Characteristics of Behavior Rating Scales: Revisited

This study was a replication of a study by Hosp et al. (2003), which looked at items on behavior rating scales to determine if they can be used to plan and monitor positive behavior interventions. For this study, ten forms of commonly used behavior rating scales were selected, and the so what and de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cox, Ellen
Format: Others
Published: TopSCHOLAR® 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/3103
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4097&context=theses
id ndltd-WKU-oai-digitalcommons.wku.edu-theses-4097
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-WKU-oai-digitalcommons.wku.edu-theses-40972019-10-15T04:50:38Z Characteristics of Behavior Rating Scales: Revisited Cox, Ellen This study was a replication of a study by Hosp et al. (2003), which looked at items on behavior rating scales to determine if they can be used to plan and monitor positive behavior interventions. For this study, ten forms of commonly used behavior rating scales were selected, and the so what and dead man tests were applied on each scale. Each item on the scale was placed into one of four categories: positive action, negative action, lack of positive action, and lack of negative action. Then, these categories were used to rate each scale to determine which subscales survived, or were deemed useful for measuring increases in positive behavior. Eight of the ten scales were found to contain a majority of negative action items and some lack of action items, neither of which are useful in measuring positive behaviors. Only two scales, the parent and teacher versions of the BERS-2, were found to contain all positive action items, and therefore were the only scales to fully survive the dead man test. The results of this study show that the majority of commonly used behavior rating scales today still do not contain primarily positive action items, and therefore have not majorly improved in the last fifteen years, although all of the behavior rating scales contained subscales that could have potential to plan and monitor positive behavior interventions. 2019-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/3103 https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4097&context=theses Masters Theses & Specialist Projects TopSCHOLAR® positive behavior interventions planning monitoring Child Psychology Clinical Psychology Psychology School Psychology
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic positive behavior interventions
planning
monitoring
Child Psychology
Clinical Psychology
Psychology
School Psychology
spellingShingle positive behavior interventions
planning
monitoring
Child Psychology
Clinical Psychology
Psychology
School Psychology
Cox, Ellen
Characteristics of Behavior Rating Scales: Revisited
description This study was a replication of a study by Hosp et al. (2003), which looked at items on behavior rating scales to determine if they can be used to plan and monitor positive behavior interventions. For this study, ten forms of commonly used behavior rating scales were selected, and the so what and dead man tests were applied on each scale. Each item on the scale was placed into one of four categories: positive action, negative action, lack of positive action, and lack of negative action. Then, these categories were used to rate each scale to determine which subscales survived, or were deemed useful for measuring increases in positive behavior. Eight of the ten scales were found to contain a majority of negative action items and some lack of action items, neither of which are useful in measuring positive behaviors. Only two scales, the parent and teacher versions of the BERS-2, were found to contain all positive action items, and therefore were the only scales to fully survive the dead man test. The results of this study show that the majority of commonly used behavior rating scales today still do not contain primarily positive action items, and therefore have not majorly improved in the last fifteen years, although all of the behavior rating scales contained subscales that could have potential to plan and monitor positive behavior interventions.
author Cox, Ellen
author_facet Cox, Ellen
author_sort Cox, Ellen
title Characteristics of Behavior Rating Scales: Revisited
title_short Characteristics of Behavior Rating Scales: Revisited
title_full Characteristics of Behavior Rating Scales: Revisited
title_fullStr Characteristics of Behavior Rating Scales: Revisited
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of Behavior Rating Scales: Revisited
title_sort characteristics of behavior rating scales: revisited
publisher TopSCHOLAR®
publishDate 2019
url https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/3103
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4097&context=theses
work_keys_str_mv AT coxellen characteristicsofbehaviorratingscalesrevisited
_version_ 1719268792940363776