An Evaluation of the BioHumaNeticsᴿ Plant Growth Substance

The 1985 and 1986 Cotton Reports have the same publication and P-Series numbers. === Plant growth substances and fertilizers from BioHumaNeticsᴿ were evaluated under field conditions on DPL 61 at the University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center in 1985. Treatments included: 1)standard fertiliz...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Hofmann, W. C., Else, P. T.
Language:	en_US
Published:	College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) 1986
Subjects:	Agriculture > Arizona Cotton > Arizona Cotton > Physiology and growth regulation
Online Access:	http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219738

id	ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-219738
record_format	oai_dc
spelling	ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-2197382015-10-23T04:54:12Z An Evaluation of the BioHumaNeticsᴿ Plant Growth Substance Hofmann, W. C. Else, P. T. Agriculture -- Arizona Cotton -- Arizona Cotton -- Physiology and growth regulation The 1985 and 1986 Cotton Reports have the same publication and P-Series numbers. Plant growth substances and fertilizers from BioHumaNeticsᴿ were evaluated under field conditions on DPL 61 at the University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center in 1985. Treatments included: 1)standard fertilization recommended for the farm, 2)no added fertilizers and 3)a treatment schedule prescribed by BioHumaNetics. No statistically significant differences were detected. 1986-03 text Article http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219738 Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report en_US 370063 Series P-63 College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
collection	NDLTD
language	en_US
sources	NDLTD
topic	Agriculture -- Arizona Cotton -- Arizona Cotton -- Physiology and growth regulation
spellingShingle	Agriculture -- Arizona Cotton -- Arizona Cotton -- Physiology and growth regulation Hofmann, W. C. Else, P. T. An Evaluation of the BioHumaNeticsᴿ Plant Growth Substance
description	The 1985 and 1986 Cotton Reports have the same publication and P-Series numbers. === Plant growth substances and fertilizers from BioHumaNeticsᴿ were evaluated under field conditions on DPL 61 at the University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center in 1985. Treatments included: 1)standard fertilization recommended for the farm, 2)no added fertilizers and 3)a treatment schedule prescribed by BioHumaNetics. No statistically significant differences were detected.
author	Hofmann, W. C. Else, P. T.
author_facet	Hofmann, W. C. Else, P. T.
author_sort	Hofmann, W. C.
title	An Evaluation of the BioHumaNeticsᴿ Plant Growth Substance
title_short	An Evaluation of the BioHumaNeticsᴿ Plant Growth Substance
title_full	An Evaluation of the BioHumaNeticsᴿ Plant Growth Substance
title_fullStr	An Evaluation of the BioHumaNeticsᴿ Plant Growth Substance
title_full_unstemmed	An Evaluation of the BioHumaNeticsᴿ Plant Growth Substance
title_sort	evaluation of the biohumaneticsᴿ plant growth substance
publisher	College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
publishDate	1986
url	http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219738
work_keys_str_mv	AT hofmannwc anevaluationofthebiohumaneticsrplantgrowthsubstance AT elsept anevaluationofthebiohumaneticsrplantgrowthsubstance AT hofmannwc evaluationofthebiohumaneticsrplantgrowthsubstance AT elsept evaluationofthebiohumaneticsrplantgrowthsubstance
_version_	1718101184473989120

An Evaluation of the BioHumaNeticsᴿ Plant Growth Substance

Similar Items