The Democratic Kaleidoscope in the United States: Vanquishing Structural Racism in the U.S. Federal Government

This dissertation is broadly concerned with the relationship between democracy and race in the United States federal government. To analyze this problem, I rely on archival research from the 1967-8 National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (commonly known as the Kerner Commission, after chairp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ryan, Mary Kathleen
Other Authors: Political Science
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/88831
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-88831
record_format oai_dc
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Structural Racism
Democracy
Garrison State
Liberalism
Racism
White Supremacy
Settler Colonialism
Kerner Commission
National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders
Riots
Social Movements
Advocacy
Complicity
Police Brutality
spellingShingle Structural Racism
Democracy
Garrison State
Liberalism
Racism
White Supremacy
Settler Colonialism
Kerner Commission
National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders
Riots
Social Movements
Advocacy
Complicity
Police Brutality
Ryan, Mary Kathleen
The Democratic Kaleidoscope in the United States: Vanquishing Structural Racism in the U.S. Federal Government
description This dissertation is broadly concerned with the relationship between democracy and race in the United States federal government. To analyze this problem, I rely on archival research from the 1967-8 National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (commonly known as the Kerner Commission, after chairperson Governor Otto Kerner) to examine how the discussion and management of hundreds of so-called "race riots" in the summer of 1967 both challenges civil disobedience and embodies structural racism. Employing a content analysis of the final 425-page Kerner Commission government report, I assess the categorization, labeling, and language used to describe and document the hundreds of "race riots" and related state violence through acts of police misconduct that engulfed the country in the summer of 1967. I rely heavily on the report and background research itself, as well as major books related to race riots and presidential commissions, such as Anthony Platt's 1971 The Politics of Riot Commissions and Steven Gillon's 2018 Separate and Unequal. I incorporate theories of exit and the entitlement to rights advanced in literature by scholars like Jennet Kirkpatrick, James C. Scott, and Hannah Arendt. This dissertation is concerned with the relationship between morality and civic participation in democratic politics. I analyze Christopher Kutz's book Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age to delve into the ramifications of democracy and US citizenship being considered a kind of "collective project" and further contemplate what obligations and implications exist for citizens in US democracy against racial injustice. Since the Kerner Commission coincided with the rise of "law and order" politics in the nation's political vernacular, it represents a unique opportunity to witness an ideological shift toward a Garrison state and neoliberal ethos, both of which undermine the country's espoused democratic values, resting on the grammar of equality and justice for all. The Kerner Commission can provide valuable lessons in studies of political domination that remain pertinent to overcoming oppression and injustice today. === Doctor of Philosophy === This dissertation is broadly concerned with the relationship between democracy and race in the United States federal government. American democracy espouses moral virtues related to freedom and justice for all, and yet structural racism remains pervasive in how the government operates. To analyze this problem, I rely on archival research from the 1967-8 National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (commonly known as the Kerner Commission, after chairperson Governor Otto Kerner) to examine how the discussion and management of hundreds of so-called “race riots” in the summer of 1967 both challenges civil disobedience and embodies structural racism. I rely heavily on the report and background research itself to do a content analysis. I also use major books related to race riots and presidential commissions, such as Anthony Platt’s 1971 The Politics of Riot Commissions and Steven Gillon’s 2018 Separate and Unequal. Given that this dissertation is concerned with how morality shapes civic participation in democratic politics, I analyze Christopher Kutz’s book Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Since the Kerner Commission coincided with the rise of “law and order” politics in the nation’s political vernacular, it represents a unique opportunity to witness an ideological shift toward a Garrison state and neoliberal ethos, both of which undermine the country’s espoused democratic values, resting on the grammar of equality and justice for all. Individual advocates as well as scholars can learn valuable lessons from the Kerner Commission about oppression and injustice in today’s society.
