of organizational change metaphors: fix and maintain, build and develop; move and relocate, and liberate and recreate. These four types are assumed to describe gradients in change ranging from a fairly simple change (fix and maintain) to a radical transformative change (liberate and recreate). Marshak has proposed that managers can utilize metaphors to facilitate organizational change and, further, that metaphors can be used to evaluate the degree of alignment of employee and manager understanding of an organizational change. As a preliminary test of Marshak's model, a secondary data analysis was done of 30 interviews conducted with managers in a large urban medical center undergoing a major organizational redesign process. The interviews were done at two points in time, early in the redesign effort and three years later. Fifteen interviews were selected from each of the two points in time for secondary analysis. Using standard content analysis procedures, change metaphors were identified in each interview and categorized either into one of Marshak's four categories or as "other." The results of the analysis showed that the predominant metaphor of change differed at the two points in time, and that the change was in the direction of a more complex change (specifically from "fix and maintain" to "build and develop. ") These findings provide preliminary empirical support for Marshaks' model. 2003 text Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) http://hdl.handle.net/10150/610592 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/610592 en_US Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. The University of Arizona. Arizona Health Sciences Library, uncataloged theses.
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
description Corporations spend a huge amount of money every year on implementing changes designed to improve organizational performance. It is well known that effective implementation of organizational change demands effective communication, and effective communication, in turn, relies heavily on the appropriate use of metaphors. Marshak has identified four categories of organizational change metaphors: fix and maintain, build and develop; move and relocate, and liberate and recreate. These four types are assumed to describe gradients in change ranging from a fairly simple change (fix and maintain) to a radical transformative change (liberate and recreate). Marshak has proposed that managers can utilize metaphors to facilitate organizational change and, further, that metaphors can be used to evaluate the degree of alignment of employee and manager understanding of an organizational change. As a preliminary test of Marshak's model, a secondary data analysis was done of 30 interviews conducted with managers in a large urban medical center undergoing a major organizational redesign process. The interviews were done at two points in time, early in the redesign effort and three years later. Fifteen interviews were selected from each of the two points in time for secondary analysis. Using standard content analysis procedures, change metaphors were identified in each interview and categorized either into one of Marshak's four categories or as "other." The results of the analysis showed that the predominant metaphor of change differed at the two points in time, and that the change was in the direction of a more complex change (specifically from "fix and maintain" to "build and develop. ") These findings provide preliminary empirical support for Marshaks' model.
author2 Effken, Judith
author_facet Effken, Judith
French, Julianne Alise
author French, Julianne Alise
spellingShingle French, Julianne Alise
ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AS DESCRIBED BY MANAGERS THROUGH METAPHORS
author_sort French, Julianne Alise
title ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AS DESCRIBED BY MANAGERS THROUGH METAPHORS
title_short ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AS DESCRIBED BY MANAGERS THROUGH METAPHORS
title_full ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AS DESCRIBED BY MANAGERS THROUGH METAPHORS
title_fullStr ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AS DESCRIBED BY MANAGERS THROUGH METAPHORS
title_full_unstemmed ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE AS DESCRIBED BY MANAGERS THROUGH METAPHORS
title_sort organizational change as described by managers through metaphors
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 2003
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/610592
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/610592
work_keys_str_mv AT frenchjuliannealise organizationalchangeasdescribedbymanagersthroughmetaphors
_version_ 1718279599204335616