Comparison of Three Irrigation Scheduling Methods and Evaluation of Irrigation Leaching Characteristics
Three methods were used to schedule irrigations during the 1990 growing season on replicated plots at the Maricopa Ag Center using DPL 90 cotton. This is the final report of the research initiated in 1988. The three methods were: a soil water balance model based on historic consumptive use curves (E...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
1991
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/208344 |
id |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-208344 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-2083442015-10-23T04:49:18Z Comparison of Three Irrigation Scheduling Methods and Evaluation of Irrigation Leaching Characteristics Scherer, Tom Slack, Don Watson, Jack Fox, Fred Silvertooth, Jeff Bantlin, Marguerite Agriculture -- Arizona Cotton -- Arizona Cotton -- Irrigation Three methods were used to schedule irrigations during the 1990 growing season on replicated plots at the Maricopa Ag Center using DPL 90 cotton. This is the final report of the research initiated in 1988. The three methods were: a soil water balance model based on historic consumptive use curves (ERIE), a soil water balance model (AZSCHED) based on the Modified Penman Equation and daily weather (AZMET), and infrared thermometry using the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI). A potassium- bromide conservative tracer was applied at selected sites in the plots to evaluate leaching characteristics. The irrigation scheduling test was again duplicated at the Safford Experiment Station and is presented in another report. Results from this years data indicate that there was no significant difference in yield between the 3 methods. Also, there was no significant difference in the amount of applied irrigation water. The AZSCHED and ERIE methods will be developed into Extension educational tools and released for use by growers. 1991 text Article http://hdl.handle.net/10150/208344 Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report en_US 370087 Series P-87 College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Agriculture -- Arizona Cotton -- Arizona Cotton -- Irrigation |
spellingShingle |
Agriculture -- Arizona Cotton -- Arizona Cotton -- Irrigation Scherer, Tom Slack, Don Watson, Jack Fox, Fred Comparison of Three Irrigation Scheduling Methods and Evaluation of Irrigation Leaching Characteristics |
description |
Three methods were used to schedule irrigations during the 1990 growing season on replicated plots at the Maricopa Ag Center using DPL 90 cotton. This is the final report of the research initiated in 1988. The three methods were: a soil water balance model based on historic consumptive use curves (ERIE), a soil water balance model (AZSCHED) based on the Modified Penman Equation and daily weather (AZMET), and infrared thermometry using the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI). A potassium- bromide conservative tracer was applied at selected sites in the plots to evaluate leaching characteristics. The irrigation scheduling test was again duplicated at the Safford Experiment Station and is presented in another report. Results from this years data indicate that there was no significant difference in yield between the 3 methods. Also, there was no significant difference in the amount of applied irrigation water. The AZSCHED and ERIE methods will be developed into Extension educational tools and released for use by growers. |
author2 |
Silvertooth, Jeff |
author_facet |
Silvertooth, Jeff Scherer, Tom Slack, Don Watson, Jack Fox, Fred |
author |
Scherer, Tom Slack, Don Watson, Jack Fox, Fred |
author_sort |
Scherer, Tom |
title |
Comparison of Three Irrigation Scheduling Methods and Evaluation of Irrigation Leaching Characteristics |
title_short |
Comparison of Three Irrigation Scheduling Methods and Evaluation of Irrigation Leaching Characteristics |
title_full |
Comparison of Three Irrigation Scheduling Methods and Evaluation of Irrigation Leaching Characteristics |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Three Irrigation Scheduling Methods and Evaluation of Irrigation Leaching Characteristics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Three Irrigation Scheduling Methods and Evaluation of Irrigation Leaching Characteristics |
title_sort |
comparison of three irrigation scheduling methods and evaluation of irrigation leaching characteristics |
publisher |
College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) |
publishDate |
1991 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10150/208344 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT scherertom comparisonofthreeirrigationschedulingmethodsandevaluationofirrigationleachingcharacteristics AT slackdon comparisonofthreeirrigationschedulingmethodsandevaluationofirrigationleachingcharacteristics AT watsonjack comparisonofthreeirrigationschedulingmethodsandevaluationofirrigationleachingcharacteristics AT foxfred comparisonofthreeirrigationschedulingmethodsandevaluationofirrigationleachingcharacteristics |
_version_ |
1718100501784952832 |