author2 Political Science
author_facet Political Science
Ryan, Mary Kathleen
author Ryan, Mary Kathleen
author_sort Ryan, Mary Kathleen
title The Democratic Kaleidoscope in the United States: Vanquishing Structural Racism in the U.S. Federal Government
title_short The Democratic Kaleidoscope in the United States: Vanquishing Structural Racism in the U.S. Federal Government
title_full The Democratic Kaleidoscope in the United States: Vanquishing Structural Racism in the U.S. Federal Government
title_fullStr The Democratic Kaleidoscope in the United States: Vanquishing Structural Racism in the U.S. Federal Government
title_full_unstemmed The Democratic Kaleidoscope in the United States: Vanquishing Structural Racism in the U.S. Federal Government
title_sort democratic kaleidoscope in the united states: vanquishing structural racism in the u.s. federal government
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/88831
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanmarykathleen thedemocratickaleidoscopeintheunitedstatesvanquishingstructuralracismintheusfederalgovernment
AT ryanmarykathleen democratickaleidoscopeintheunitedstatesvanquishingstructuralracismintheusfederalgovernment
_version_ 1719344374244966400
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-888312020-09-29T05:35:55Z The Democratic Kaleidoscope in the United States: Vanquishing Structural Racism in the U.S. Federal Government Ryan, Mary Kathleen Political Science Brunsma, David L. Harrison, Anthony Kwame Moehler, Michael Caraccioli, Mauro J. Structural Racism Democracy Garrison State Liberalism Racism White Supremacy Settler Colonialism Kerner Commission National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders Riots Social Movements Advocacy Complicity Police Brutality This dissertation is broadly concerned with the relationship between democracy and race in the United States federal government. To analyze this problem, I rely on archival research from the 1967-8 National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (commonly known as the Kerner Commission, after chairperson Governor Otto Kerner) to examine how the discussion and management of hundreds of so-called "race riots" in the summer of 1967 both challenges civil disobedience and embodies structural racism. Employing a content analysis of the final 425-page Kerner Commission government report, I assess the categorization, labeling, and language used to describe and document the hundreds of "race riots" and related state violence through acts of police misconduct that engulfed the country in the summer of 1967. I rely heavily on the report and background research itself, as well as major books related to race riots and presidential commissions, such as Anthony Platt's 1971 The Politics of Riot Commissions and Steven Gillon's 2018 Separate and Unequal. I incorporate theories of exit and the entitlement to rights advanced in literature by scholars like Jennet Kirkpatrick, James C. Scott, and Hannah Arendt. This dissertation is concerned with the relationship between morality and civic participation in democratic politics. I analyze Christopher Kutz's book Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age to delve into the ramifications of democracy and US citizenship being considered a kind of "collective project" and further contemplate what obligations and implications exist for citizens in US democracy against racial injustice. Since the Kerner Commission coincided with the rise of "law and order" politics in the nation's political vernacular, it represents a unique opportunity to witness an ideological shift toward a Garrison state and neoliberal ethos, both of which undermine the country's espoused democratic values, resting on the grammar of equality and justice for all. The Kerner Commission can provide valuable lessons in studies of political domination that remain pertinent to overcoming oppression and injustice today. Doctor of Philosophy This dissertation is broadly concerned with the relationship between democracy and race in the United States federal government. American democracy espouses moral virtues related to freedom and justice for all, and yet structural racism remains pervasive in how the government operates. To analyze this problem, I rely on archival research from the 1967-8 National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (commonly known as the Kerner Commission, after chairperson Governor Otto Kerner) to examine how the discussion and management of hundreds of so-called “race riots” in the summer of 1967 both challenges civil disobedience and embodies structural racism. I rely heavily on the report and background research itself to do a content analysis. I also use major books related to race riots and presidential commissions, such as Anthony Platt’s 1971 The Politics of Riot Commissions and Steven Gillon’s 2018 Separate and Unequal. Given that this dissertation is concerned with how morality shapes civic participation in democratic politics, I analyze Christopher Kutz’s book Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Since the Kerner Commission coincided with the rise of “law and order” politics in the nation’s political vernacular, it represents a unique opportunity to witness an ideological shift toward a Garrison state and neoliberal ethos, both of which undermine the country’s espoused democratic values, resting on the grammar of equality and justice for all. Individual advocates as well as scholars can learn valuable lessons from the Kerner Commission about oppression and injustice in today’s society. 2019-04-05T08:00:27Z 2019-04-05T08:00:27Z 2019-04-04 Dissertation vt_gsexam:19227 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/88831 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ ETD application/pdf Virginia Tech