Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999

Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999

Two field experiments were conducted near Marana and Coolidge, AZ in 1999 to evaluate the effectiveness of a number of defoliation treatments on Upland (var. DP 33b and AP 6101) cotton. All treatments consisted of materials commercially available in Arizona. Results reinforce general recommendations...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silvertooth, J. C., Norton, E. R.
Other Authors: Silvertooth, Jeff
Language:en_US
Published: College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) 2000
Subjects:
Agriculture > Arizona
Cotton > Arizona
Crop management
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/197458
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-197458
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-1974582015-10-23T04:44:13Z Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999 Silvertooth, J. C. Norton, E. R. Silvertooth, Jeff Agriculture -- Arizona Cotton -- Arizona Crop management Two field experiments were conducted near Marana and Coolidge, AZ in 1999 to evaluate the effectiveness of a number of defoliation treatments on Upland (var. DP 33b and AP 6101) cotton. All treatments consisted of materials commercially available in Arizona. Results reinforce general recommendations regarding the use of low rates (relative to the label ranges) under warm weather conditions and increasing rates as temperatures cool. Defoliation treatments of Ginstar alone did a satisfactory job of defoliation and regrowth/topgrowth contol and were very similar to treatments including Prep or Integrate. Adding Prep or Integrate to Ginstar in this experiment did not improve defoliation or topgrowth control. 2000 text Article http://hdl.handle.net/10150/197458 Cotton: A College of Agriculture Report en_US AZ1170 College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Agriculture -- Arizona
Cotton -- Arizona
Crop management
spellingShingle Agriculture -- Arizona
Cotton -- Arizona
Crop management
Silvertooth, J. C.
Norton, E. R.
Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999
description Two field experiments were conducted near Marana and Coolidge, AZ in 1999 to evaluate the effectiveness of a number of defoliation treatments on Upland (var. DP 33b and AP 6101) cotton. All treatments consisted of materials commercially available in Arizona. Results reinforce general recommendations regarding the use of low rates (relative to the label ranges) under warm weather conditions and increasing rates as temperatures cool. Defoliation treatments of Ginstar alone did a satisfactory job of defoliation and regrowth/topgrowth contol and were very similar to treatments including Prep or Integrate. Adding Prep or Integrate to Ginstar in this experiment did not improve defoliation or topgrowth control.
author2 Silvertooth, Jeff
author_facet Silvertooth, Jeff
Silvertooth, J. C.
Norton, E. R.
author Silvertooth, J. C.
Norton, E. R.
author_sort Silvertooth, J. C.
title Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999
title_short Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999
title_full Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999
title_fullStr Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999
title_full_unstemmed Cotton Defoliation Evaluations, 1999
title_sort cotton defoliation evaluations, 1999
publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ)
publishDate 2000
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/197458
work_keys_str_mv AT silvertoothjc cottondefoliationevaluations1999
AT nortoner cottondefoliationevaluations1999
_version_ 1718099863992795136

Similar Items