The effect of forward slip on the surface finish of cold rolled aluminum

Forward slip (FS), the percent difference between the roll velocity and the strip exit velocity, was achieved by altering four variables: reduction, rolling speed, lubricant viscosity, and roll roughness. A two-high laboratory mill was used to roll strips of unalloyed, H-18 temper aluminum. An SEM a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Domermuth, David Henry
Other Authors: Mechanical Engineering
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/87104
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-87104
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-871042020-09-26T05:36:10Z The effect of forward slip on the surface finish of cold rolled aluminum Domermuth, David Henry Mechanical Engineering LD5655.V855 1982.D653 Aluminum forming Aluminum -- Metallurgy Rolling (Metal-work) Forward slip (FS), the percent difference between the roll velocity and the strip exit velocity, was achieved by altering four variables: reduction, rolling speed, lubricant viscosity, and roll roughness. A two-high laboratory mill was used to roll strips of unalloyed, H-18 temper aluminum. An SEM and a Leitze Orthoplane microscope were used to examine the strip surface. A grainy pattern, which varied with the rolling condition, was observed on the sample surface. The grainy pattern resulted from three effects: grooves imprinted by the rolls, black spots identified as hydropitting (HP), and horseshoe shaped marks which were attributed to FS. These effects were studied and the following conclusions drawn. Higher viscosity, high speed, and rough rolls produced more HP. Increasing reduction produced HP with the viscous lubricant, oil, but less HP with kerosene. No HP was observed at 59 percent reduction but FS marks occurred and were more prevalent with oil than kerosene. The smooth rolls produced more FS marks than the rough rolls. Two postulates were presented to explain the pattern of these effects. First, the FS mark lengths were of the same order of magnitude as one set of theoretically calculated relative slip lengths; indicating that FS was responsible for the marks. Second, the absence of HP and presence of FS marks, in particular cases, indicated that a hydraulic effect was responsible for the FS marks. The FS marks would have been created as localized high pressure lubricant flowed across the surface to equalize the film pressure. Master of Science 2019-01-31T17:50:23Z 2019-01-31T17:50:23Z 1982 Thesis Text http://hdl.handle.net/10919/87104 en_US OCLC# 9617511 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ vi, 41, [2] leaves application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V855 1982.D653
Aluminum forming
Aluminum -- Metallurgy
Rolling (Metal-work)
spellingShingle LD5655.V855 1982.D653
Aluminum forming
Aluminum -- Metallurgy
Rolling (Metal-work)
Domermuth, David Henry
The effect of forward slip on the surface finish of cold rolled aluminum
description Forward slip (FS), the percent difference between the roll velocity and the strip exit velocity, was achieved by altering four variables: reduction, rolling speed, lubricant viscosity, and roll roughness. A two-high laboratory mill was used to roll strips of unalloyed, H-18 temper aluminum. An SEM and a Leitze Orthoplane microscope were used to examine the strip surface. A grainy pattern, which varied with the rolling condition, was observed on the sample surface. The grainy pattern resulted from three effects: grooves imprinted by the rolls, black spots identified as hydropitting (HP), and horseshoe shaped marks which were attributed to FS. These effects were studied and the following conclusions drawn. Higher viscosity, high speed, and rough rolls produced more HP. Increasing reduction produced HP with the viscous lubricant, oil, but less HP with kerosene. No HP was observed at 59 percent reduction but FS marks occurred and were more prevalent with oil than kerosene. The smooth rolls produced more FS marks than the rough rolls. Two postulates were presented to explain the pattern of these effects. First, the FS mark lengths were of the same order of magnitude as one set of theoretically calculated relative slip lengths; indicating that FS was responsible for the marks. Second, the absence of HP and presence of FS marks, in particular cases, indicated that a hydraulic effect was responsible for the FS marks. The FS marks would have been created as localized high pressure lubricant flowed across the surface to equalize the film pressure. === Master of Science
author2 Mechanical Engineering
author_facet Mechanical Engineering
Domermuth, David Henry
author Domermuth, David Henry
author_sort Domermuth, David Henry
title The effect of forward slip on the surface finish of cold rolled aluminum
title_short The effect of forward slip on the surface finish of cold rolled aluminum
title_full The effect of forward slip on the surface finish of cold rolled aluminum
title_fullStr The effect of forward slip on the surface finish of cold rolled aluminum
title_full_unstemmed The effect of forward slip on the surface finish of cold rolled aluminum
title_sort effect of forward slip on the surface finish of cold rolled aluminum
publisher Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/87104
work_keys_str_mv AT domermuthdavidhenry theeffectofforwardsliponthesurfacefinishofcoldrolledaluminum
AT domermuthdavidhenry effectofforwardsliponthesurfacefinishofcoldrolledaluminum
_version_ 1719342089484894208