Date Collections in New World Archaeology

This paper has two goals. One is to examine how archaeologists have used large collections of archaeologically derived "dates" to illustrate general principles about how these collections should be interpreted. The other is to review the collection of archaeomagnetic dates now on record fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andresen, John M.
Language:en_US
Published: University of Arizona, Department of Anthropology 1982
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10150/112173
id ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-112173
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-arizona.edu-oai-arizona.openrepository.com-10150-1121732015-10-23T04:24:53Z Date Collections in New World Archaeology Andresen, John M. This paper has two goals. One is to examine how archaeologists have used large collections of archaeologically derived "dates" to illustrate general principles about how these collections should be interpreted. The other is to review the collection of archaeomagnetic dates now on record from Hohokam archaeological sites in southern Arizona, in light of the conclusions provided by the first part of the paper It seems that there is a significant pattern in the series of Hohokam hearth dates from Classic Period sites. This pattern may be the result of systematic changes in the prehistoric behavior underlying these dates, or it may be the result of systematic laboratory problems, In either case, attention is drawn to the uneven distribution of Hohokam hearth dates in order to pose research questions. The bar graph treatment of dates used here has precedent in similar treatment by archaeologists of other date collections, Some examples are reviewed below to provide background to this series analysis of an archaeomagnetic date collection. 1982 Article 0275-3553 http://hdl.handle.net/10150/112173 Atlatl en_US University of Arizona, Department of Anthropology
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
description This paper has two goals. One is to examine how archaeologists have used large collections of archaeologically derived "dates" to illustrate general principles about how these collections should be interpreted. The other is to review the collection of archaeomagnetic dates now on record from Hohokam archaeological sites in southern Arizona, in light of the conclusions provided by the first part of the paper It seems that there is a significant pattern in the series of Hohokam hearth dates from Classic Period sites. This pattern may be the result of systematic changes in the prehistoric behavior underlying these dates, or it may be the result of systematic laboratory problems, In either case, attention is drawn to the uneven distribution of Hohokam hearth dates in order to pose research questions. The bar graph treatment of dates used here has precedent in similar treatment by archaeologists of other date collections, Some examples are reviewed below to provide background to this series analysis of an archaeomagnetic date collection.
author Andresen, John M.
spellingShingle Andresen, John M.
Date Collections in New World Archaeology
author_facet Andresen, John M.
author_sort Andresen, John M.
title Date Collections in New World Archaeology
title_short Date Collections in New World Archaeology
title_full Date Collections in New World Archaeology
title_fullStr Date Collections in New World Archaeology
title_full_unstemmed Date Collections in New World Archaeology
title_sort date collections in new world archaeology
publisher University of Arizona, Department of Anthropology
publishDate 1982
url http://hdl.handle.net/10150/112173
work_keys_str_mv AT andresenjohnm datecollectionsinnewworldarchaeology
_version_ 1718096535377412096