Indigenous Self-Government under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases

Contemporary events frequently call into question the status of state-recognized Native nations. For example, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) failed to pass a resolution dissolving state-recognized membership; and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has reported on the realit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hiraldo, Danielle Vedette
Other Authors: Hershey, Robert
Language:en_US
Published: The University of Arizona. 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/605217
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/605217
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-605217
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-6052172016-04-20T03:00:54Z Indigenous Self-Government under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases Hiraldo, Danielle Vedette Hershey, Robert Hershey, Robert Colombi, Benedict J. Cornell, Stephen Lomawaima, K. Tsianina Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina self-determination state-recognized tribes tribal-state relationships Waccamaw Indian People of South Carolina American Indian Studies Indigenous governance Contemporary events frequently call into question the status of state-recognized Native nations. For example, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) failed to pass a resolution dissolving state-recognized membership; and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has reported on the reality of federal funding being awarded to non-federally recognized Native nations. Although state-recognized Native nations are handicapped in their strategies and the availability of resources to assert their right to self-determine, some have persevered despite the inability to establish a direct relationship with the national government. Reconsidering federalism as it pertains to Native nations reveals opportunities for non-federally recognized Native nations to access resources and assert self-governing authority in alternative arenas outside the exclusive tribal-national government-to-government relationship. My research analyzes how two state-recognized Native nations, the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina and the Waccamaw Indian People of South Carolina, have operated as political actors; have maintained their communities; have organized politically and socially; and have asserted their right to self-determine by engaging state—and at certain times federal—politics to address needs within their communities. I used a qualitative case study approach to examine the strategies these two state-recognized Native nations have developed to engage state relationships. I argue that state-recognized Native nations are developing significant political relationships with their home states and other entities, such as federal, state, and local agencies, and nonprofits, to address issues in their communities. 2015 text Electronic Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/10150/605217 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/605217 en_US Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina
self-determination
state-recognized tribes
tribal-state relationships
Waccamaw Indian People of South Carolina
American Indian Studies
Indigenous governance
spellingShingle Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina
self-determination
state-recognized tribes
tribal-state relationships
Waccamaw Indian People of South Carolina
American Indian Studies
Indigenous governance
Hiraldo, Danielle Vedette
Indigenous Self-Government under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases
description Contemporary events frequently call into question the status of state-recognized Native nations. For example, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) failed to pass a resolution dissolving state-recognized membership; and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has reported on the reality of federal funding being awarded to non-federally recognized Native nations. Although state-recognized Native nations are handicapped in their strategies and the availability of resources to assert their right to self-determine, some have persevered despite the inability to establish a direct relationship with the national government. Reconsidering federalism as it pertains to Native nations reveals opportunities for non-federally recognized Native nations to access resources and assert self-governing authority in alternative arenas outside the exclusive tribal-national government-to-government relationship. My research analyzes how two state-recognized Native nations, the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina and the Waccamaw Indian People of South Carolina, have operated as political actors; have maintained their communities; have organized politically and socially; and have asserted their right to self-determine by engaging state—and at certain times federal—politics to address needs within their communities. I used a qualitative case study approach to examine the strategies these two state-recognized Native nations have developed to engage state relationships. I argue that state-recognized Native nations are developing significant political relationships with their home states and other entities, such as federal, state, and local agencies, and nonprofits, to address issues in their communities.
author2 Hershey, Robert
author_facet Hershey, Robert
Hiraldo, Danielle Vedette
author Hiraldo, Danielle Vedette
author_sort Hiraldo, Danielle Vedette
title Indigenous Self-Government under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases
title_short Indigenous Self-Government under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases
title_full Indigenous Self-Government under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases
title_fullStr Indigenous Self-Government under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous Self-Government under State Recognition: Comparing Strategies in Two Cases
title_sort indigenous self-government under state recognition: comparing strategies in two cases
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/605217
http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/605217
work_keys_str_mv AT hiraldodaniellevedette indigenousselfgovernmentunderstaterecognitioncomparingstrategiesintwocases
_version_ 1718227816651161600