On the maxillomalar suture and the assessment of group affiliation

The following research aims to determine whether or not the maxillomalar suture can determine group affiliation via quantitative assessment. Until now the standard method of determination involved a visual assessment of the shape of the suture, which can be biased. Quantification of this method woul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Holt, Julie Michelle
Other Authors: Moore-Jansen, Peer H.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Wichita State University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2101
id ndltd-WICHITA-oai-soar.wichita.edu-10057-2101
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-WICHITA-oai-soar.wichita.edu-10057-21012013-04-19T20:59:57ZOn the maxillomalar suture and the assessment of group affiliationHolt, Julie MichelleElectronic dissertationsThe following research aims to determine whether or not the maxillomalar suture can determine group affiliation via quantitative assessment. Until now the standard method of determination involved a visual assessment of the shape of the suture, which can be biased. Quantification of this method would allow for more accuracy in the determination and greater repeatability of results. Twenty-three measurements were taken on two hundred and nine Black and White males at the Todd Collection in Cleveland and fifty Native American individuals of unknown age and sex from the Libben Site Collection housed at Kent State University. Three measurements were developed to measure the bimaxillary breaths from different points directly on the maxillomalar suture and three qualitative classifications were used to assess the visual shape. The three bimaxillary suture measurements appear to be the best indicators for group affiliation compared to the other metric measurements. Native Americans had the highest mean for those measurements, indicating the widest facial crania, while Blacks had the lowest means. The bimaxillary breadth measures were all statistically significant at the .05 alpha level. There was slight difference between groups in the maxillomalar suture length noted and this difference was statistically significant on the right side only. The visual qualitative assessment showed recognizable variation in the White and Black samples and very little in the Native American sample.Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Science, Dept. of AnthropologyIncludes bibliographic references (leaves 53-57)Wichita State UniversityMoore-Jansen, Peer H.2009-08-22T02:27:57Z2009-08-22T02:27:57Z20082008-12Thesisxi, 66 leaves, ill.7530547 bytesapplication/pdft08063http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2101en_USCopyright 2008 by Julie Michelle Holt. All Rights Reserved
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Electronic dissertations
spellingShingle Electronic dissertations
Holt, Julie Michelle
On the maxillomalar suture and the assessment of group affiliation
description The following research aims to determine whether or not the maxillomalar suture can determine group affiliation via quantitative assessment. Until now the standard method of determination involved a visual assessment of the shape of the suture, which can be biased. Quantification of this method would allow for more accuracy in the determination and greater repeatability of results. Twenty-three measurements were taken on two hundred and nine Black and White males at the Todd Collection in Cleveland and fifty Native American individuals of unknown age and sex from the Libben Site Collection housed at Kent State University. Three measurements were developed to measure the bimaxillary breaths from different points directly on the maxillomalar suture and three qualitative classifications were used to assess the visual shape. The three bimaxillary suture measurements appear to be the best indicators for group affiliation compared to the other metric measurements. Native Americans had the highest mean for those measurements, indicating the widest facial crania, while Blacks had the lowest means. The bimaxillary breadth measures were all statistically significant at the .05 alpha level. There was slight difference between groups in the maxillomalar suture length noted and this difference was statistically significant on the right side only. The visual qualitative assessment showed recognizable variation in the White and Black samples and very little in the Native American sample. === Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Science, Dept. of Anthropology === Includes bibliographic references (leaves 53-57)
author2 Moore-Jansen, Peer H.
author_facet Moore-Jansen, Peer H.
Holt, Julie Michelle
author Holt, Julie Michelle
author_sort Holt, Julie Michelle
title On the maxillomalar suture and the assessment of group affiliation
title_short On the maxillomalar suture and the assessment of group affiliation
title_full On the maxillomalar suture and the assessment of group affiliation
title_fullStr On the maxillomalar suture and the assessment of group affiliation
title_full_unstemmed On the maxillomalar suture and the assessment of group affiliation
title_sort on the maxillomalar suture and the assessment of group affiliation
publisher Wichita State University
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2101
work_keys_str_mv AT holtjuliemichelle onthemaxillomalarsutureandtheassessmentofgroupaffiliation
_version_ 1716583048242266112