Outcomes for Epithelial Ovarian Cancers Diagnosed with Concomitant Venous Thromboembolism
A Thesis submitted to The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine. === Background and Significance Most large studies on venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence in gynecologic cancer focus on prevention and...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
The University of Arizona.
2016
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/603656 http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/603656 |
Summary: | A Thesis submitted to The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine. === Background and Significance
Most large studies on venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence in gynecologic cancer focus on
prevention and management of postoperative VTE. Treatment for preexisting VTE at the time
of diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) includes careful risk assessments, weighing the
benefits of debulking and risks of anticoagulation in the setting of a new VTE and new EOC
diagnosis, respectively. We aimed to describe perioperative and cancer survival outcomes
associated with concomitant diagnoses.
Research Question
To describe short‐term perioperative outcomes and overall survival (OS) among women who
present with VTE at initial EOC diagnosis.
Methods
Women presenting with VTE within 30 days prior to EOC diagnosis between 1/2/2003 and
12/30/2011 who had primary debulking surgery (PDS) or chemotherapy (CT) alone were
included. Descriptive statistics and the Kaplan‐Meier method were used to estimate OS from
time of EOC diagnosis, with patient characteristics and process‐of‐care variables retrospectively
abstracted.
Results
Of the 36 women with VTE within 30 days prior to EOC diagnosis, 28 (77.8%; mean age 64.2
years) underwent PDS and 8 (22.2%; mean age 61.4 years) received CT alone. Eastern
Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was ≤2 in 85.7% (n=24) of PDS
patients compared to 62.5% (n=5) of CT patients. Advanced stage (III/IV) disease was diagnosed
in 71.4% (n=20) of PDS group; all CT patients were advanced stage. Among those who
underwent PDS, 26 (92.9%) had a preoperative IVC filter placed; 1 (12.5%) in the CT group
received an IVC filter. Perioperative bleeding complications were 7.2% in the PDS group. Within
the PDS group, median OS was 25.6 months while the CT group had median OS of 4.5 months.ConclusionsPreoperative VTE in EOC patients can be safely managed with low rates of bleeding complications. Poor OS in CT group may reflect worse overall health or more aggressive cancer. Median OS was notably shorter than previously published; IVC filter utilization on oncologicoutcomes in EOC warrants further investigation. |
---|