Examining the psychometric properties of self-report measures of bullying: Reliability of the peer relations questionnaire

Self-report measures of bullying have recently been under scrutiny due to limited evidence of their psychometric properties. Nevertheless, they continue to be the main tool for estimating prevalence of bullying behavior in schools, as well as evaluating the effectiveness of bullying prevention progr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hulsey, Cassandra
Other Authors: Romig, Chuck
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Wichita State University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2050
id ndltd-WICHITA-oai-soar.wichita.edu-10057-2050
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-WICHITA-oai-soar.wichita.edu-10057-20502014-04-30T04:59:58ZExamining the psychometric properties of self-report measures of bullying: Reliability of the peer relations questionnaireHulsey, CassandraElectronic dissertationsSelf-report measures of bullying have recently been under scrutiny due to limited evidence of their psychometric properties. Nevertheless, they continue to be the main tool for estimating prevalence of bullying behavior in schools, as well as evaluating the effectiveness of bullying prevention programs. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Peer Relations Questionnaire, a widely used self-report measure of bullying. In an attempt to evaluate the internal consistency of the Victimization scale and test-retest reliability of the (PRQ) as a whole and across grade levels, it was administered twice to third and fourth, sixth and seventh, and tenth and eleventh graders with an eight week interval. Results showed moderate reliability with middle school (69.4% correspondence) and high school (74.8% correspondence) students and low reliability for elementary students (62.3% correspondence). Across all age groups, the PRQ had a test-retest reliability of 69% correspondence. Internal consistencies for the Victimization scale were high across all grade levels. These results suggest the PRQ is most effective when used with older students, although its reliability estimates have room for improvement in all groups. Future research is needed to evaluate other commonly used instruments in the field to support their use in the collection of bullying data.Thesis (M.Ed.) - Wichita State University, College of Education, Dept. of Counseling, Educational, and School PsychologyWichita State UniversityRomig, Chuck2009-06-29T12:52:49Z2009-06-29T12:52:49Z20082008-05Thesisvii, 38 leaves, ill.192306 bytesapplication/pdft08022http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2050en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Electronic dissertations
spellingShingle Electronic dissertations
Hulsey, Cassandra
Examining the psychometric properties of self-report measures of bullying: Reliability of the peer relations questionnaire
description Self-report measures of bullying have recently been under scrutiny due to limited evidence of their psychometric properties. Nevertheless, they continue to be the main tool for estimating prevalence of bullying behavior in schools, as well as evaluating the effectiveness of bullying prevention programs. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Peer Relations Questionnaire, a widely used self-report measure of bullying. In an attempt to evaluate the internal consistency of the Victimization scale and test-retest reliability of the (PRQ) as a whole and across grade levels, it was administered twice to third and fourth, sixth and seventh, and tenth and eleventh graders with an eight week interval. Results showed moderate reliability with middle school (69.4% correspondence) and high school (74.8% correspondence) students and low reliability for elementary students (62.3% correspondence). Across all age groups, the PRQ had a test-retest reliability of 69% correspondence. Internal consistencies for the Victimization scale were high across all grade levels. These results suggest the PRQ is most effective when used with older students, although its reliability estimates have room for improvement in all groups. Future research is needed to evaluate other commonly used instruments in the field to support their use in the collection of bullying data. === Thesis (M.Ed.) - Wichita State University, College of Education, Dept. of Counseling, Educational, and School Psychology
author2 Romig, Chuck
author_facet Romig, Chuck
Hulsey, Cassandra
author Hulsey, Cassandra
author_sort Hulsey, Cassandra
title Examining the psychometric properties of self-report measures of bullying: Reliability of the peer relations questionnaire
title_short Examining the psychometric properties of self-report measures of bullying: Reliability of the peer relations questionnaire
title_full Examining the psychometric properties of self-report measures of bullying: Reliability of the peer relations questionnaire
title_fullStr Examining the psychometric properties of self-report measures of bullying: Reliability of the peer relations questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Examining the psychometric properties of self-report measures of bullying: Reliability of the peer relations questionnaire
title_sort examining the psychometric properties of self-report measures of bullying: reliability of the peer relations questionnaire
publisher Wichita State University
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2050
work_keys_str_mv AT hulseycassandra examiningthepsychometricpropertiesofselfreportmeasuresofbullyingreliabilityofthepeerrelationsquestionnaire
_version_ 1716666521793593344