Are within-subjects designs transparent?

In the field of judgment and decision making (JDM), it is sometimes argued that within-subjects designs should be avoided because they are transparent. This claim ignores that between- and within-subjects designs are frequently not interchangeable. The transparency of within-subjects replications of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lambdin, Charles Garett
Other Authors: Shaffer, Victoria A.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Wichita State University 2010
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2368
id ndltd-WICHITA-oai-soar.wichita.edu-10057-2368
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-WICHITA-oai-soar.wichita.edu-10057-23682013-04-19T21:00:24ZAre within-subjects designs transparent?Lambdin, Charles GarettIn the field of judgment and decision making (JDM), it is sometimes argued that within-subjects designs should be avoided because they are transparent. This claim ignores that between- and within-subjects designs are frequently not interchangeable. The transparency of within-subjects replications of four between-subjects JDM experiments was empirically tested. None of the replications were found to be transparent, and further, transparency did not in any way affect the success or failure of the replications. It was also found that members of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making were not able to predict how transparent tasks would be when presented within subjects, suggesting that researchers have no special insight into what will or will not prove transparent to participants.Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dept. of PsychologyWichita State UniversityShaffer, Victoria A.2010-05-03T18:38:28Z2010-05-03T18:38:28Z2009-05Dissertationx, 168 p.2289317 bytesapplication/pdfd09008http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2368en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description In the field of judgment and decision making (JDM), it is sometimes argued that within-subjects designs should be avoided because they are transparent. This claim ignores that between- and within-subjects designs are frequently not interchangeable. The transparency of within-subjects replications of four between-subjects JDM experiments was empirically tested. None of the replications were found to be transparent, and further, transparency did not in any way affect the success or failure of the replications. It was also found that members of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making were not able to predict how transparent tasks would be when presented within subjects, suggesting that researchers have no special insight into what will or will not prove transparent to participants. === Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dept. of Psychology
author2 Shaffer, Victoria A.
author_facet Shaffer, Victoria A.
Lambdin, Charles Garett
author Lambdin, Charles Garett
spellingShingle Lambdin, Charles Garett
Are within-subjects designs transparent?
author_sort Lambdin, Charles Garett
title Are within-subjects designs transparent?
title_short Are within-subjects designs transparent?
title_full Are within-subjects designs transparent?
title_fullStr Are within-subjects designs transparent?
title_full_unstemmed Are within-subjects designs transparent?
title_sort are within-subjects designs transparent?
publisher Wichita State University
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2368
work_keys_str_mv AT lambdincharlesgarett arewithinsubjectsdesignstransparent
_version_ 1716583050700128256