A COMPARISON OF ART PROGRAM EVALUATION RATINGS BY SELF AND VISITING TEAMS IN SELECTED NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION HIGH SCHOOLS (ARIZONA).

The investigation was concerned with 31 Arizona high schools which were members of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools and which had employed the "Evaluative Criteria," 5th Edition to evaluate themselves and which also had a visiting North Central Team evaluation. The stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shahrani, Enayat-Ullah
Other Authors: Barnes, William Donald
Language:en
Published: The University of Arizona. 1986
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/183985
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-183985
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-1839852015-10-23T04:28:52Z A COMPARISON OF ART PROGRAM EVALUATION RATINGS BY SELF AND VISITING TEAMS IN SELECTED NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION HIGH SCHOOLS (ARIZONA). Shahrani, Enayat-Ullah Barnes, William Donald Leigh, Howard Allen, Paul M. The investigation was concerned with 31 Arizona high schools which were members of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools and which had employed the "Evaluative Criteria," 5th Edition to evaluate themselves and which also had a visiting North Central Team evaluation. The study focused on the art section of each school's evaluation. It sought to ascertain differences in ratings between the schools' self-evaluation and the ratings of the visiting North Central Teams on the 31 evaluation items of the Art Section. A theoretical framework of six categories was constructed. This included: Fundamentals, Self-Actualization, Evaluation, Progress, Support, and General Evaluation. Related literature was reviewed for each category to provide a backdrop of concepts with which to consider the collected data. Each of the 31 evaluation items was subsumed under one or another of these categories for systematic study and reporting. The data were analyzed by use of the product-moment correlation coefficient, and the obtained indices of relationship were examined for their significance at the .05 alpha level. A second analysis involving the statistics was applied to the two sets of obtained ratings across the six categories. The factors of school size, i.e., small and large schools, and geographic location, i.e., rural and urban, were also considered statistically. It was found that there was a significant positive set of relationships across the six categories of the theoretical framework between how the schools rated themselves in the art area and how the visiting North Central teams rated the schools in the art area. School size appeared to be a factor in only two of the six categories, i.e., Self-Evaluation and General Evaluation, while geographic location appeared to be a factor in the three categories of Self-Actualization, Evaluation, and Support. 1986 text Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) http://hdl.handle.net/10150/183985 8708567 en Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. The University of Arizona.
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
description The investigation was concerned with 31 Arizona high schools which were members of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools and which had employed the "Evaluative Criteria," 5th Edition to evaluate themselves and which also had a visiting North Central Team evaluation. The study focused on the art section of each school's evaluation. It sought to ascertain differences in ratings between the schools' self-evaluation and the ratings of the visiting North Central Teams on the 31 evaluation items of the Art Section. A theoretical framework of six categories was constructed. This included: Fundamentals, Self-Actualization, Evaluation, Progress, Support, and General Evaluation. Related literature was reviewed for each category to provide a backdrop of concepts with which to consider the collected data. Each of the 31 evaluation items was subsumed under one or another of these categories for systematic study and reporting. The data were analyzed by use of the product-moment correlation coefficient, and the obtained indices of relationship were examined for their significance at the .05 alpha level. A second analysis involving the statistics was applied to the two sets of obtained ratings across the six categories. The factors of school size, i.e., small and large schools, and geographic location, i.e., rural and urban, were also considered statistically. It was found that there was a significant positive set of relationships across the six categories of the theoretical framework between how the schools rated themselves in the art area and how the visiting North Central teams rated the schools in the art area. School size appeared to be a factor in only two of the six categories, i.e., Self-Evaluation and General Evaluation, while geographic location appeared to be a factor in the three categories of Self-Actualization, Evaluation, and Support.
author2 Barnes, William Donald
author_facet Barnes, William Donald
Shahrani, Enayat-Ullah
author Shahrani, Enayat-Ullah
spellingShingle Shahrani, Enayat-Ullah
A COMPARISON OF ART PROGRAM EVALUATION RATINGS BY SELF AND VISITING TEAMS IN SELECTED NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION HIGH SCHOOLS (ARIZONA).
author_sort Shahrani, Enayat-Ullah
title A COMPARISON OF ART PROGRAM EVALUATION RATINGS BY SELF AND VISITING TEAMS IN SELECTED NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION HIGH SCHOOLS (ARIZONA).
title_short A COMPARISON OF ART PROGRAM EVALUATION RATINGS BY SELF AND VISITING TEAMS IN SELECTED NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION HIGH SCHOOLS (ARIZONA).
title_full A COMPARISON OF ART PROGRAM EVALUATION RATINGS BY SELF AND VISITING TEAMS IN SELECTED NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION HIGH SCHOOLS (ARIZONA).
title_fullStr A COMPARISON OF ART PROGRAM EVALUATION RATINGS BY SELF AND VISITING TEAMS IN SELECTED NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION HIGH SCHOOLS (ARIZONA).
title_full_unstemmed A COMPARISON OF ART PROGRAM EVALUATION RATINGS BY SELF AND VISITING TEAMS IN SELECTED NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION HIGH SCHOOLS (ARIZONA).
title_sort comparison of art program evaluation ratings by self and visiting teams in selected north central association high schools (arizona).
publisher The University of Arizona.
publishDate 1986
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/183985
work_keys_str_mv AT shahranienayatullah acomparisonofartprogramevaluationratingsbyselfandvisitingteamsinselectednorthcentralassociationhighschoolsarizona
AT shahranienayatullah comparisonofartprogramevaluationratingsbyselfandvisitingteamsinselectednorthcentralassociationhighschoolsarizona
_version_ 1718097236573814784