Combat in the courtroom: The battle of the experts, reputation bias, and perceived credibility.
This analogue, jury-simulation study consisted of two parts and examined some of the assumptions underlying the "battle of the expert witnesses" and expert bias. Part I assessed the perceptions and influences of mental health and medical non-mental health expert witnesses, as represented b...
Main Author: | Belon, Howard Porter. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Greenberg, Jeff |
Language: | en |
Published: |
The University of Arizona.
1991
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/185394 |
Similar Items
-
The rational thinking of expert opinion and communicating in courtroom
by: Bing Li, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Aspirations of Objectivity: Systemic Illusions of Justice in the Biased Courtroom
by: Roderique, Meagan B.
Published: (2018) -
Trust in courtroom participants: A question of bias in prospective jurors
by: Adrian, Robin Leslie
Published: (1994) -
Reputation, credibility and monetary policy effectiveness
by: Gabriel Caldas Montes
Published: (2009-09-01) -
How does expert endorsement affect consumer’s perceived credibility?
by: Eyob, Helen
Published: (2018)