How to Use Analog Telemetry to Produce Equipment with 100% Reliability
ITC/USA 2010 Conference Proceedings / The Forty-Sixth Annual International Telemetering Conference and Technical Exhibition / October 25-28, 2010 / Town and Country Resort & Convention Center, San Diego, California === Equipment reliability is driven by infant mortality failures, which can be el...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
International Foundation for Telemetering
2010
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/605961 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/605961 |
id |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-605961 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6059612016-04-21T03:01:10Z How to Use Analog Telemetry to Produce Equipment with 100% Reliability Losik, Len Failure Analysis ITC/USA 2010 Conference Proceedings / The Forty-Sixth Annual International Telemetering Conference and Technical Exhibition / October 25-28, 2010 / Town and Country Resort & Convention Center, San Diego, California Equipment reliability is driven by infant mortality failures, which can be eliminated using a prognostic analysis prior, during and/or after the exhaustive and comprehensive dynamic environmental factory acceptance testing which conducted to increase equipment reliability by identifying equipment that fails during test for repair/replacement. To move to the 100% reliability domain, equipment dynamic environmental factory testing should be followed by a prognostic analysis to identify the equipment that will fail within the first year of use. During all equipment testing, only equipment functional performance is measured and equipment performance is unrelated to short-term or long-term equipment reliability making testing alone inadequate to produce equipment with 100% reliability. A prognostic analysis converts performance measurements to reliability measurements invasively by sharing test data used to measure equipment performance. Performance data that is converted to reliability data provides a time-to-failure (TTF) in minutes/hours/days/months for equipment that will fail within the first year of use, allowing the production of equipment with 100% reliability, decreasing risk and making getting to space safe and reliable. 2010-10 text Proceedings 0884-5123 0074-9079 http://hdl.handle.net/10150/605961 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/605961 International Telemetering Conference Proceedings en_US http://www.telemetry.org/ Copyright © held by the author; distribution rights International Foundation for Telemetering International Foundation for Telemetering |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
ITC/USA 2010 Conference Proceedings / The Forty-Sixth Annual International Telemetering Conference and Technical Exhibition / October 25-28, 2010 / Town and Country Resort & Convention Center, San Diego, California === Equipment reliability is driven by infant mortality failures, which can be eliminated using a prognostic analysis prior, during and/or after the exhaustive and comprehensive dynamic environmental factory acceptance testing which conducted to increase equipment reliability by identifying equipment that fails during test for repair/replacement. To move to the 100% reliability domain, equipment dynamic environmental factory testing should be followed by a prognostic analysis to identify the equipment that will fail within the first year of use. During all equipment testing, only equipment functional performance is measured and equipment performance is unrelated to short-term or long-term equipment reliability making testing alone inadequate to produce equipment with 100% reliability. A prognostic analysis converts performance measurements to reliability measurements invasively by sharing test data used to measure equipment performance. Performance data that is converted to reliability data provides a time-to-failure (TTF) in minutes/hours/days/months for equipment that will fail within the first year of use, allowing the production of equipment with 100% reliability, decreasing risk and making getting to space safe and reliable. |
author2 |
Failure Analysis |
author_facet |
Failure Analysis Losik, Len |
author |
Losik, Len |
spellingShingle |
Losik, Len How to Use Analog Telemetry to Produce Equipment with 100% Reliability |
author_sort |
Losik, Len |
title |
How to Use Analog Telemetry to Produce Equipment with 100% Reliability |
title_short |
How to Use Analog Telemetry to Produce Equipment with 100% Reliability |
title_full |
How to Use Analog Telemetry to Produce Equipment with 100% Reliability |
title_fullStr |
How to Use Analog Telemetry to Produce Equipment with 100% Reliability |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to Use Analog Telemetry to Produce Equipment with 100% Reliability |
title_sort |
how to use analog telemetry to produce equipment with 100% reliability |
publisher |
International Foundation for Telemetering |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/605961 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/605961 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT losiklen howtouseanalogtelemetrytoproduceequipmentwith100reliability |
_version_ |
1718229218331983872 |