PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS WHEN IMPLEMENTING TURBO PRODUCT CODE FORWARD ERROR CORRECTION FOR AIRBORNE TELEMETRY
ITC/USA 2005 Conference Proceedings / The Forty-First Annual International Telemetering Conference and Technical Exhibition / October 24-27, 2005 / Riviera Hotel & Convention Center, Las Vegas, Nevada === Hardware implementing forward error correction (FEC) is currently available for utilization...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Language: | en_US |
| Published: |
International Foundation for Telemetering
2005
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/604798 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/604798 |
| Summary: | ITC/USA 2005 Conference Proceedings / The Forty-First Annual International Telemetering Conference and Technical Exhibition / October 24-27, 2005 / Riviera Hotel & Convention Center, Las Vegas, Nevada === Hardware implementing forward error correction (FEC) is currently available for utilization by the
airborne telemetry system designer. This paper will discuss the potential benefits along with drawbacks
when using this technology. Laboratory testing is supplemented with real-world flight testing.
Performance results comparing FEC and non-FEC systems are presented for both IRIG-106 Pulse Code
Modulation/Frequency Modulation, PCM/FM, (or Continuous Phase Frequency Shift Keying, CPFSK,
with filtering, or ARTM Tier 0) and Shaped Offset Quadrature Phase Shift Keying, Telemetry Group
version (SOQPSK-TG or ARTM Tier I) waveforms. |
|---|