Are within-subjects designs transparent?
In the field of judgment and decision making (JDM), it is sometimes argued that within-subjects designs should be avoided because they are transparent. This claim ignores that between- and within-subjects designs are frequently not interchangeable. The transparency of within-subjects replications of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Wichita State University
2010
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2368 |
id |
ndltd-WICHITA-oai-soar.wichita.edu-10057-2368 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-WICHITA-oai-soar.wichita.edu-10057-23682013-04-19T21:00:24ZAre within-subjects designs transparent?Lambdin, Charles GarettIn the field of judgment and decision making (JDM), it is sometimes argued that within-subjects designs should be avoided because they are transparent. This claim ignores that between- and within-subjects designs are frequently not interchangeable. The transparency of within-subjects replications of four between-subjects JDM experiments was empirically tested. None of the replications were found to be transparent, and further, transparency did not in any way affect the success or failure of the replications. It was also found that members of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making were not able to predict how transparent tasks would be when presented within subjects, suggesting that researchers have no special insight into what will or will not prove transparent to participants.Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dept. of PsychologyWichita State UniversityShaffer, Victoria A.2010-05-03T18:38:28Z2010-05-03T18:38:28Z2009-05Dissertationx, 168 p.2289317 bytesapplication/pdfd09008http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2368en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
In the field of judgment and decision making (JDM), it is sometimes argued that within-subjects designs should be avoided because they are transparent. This claim ignores that between- and within-subjects designs are frequently not interchangeable. The transparency of within-subjects replications of four between-subjects JDM experiments was empirically tested. None of the replications were found to be transparent, and further, transparency did not in any way affect the success or failure of the replications. It was also found that members of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making were not able to predict how transparent tasks would be when presented within subjects, suggesting that researchers have no special insight into what will or will not prove transparent to participants. === Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dept. of Psychology |
author2 |
Shaffer, Victoria A. |
author_facet |
Shaffer, Victoria A. Lambdin, Charles Garett |
author |
Lambdin, Charles Garett |
spellingShingle |
Lambdin, Charles Garett Are within-subjects designs transparent? |
author_sort |
Lambdin, Charles Garett |
title |
Are within-subjects designs transparent? |
title_short |
Are within-subjects designs transparent? |
title_full |
Are within-subjects designs transparent? |
title_fullStr |
Are within-subjects designs transparent? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are within-subjects designs transparent? |
title_sort |
are within-subjects designs transparent? |
publisher |
Wichita State University |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2368 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lambdincharlesgarett arewithinsubjectsdesignstransparent |
_version_ |
1716583050700128256 |