Upland Cotton Variety Resposne to Row Spacing
An Upland cotton row spacing study evaluation 30 in. vs. 38 in. rows was conducted in the Gila Valley of western Maricopa County in 1993. In addition, six Upland varieties were also evaluated on both the 30 and 38 in. row configurations. There were no row spacing differences in yield among five of t...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
1994
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/209591 |
id |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-209591 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-2095912015-10-23T04:49:47Z Upland Cotton Variety Resposne to Row Spacing Husman, S. H. Silvertooth, J. C. Jech, L. E. Wegener, R. Silvertooth, Jeff Agriculture -- Arizona Cotton -- Arizona Cotton -- Crop management An Upland cotton row spacing study evaluation 30 in. vs. 38 in. rows was conducted in the Gila Valley of western Maricopa County in 1993. In addition, six Upland varieties were also evaluated on both the 30 and 38 in. row configurations. There were no row spacing differences in yield among five of the six varieties. Sure Grow 1001 had significantly lower lint yields when produced on 30 In. rows. DPL 5415 had significantly higher lint yields that the other five tested varieties on 38 in. rows. There were no variety differences in the 30 in. rows. 1994-03 text Article http://hdl.handle.net/10150/209591 Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report en_US 370096 Series P-96 College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Agriculture -- Arizona Cotton -- Arizona Cotton -- Crop management |
spellingShingle |
Agriculture -- Arizona Cotton -- Arizona Cotton -- Crop management Husman, S. H. Silvertooth, J. C. Jech, L. E. Wegener, R. Upland Cotton Variety Resposne to Row Spacing |
description |
An Upland cotton row spacing study evaluation 30 in. vs. 38 in. rows was conducted in the Gila Valley of western Maricopa County in 1993. In addition, six Upland varieties were also evaluated on both the 30 and 38 in. row configurations. There were no row spacing differences in yield among five of the six varieties. Sure Grow 1001 had significantly lower lint yields when produced on 30 In. rows. DPL 5415 had significantly higher lint yields that the other five tested varieties on 38 in. rows. There were no variety differences in the 30 in. rows. |
author2 |
Silvertooth, Jeff |
author_facet |
Silvertooth, Jeff Husman, S. H. Silvertooth, J. C. Jech, L. E. Wegener, R. |
author |
Husman, S. H. Silvertooth, J. C. Jech, L. E. Wegener, R. |
author_sort |
Husman, S. H. |
title |
Upland Cotton Variety Resposne to Row Spacing |
title_short |
Upland Cotton Variety Resposne to Row Spacing |
title_full |
Upland Cotton Variety Resposne to Row Spacing |
title_fullStr |
Upland Cotton Variety Resposne to Row Spacing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Upland Cotton Variety Resposne to Row Spacing |
title_sort |
upland cotton variety resposne to row spacing |
publisher |
College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) |
publishDate |
1994 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/209591 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT husmansh uplandcottonvarietyresposnetorowspacing AT silvertoothjc uplandcottonvarietyresposnetorowspacing AT jechle uplandcottonvarietyresposnetorowspacing AT wegenerr uplandcottonvarietyresposnetorowspacing |
_version_ |
1718100551748550656 |