Disability and Type/Level of Offense Committed by Juveniles Transferred versus Not Transferred to the Adult Court System

The purpose of this study was to compare two groups of males in Arizona Department of Corrections (ADJC) custody with regard to three factors. The first group consisted of youth sentenced to ADJC who later received criminal charges for which they were transferred to the adult court system, ("Tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duvall, Julie
Other Authors: Morris, Richard J.
Language:EN
Published: The University of Arizona. 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195701
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-195701
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-1957012015-10-23T04:43:09Z Disability and Type/Level of Offense Committed by Juveniles Transferred versus Not Transferred to the Adult Court System Duvall, Julie Morris, Richard J. Morris, Richard J. Mishra, Shitala P. Aleamoni, Lawrence M. juvenile corrections disability Transfer to adult court The purpose of this study was to compare two groups of males in Arizona Department of Corrections (ADJC) custody with regard to three factors. The first group consisted of youth sentenced to ADJC who later received criminal charges for which they were transferred to the adult court system, ("Transferred" group), and the second group involved youth sentenced to ADJC who did not receive any additional criminal charges for which they were transferred, ("Non-Transferred" group). The variables examined were: youth with versus without a special education disability diagnosis, most serious level of offense for which the youth was imprisoned, and ethnicity. Due to the lack of prior research in this area, only null hypotheses were formulated. The first hypothesis was there would be no significant differences between the two groups on the observed versus expected frequencies of each of the variables studied. The second hypothesis was that there would be no significant association between the two groups with regard to their disability status on each of the variables.The results showed that regarding disability status, the null hypothesis was not rejected. The frequency of disabilities represented in both groups and the proportion of youth eligible to receive special education services was not different. Regarding the seriousness of offense level, the null hypothesis that both groups were identical was not rejected; indicating that the Transferred group was not significantly different from the Non-Transferred group in frequency of most serious offense level. In terms of disability status, and level of offense committed, the null hypothesis was also not rejected. Finally, regarding ethnic representation, no significant associations were found for the groups.The groups studied showed a larger percentage of youth receiving special education services, in comparison to the percentage of youth receiving special education services within the whole educational system. The groups also had a larger percentage of minorities compared to the latest Arizona census information on ethnic backgrounds of children under age 18. The results highlight the similarities between the Transferred and Non-Transferred groups and discuss the implications of the findings, future research directions, and the study's limitations. 2010 text Electronic Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195701 659754982 11027 EN Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic juvenile corrections
disability
Transfer to adult court
spellingShingle juvenile corrections
disability
Transfer to adult court
Duvall, Julie
Disability and Type/Level of Offense Committed by Juveniles Transferred versus Not Transferred to the Adult Court System
description The purpose of this study was to compare two groups of males in Arizona Department of Corrections (ADJC) custody with regard to three factors. The first group consisted of youth sentenced to ADJC who later received criminal charges for which they were transferred to the adult court system, ("Transferred" group), and the second group involved youth sentenced to ADJC who did not receive any additional criminal charges for which they were transferred, ("Non-Transferred" group). The variables examined were: youth with versus without a special education disability diagnosis, most serious level of offense for which the youth was imprisoned, and ethnicity. Due to the lack of prior research in this area, only null hypotheses were formulated. The first hypothesis was there would be no significant differences between the two groups on the observed versus expected frequencies of each of the variables studied. The second hypothesis was that there would be no significant association between the two groups with regard to their disability status on each of the variables.The results showed that regarding disability status, the null hypothesis was not rejected. The frequency of disabilities represented in both groups and the proportion of youth eligible to receive special education services was not different. Regarding the seriousness of offense level, the null hypothesis that both groups were identical was not rejected; indicating that the Transferred group was not significantly different from the Non-Transferred group in frequency of most serious offense level. In terms of disability status, and level of offense committed, the null hypothesis was also not rejected. Finally, regarding ethnic representation, no significant associations were found for the groups.The groups studied showed a larger percentage of youth receiving special education services, in comparison to the percentage of youth receiving special education services within the whole educational system. The groups also had a larger percentage of minorities compared to the latest Arizona census information on ethnic backgrounds of children under age 18. The results highlight the similarities between the Transferred and Non-Transferred groups and discuss the implications of the findings, future research directions, and the study's limitations.
author2 Morris, Richard J.
author_facet Morris, Richard J.
Duvall, Julie
author Duvall, Julie
author_sort Duvall, Julie
title Disability and Type/Level of Offense Committed by Juveniles Transferred versus Not Transferred to the Adult Court System
title_short Disability and Type/Level of Offense Committed by Juveniles Transferred versus Not Transferred to the Adult Court System
title_full Disability and Type/Level of Offense Committed by Juveniles Transferred versus Not Transferred to the Adult Court System
title_fullStr Disability and Type/Level of Offense Committed by Juveniles Transferred versus Not Transferred to the Adult Court System
title_full_unstemmed Disability and Type/Level of Offense Committed by Juveniles Transferred versus Not Transferred to the Adult Court System
title_sort disability and type/level of offense committed by juveniles transferred versus not transferred to the adult court system
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/195701
work_keys_str_mv AT duvalljulie disabilityandtypelevelofoffensecommittedbyjuvenilestransferredversusnottransferredtotheadultcourtsystem
_version_ 1718099647444025344