AN EMPIRICAL COMPARISON OF SELECTED ALTERNATIVES TO THE KUDER AND RICHARDSON FORMULA 20 (RELIABILITY, HOMOGENEITY, SIMULATION).
Several alternatives to the Kuder and Richardson formula number 20 (KR20) were compared for accuracy using simulated and actual data sets. Coefficients by Loevinger (1948), Horst (1954), Raju (1982), and Cliff (1984) as well as the Kuder and Richardson formulae numbers 8 and 14 were examined. These...
Main Author: | LUITEN, JOHN WILLIAM. |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Sabers, Darrell |
Language: | en |
Published: |
The University of Arizona.
1986
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10150/183963 |
Similar Items
-
Reliability of a viva assessment of clinical reasoning in an Australian pre-professional osteopathy program assessed using generalizability theory
by: Brett Vaughan, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Comparison of different equating methods and an application to link testlet-based tests.
Published: (2010) -
The Joint effects of simultaneiously violating the homogeneity of regression and homogeneity of variance assumptions on the F-test in the analysis of covariance - a Monte Carlo simulation.
by: Scanlon, R. Lorcan
Published: (1972) -
Reliability and validation of the Positive Aspects of Caregiving scale among Japanese caregivers of people with dementia
by: Hidetoshi Furukawa, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Wellbeing in New Zealand: a reliability and validity study of the New Zealand Sovereign Wellbeing Index
by: Reid, Amanda Kate
Published: (2015)