Man-Nature Attitudes of Arizona Water Resource Leaders

From the Proceedings of the 1972 Meetings of the Arizona Section - American Water Resources Assn. and the Hydrology Section - Arizona Academy of Science - May 5-6, 1972, Prescott, Arizona === A pilot study is developed to construct a scale which measures attitude towards human management in Arizona....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanerva, Roger A., King, David A.
Other Authors: Department of Water Resources, Annapolis, Maryland
Language:en_US
Published: Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 1972
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/300139
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-300139
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-3001392015-10-23T05:24:00Z Man-Nature Attitudes of Arizona Water Resource Leaders Kanerva, Roger A. King, David A. Department of Water Resources, Annapolis, Maryland Department of Watershed Management, University of Arizona, Tucson Hydrology -- Arizona. Water resources development -- Arizona. Hydrology -- Southwestern states. Water resources development -- Southwestern states. Attitudes Arizona Water resources Administration Decision making Environment Cultures Input-output analysis Scaling Water management (applied) Arid lands From the Proceedings of the 1972 Meetings of the Arizona Section - American Water Resources Assn. and the Hydrology Section - Arizona Academy of Science - May 5-6, 1972, Prescott, Arizona A pilot study is developed to construct a scale which measures attitude towards human management in Arizona. The decision-maker's attitudes toward his man-made and natural environments are investigated in terms of cultural (interior), natural (intermediate), and balanced (exterior) reference positions. A decision-making model consists of stimuli (inputs), decision-making (process function), and response (outputs). The 12 questions developed and applied to Arizona water managers were reduced to 8 capable scalogram analysis. These scaled questions related to favoring physical or emotional needs of man, deciding who gets what or increasing the supply, including behavioral patterns, protecting environmental areas, manipulation of resources as harmful or beneficial, municipal and industrial demands, opinions of groups, and possible overuse of resources. The scale met 5 criteria, which are defined by reproducibility, non-scale pattern of response, number of questions, error ratio and cross checking of responses. This study may provide managers with means of objectively evaluating and improving decisions. 1972-05-06 text Proceedings 0272-6106 http://hdl.handle.net/10150/300139 Hydrology and Water Resources in Arizona and the Southwest en_US Copyright ©, where appropriate, is held by the author. Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Hydrology -- Arizona.
Water resources development -- Arizona.
Hydrology -- Southwestern states.
Water resources development -- Southwestern states.
Attitudes
Arizona
Water resources
Administration
Decision making
Environment
Cultures
Input-output analysis
Scaling
Water management (applied)
Arid lands
spellingShingle Hydrology -- Arizona.
Water resources development -- Arizona.
Hydrology -- Southwestern states.
Water resources development -- Southwestern states.
Attitudes
Arizona
Water resources
Administration
Decision making
Environment
Cultures
Input-output analysis
Scaling
Water management (applied)
Arid lands
Kanerva, Roger A.
King, David A.
Man-Nature Attitudes of Arizona Water Resource Leaders
description From the Proceedings of the 1972 Meetings of the Arizona Section - American Water Resources Assn. and the Hydrology Section - Arizona Academy of Science - May 5-6, 1972, Prescott, Arizona === A pilot study is developed to construct a scale which measures attitude towards human management in Arizona. The decision-maker's attitudes toward his man-made and natural environments are investigated in terms of cultural (interior), natural (intermediate), and balanced (exterior) reference positions. A decision-making model consists of stimuli (inputs), decision-making (process function), and response (outputs). The 12 questions developed and applied to Arizona water managers were reduced to 8 capable scalogram analysis. These scaled questions related to favoring physical or emotional needs of man, deciding who gets what or increasing the supply, including behavioral patterns, protecting environmental areas, manipulation of resources as harmful or beneficial, municipal and industrial demands, opinions of groups, and possible overuse of resources. The scale met 5 criteria, which are defined by reproducibility, non-scale pattern of response, number of questions, error ratio and cross checking of responses. This study may provide managers with means of objectively evaluating and improving decisions.
author2 Department of Water Resources, Annapolis, Maryland
author_facet Department of Water Resources, Annapolis, Maryland
Kanerva, Roger A.
King, David A.
author Kanerva, Roger A.
King, David A.
author_sort Kanerva, Roger A.
title Man-Nature Attitudes of Arizona Water Resource Leaders
title_short Man-Nature Attitudes of Arizona Water Resource Leaders
title_full Man-Nature Attitudes of Arizona Water Resource Leaders
title_fullStr Man-Nature Attitudes of Arizona Water Resource Leaders
title_full_unstemmed Man-Nature Attitudes of Arizona Water Resource Leaders
title_sort man-nature attitudes of arizona water resource leaders
publisher Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science
publishDate 1972
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/300139
work_keys_str_mv AT kanervarogera mannatureattitudesofarizonawaterresourceleaders
AT kingdavida mannatureattitudesofarizonawaterresourceleaders
_version_ 1718105749690777600