Parents' Vicarious Shame and Guilt Responses to Children's Wrong-doings

Contemporary theory on moral emotion distinguishes shame and guilt, and differentiates the cognitive antecedents and motivational consequences of each (Tangney & Fischer, 1995). Recent theory and research has expanded these ideas to recognize that others' negative actions can cause shame a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scarnier, Marchelle
Other Authors: Schmader, Toni
Language:EN
Published: The University of Arizona. 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194653
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-194653
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-1946532015-10-23T04:41:25Z Parents' Vicarious Shame and Guilt Responses to Children's Wrong-doings Scarnier, Marchelle Schmader, Toni Schmader, Toni Greenberg, Jeff Fryberg, Stephanie Psychology Contemporary theory on moral emotion distinguishes shame and guilt, and differentiates the cognitive antecedents and motivational consequences of each (Tangney & Fischer, 1995). Recent theory and research has expanded these ideas to recognize that others' negative actions can cause shame and guilt vicariously (Lickel et al, 2005). Applying these models, the present research tested factors that differentiate a parent's shame or guilt reaction to the misdeeds of their children and the relationship between emotion and discipline strategies. In Study 1, parents recalled their child's worst transgression and rated its effect on their thoughts and feelings. Results revealed that publicity appraisals uniquely predicted shame, as mediated by image threat. In contrast, perceptions that one has less control than they feel parents should have over their children (interdependence discrepancy) uniquely predicted guilt. In Study 2, mothers rated what they would think, feel, and do if their child hit another child in front of a neighbor who was described as supportive, neutral, or judgmental. We also primed a sense of control deficiency using an ease of recall paradigm. Results revealed that a critical observer elevated ratings of shame compared to control; although a supportive observer did not act as a buffer from shame as expected. Guilt was higher for mothers with chronically high ratings of control deficiency only when they were also primed to feel they lack the ability to influence their children, and not when they were primed with a sense of control. Across both studies, guilt predicted more adaptive discipline patterns, whereas shame predicted less adaptive discipline. Implications for the role of self-conscious emotion in family dynamics are discussed. 2007 text Electronic Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194653 659748364 2445 EN Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language EN
sources NDLTD
topic Psychology
spellingShingle Psychology
Scarnier, Marchelle
Parents' Vicarious Shame and Guilt Responses to Children's Wrong-doings
description Contemporary theory on moral emotion distinguishes shame and guilt, and differentiates the cognitive antecedents and motivational consequences of each (Tangney & Fischer, 1995). Recent theory and research has expanded these ideas to recognize that others' negative actions can cause shame and guilt vicariously (Lickel et al, 2005). Applying these models, the present research tested factors that differentiate a parent's shame or guilt reaction to the misdeeds of their children and the relationship between emotion and discipline strategies. In Study 1, parents recalled their child's worst transgression and rated its effect on their thoughts and feelings. Results revealed that publicity appraisals uniquely predicted shame, as mediated by image threat. In contrast, perceptions that one has less control than they feel parents should have over their children (interdependence discrepancy) uniquely predicted guilt. In Study 2, mothers rated what they would think, feel, and do if their child hit another child in front of a neighbor who was described as supportive, neutral, or judgmental. We also primed a sense of control deficiency using an ease of recall paradigm. Results revealed that a critical observer elevated ratings of shame compared to control; although a supportive observer did not act as a buffer from shame as expected. Guilt was higher for mothers with chronically high ratings of control deficiency only when they were also primed to feel they lack the ability to influence their children, and not when they were primed with a sense of control. Across both studies, guilt predicted more adaptive discipline patterns, whereas shame predicted less adaptive discipline. Implications for the role of self-conscious emotion in family dynamics are discussed.
author2 Schmader, Toni
author_facet Schmader, Toni
Scarnier, Marchelle
author Scarnier, Marchelle
author_sort Scarnier, Marchelle
title Parents' Vicarious Shame and Guilt Responses to Children's Wrong-doings
title_short Parents' Vicarious Shame and Guilt Responses to Children's Wrong-doings
title_full Parents' Vicarious Shame and Guilt Responses to Children's Wrong-doings
title_fullStr Parents' Vicarious Shame and Guilt Responses to Children's Wrong-doings
title_full_unstemmed Parents' Vicarious Shame and Guilt Responses to Children's Wrong-doings
title_sort parents' vicarious shame and guilt responses to children's wrong-doings
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 2007
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194653
work_keys_str_mv AT scarniermarchelle parentsvicariousshameandguiltresponsestochildrenswrongdoings
_version_ 1718099320803164160