Chollas, Circles and Seris: Did Seri Indians Plant Cactus at Circle 6

On November 26, 1966, during an archaeological survey, one of us (Bowen) and Stephen D. Hayden discovered a circle of stones on Punta Santa Rosa, a prominent point of land on the coast of mainland Sonora, Mexico (Figure 1 ). This in itself was not remarkable because they had encountered other circle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bowen, Thomas, Felger, Richard S., Hills, R. James
Other Authors: The Southwest Center, University of Arizona
Language:en_US
Published: University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) 2004
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555914
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-555914
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-5559142015-10-23T05:43:08Z Chollas, Circles and Seris: Did Seri Indians Plant Cactus at Circle 6 Bowen, Thomas Felger, Richard S. Hills, R. James The Southwest Center, University of Arizona Drylands Institute Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum On November 26, 1966, during an archaeological survey, one of us (Bowen) and Stephen D. Hayden discovered a circle of stones on Punta Santa Rosa, a prominent point of land on the coast of mainland Sonora, Mexico (Figure 1 ). This in itself was not remarkable because they had encountered other circles previously. What was noteworthy was that this particular circle was surrounded by a ring of small jumping cholla cacti (Cylindropuntia fulgida var. fulgida) that seemed obviously planted. Punta Santa Rosa lies within the historic territory of the Seri (or Comcaac) Indians, and Bowen and Hayden knew that the Seris had used stone circles as part of the traditional vision quest. But since the Seris were considered a nonagricultural hunting-gathering-fishing people, the association of a presumably Seri circle with cacti that appeared intentionally planted seemed incongruous. At that time, however, Bowen and Hayden did nothing more with this odd feature than photograph it, give it the prosaic designation "Circle 6", and pass it off in an archaeological report as probably just an unusual Seri vision ring (Bowen 1976: 40). They did not anticipate that Circle 6 would continue to pose an ethnobotanical puzzle and one day provide an object lesson in archaeological interpretation. But puzzle it was. In this paper we reexamine Circle 6 in light of the known history of Seri planting. We consider several hypotheses, some of them proposed by modern Seris, about the circle's age, cultural identity, and function. We conclude that the original interpretation of Circle 6 as a vision ring is incorrect but that the peculiar cholla ring most likely does constitute a case of purposeful Seri planting. 2004-12 Article 0734-3434 http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555914 Desert Plants en_US Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) CALS Publications Archive. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
description On November 26, 1966, during an archaeological survey, one of us (Bowen) and Stephen D. Hayden discovered a circle of stones on Punta Santa Rosa, a prominent point of land on the coast of mainland Sonora, Mexico (Figure 1 ). This in itself was not remarkable because they had encountered other circles previously. What was noteworthy was that this particular circle was surrounded by a ring of small jumping cholla cacti (Cylindropuntia fulgida var. fulgida) that seemed obviously planted. Punta Santa Rosa lies within the historic territory of the Seri (or Comcaac) Indians, and Bowen and Hayden knew that the Seris had used stone circles as part of the traditional vision quest. But since the Seris were considered a nonagricultural hunting-gathering-fishing people, the association of a presumably Seri circle with cacti that appeared intentionally planted seemed incongruous. At that time, however, Bowen and Hayden did nothing more with this odd feature than photograph it, give it the prosaic designation "Circle 6", and pass it off in an archaeological report as probably just an unusual Seri vision ring (Bowen 1976: 40). They did not anticipate that Circle 6 would continue to pose an ethnobotanical puzzle and one day provide an object lesson in archaeological interpretation. But puzzle it was. In this paper we reexamine Circle 6 in light of the known history of Seri planting. We consider several hypotheses, some of them proposed by modern Seris, about the circle's age, cultural identity, and function. We conclude that the original interpretation of Circle 6 as a vision ring is incorrect but that the peculiar cholla ring most likely does constitute a case of purposeful Seri planting.
author2 The Southwest Center, University of Arizona
author_facet The Southwest Center, University of Arizona
Bowen, Thomas
Felger, Richard S.
Hills, R. James
author Bowen, Thomas
Felger, Richard S.
Hills, R. James
spellingShingle Bowen, Thomas
Felger, Richard S.
Hills, R. James
Chollas, Circles and Seris: Did Seri Indians Plant Cactus at Circle 6
author_sort Bowen, Thomas
title Chollas, Circles and Seris: Did Seri Indians Plant Cactus at Circle 6
title_short Chollas, Circles and Seris: Did Seri Indians Plant Cactus at Circle 6
title_full Chollas, Circles and Seris: Did Seri Indians Plant Cactus at Circle 6
title_fullStr Chollas, Circles and Seris: Did Seri Indians Plant Cactus at Circle 6
title_full_unstemmed Chollas, Circles and Seris: Did Seri Indians Plant Cactus at Circle 6
title_sort chollas, circles and seris: did seri indians plant cactus at circle 6
publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
publishDate 2004
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555914
work_keys_str_mv AT bowenthomas chollascirclesandserisdidseriindiansplantcactusatcircle6
AT felgerrichards chollascirclesandserisdidseriindiansplantcactusatcircle6
AT hillsrjames chollascirclesandserisdidseriindiansplantcactusatcircle6
_version_ 1718109116295020544