Teacher and Peer Written Feedback in the ESL Composition Classroom: Appropriation, Stance, and Authorship

While studies have shown that teacher and peer feedback are beneficial to students, research has also found that teachers can appropriate students' texts in their feedback, taking away authorship in the process (Brannon & Knoblauch, 1982; Goldstein, 2004). The present study addressed the ty...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fordham, Sonja K.
Other Authors: Waugh, Linda R.
Language:en_US
Published: The University of Arizona. 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/577518
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-577518
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-5775182015-10-23T05:47:19Z Teacher and Peer Written Feedback in the ESL Composition Classroom: Appropriation, Stance, and Authorship Fordham, Sonja K. Waugh, Linda R. Waugh, Linda R. Waugh, Linda R. Panferov, Suzanne K. Tardy, Christine M. Warner, Chantelle N. L2 writing peer feedback student response teacher feedback text appropriation Second Language Acquisition & Teaching ESL students While studies have shown that teacher and peer feedback are beneficial to students, research has also found that teachers can appropriate students' texts in their feedback, taking away authorship in the process (Brannon & Knoblauch, 1982; Goldstein, 2004). The present study addressed the type of written feedback that I gave my ESL composition students and the type of feedback they gave each other during the writing process, and it examined their responses to the feedback they received. As the response stance taken when providing feedback is a determiner of the level of control the feedback conveys (Straub & Lunsford, 1995), I investigated the stances that both I and my students took while providing feedback. Since my goal had been to avoid text appropriation, I wanted to learn if I was successful in taking a less controlling stance in the feedback that I gave to my students. In addition, I wanted to discover whether the stance my students took while giving feedback would change over the course of the semester. Further, I used a consciousness-raising pedagogical tool — the Cover Sheet — to examine the responses of the students to the feedback to determine if they thought critically about the feedback they had received. At the end of the study, I discovered that my intention to only provide feedback that was not considered controlling was too idealistic and that at least for ESL students, it is easier to understand feedback if it is more direct. Additionally, I found that those students who had an easier time understanding the feedback I gave them and used it to revise their papers ended up getting a higher grade in the course. 2015 text Electronic Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/10150/577518 en_US Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic L2 writing
peer feedback
student response
teacher feedback
text appropriation
Second Language Acquisition & Teaching
ESL students
spellingShingle L2 writing
peer feedback
student response
teacher feedback
text appropriation
Second Language Acquisition & Teaching
ESL students
Fordham, Sonja K.
Teacher and Peer Written Feedback in the ESL Composition Classroom: Appropriation, Stance, and Authorship
description While studies have shown that teacher and peer feedback are beneficial to students, research has also found that teachers can appropriate students' texts in their feedback, taking away authorship in the process (Brannon & Knoblauch, 1982; Goldstein, 2004). The present study addressed the type of written feedback that I gave my ESL composition students and the type of feedback they gave each other during the writing process, and it examined their responses to the feedback they received. As the response stance taken when providing feedback is a determiner of the level of control the feedback conveys (Straub & Lunsford, 1995), I investigated the stances that both I and my students took while providing feedback. Since my goal had been to avoid text appropriation, I wanted to learn if I was successful in taking a less controlling stance in the feedback that I gave to my students. In addition, I wanted to discover whether the stance my students took while giving feedback would change over the course of the semester. Further, I used a consciousness-raising pedagogical tool — the Cover Sheet — to examine the responses of the students to the feedback to determine if they thought critically about the feedback they had received. At the end of the study, I discovered that my intention to only provide feedback that was not considered controlling was too idealistic and that at least for ESL students, it is easier to understand feedback if it is more direct. Additionally, I found that those students who had an easier time understanding the feedback I gave them and used it to revise their papers ended up getting a higher grade in the course.
author2 Waugh, Linda R.
author_facet Waugh, Linda R.
Fordham, Sonja K.
author Fordham, Sonja K.
author_sort Fordham, Sonja K.
title Teacher and Peer Written Feedback in the ESL Composition Classroom: Appropriation, Stance, and Authorship
title_short Teacher and Peer Written Feedback in the ESL Composition Classroom: Appropriation, Stance, and Authorship
title_full Teacher and Peer Written Feedback in the ESL Composition Classroom: Appropriation, Stance, and Authorship
title_fullStr Teacher and Peer Written Feedback in the ESL Composition Classroom: Appropriation, Stance, and Authorship
title_full_unstemmed Teacher and Peer Written Feedback in the ESL Composition Classroom: Appropriation, Stance, and Authorship
title_sort teacher and peer written feedback in the esl composition classroom: appropriation, stance, and authorship
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/577518
work_keys_str_mv AT fordhamsonjak teacherandpeerwrittenfeedbackintheeslcompositionclassroomappropriationstanceandauthorship
_version_ 1718109916552495104