Situational and Trait Influences on Dynamic Justice

As the past twenty years of justice research have demonstrated, perceiving the workplace as fair is associated with higher levels of organizational commitment, job satisfaction, work-related effort, acceptance of work-related policies and procedures, and decreased absenteeism. However, although not...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stein, Jordan
Other Authors: Cropanzano, Russell
Language:en
Published: The University of Arizona. 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194844
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-194844
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-1948442015-10-23T04:41:34Z Situational and Trait Influences on Dynamic Justice Stein, Jordan Cropanzano, Russell Cropanzano, Russell Goldman, Barry M Gilliland, Stephen event-contingent experience sampling fairness justice organizational behavior work As the past twenty years of justice research have demonstrated, perceiving the workplace as fair is associated with higher levels of organizational commitment, job satisfaction, work-related effort, acceptance of work-related policies and procedures, and decreased absenteeism. However, although not always explicitly stated in theories of fairness, there has been a tacit understanding that justice perceptions are not static, but influenced by a variety of factors. In short, extant justice theories assume there are underlying dynamic elements within the construct, but the measures and previous research examining justice has assessed it as if it were a stable and static perception. The purpose of this research, therefore, was to take the first step to explore and describe the frequency and intensity of injustice perceptions at work and how individuals' affective states and traits influence these perceptions. A snow-ball sample of working individuals from across the United States provided ESM data by responding to palmtop computers at randomly scheduled intervals several times a day for 3 work weeks. Additionally, participants provided event-contingent injustice data when they perceived unfair events during their workday. The results of this examination, as well as the use of experience sampling for the study of dynamic workplace injustice, are discussed. 2010 text Electronic Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194844 752261026 11172 en Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic event-contingent
experience sampling
fairness
justice
organizational behavior
work
spellingShingle event-contingent
experience sampling
fairness
justice
organizational behavior
work
Stein, Jordan
Situational and Trait Influences on Dynamic Justice
description As the past twenty years of justice research have demonstrated, perceiving the workplace as fair is associated with higher levels of organizational commitment, job satisfaction, work-related effort, acceptance of work-related policies and procedures, and decreased absenteeism. However, although not always explicitly stated in theories of fairness, there has been a tacit understanding that justice perceptions are not static, but influenced by a variety of factors. In short, extant justice theories assume there are underlying dynamic elements within the construct, but the measures and previous research examining justice has assessed it as if it were a stable and static perception. The purpose of this research, therefore, was to take the first step to explore and describe the frequency and intensity of injustice perceptions at work and how individuals' affective states and traits influence these perceptions. A snow-ball sample of working individuals from across the United States provided ESM data by responding to palmtop computers at randomly scheduled intervals several times a day for 3 work weeks. Additionally, participants provided event-contingent injustice data when they perceived unfair events during their workday. The results of this examination, as well as the use of experience sampling for the study of dynamic workplace injustice, are discussed.
author2 Cropanzano, Russell
author_facet Cropanzano, Russell
Stein, Jordan
author Stein, Jordan
author_sort Stein, Jordan
title Situational and Trait Influences on Dynamic Justice
title_short Situational and Trait Influences on Dynamic Justice
title_full Situational and Trait Influences on Dynamic Justice
title_fullStr Situational and Trait Influences on Dynamic Justice
title_full_unstemmed Situational and Trait Influences on Dynamic Justice
title_sort situational and trait influences on dynamic justice
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194844
work_keys_str_mv AT steinjordan situationalandtraitinfluencesondynamicjustice
_version_ 1718099380949483520