Soil Carbon and Nutrient Cycling Across Cover Types in Southern Appalachian Hardwood Forests

Appalachian mixed hardwood stands along south facing slopes of the Ridge and Valley physiographic province were used to determine fine scale soil respiration (Rs ) and nutrient dynamics among four distinct cover types, white oak (WO, Quercus alba L.), scarlet oak (SO, Quercus coccinea Muech.), chest...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bilal, Ruba Candiga
Other Authors: Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/85625
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-85625
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-856252021-11-17T05:37:42Z Soil Carbon and Nutrient Cycling Across Cover Types in Southern Appalachian Hardwood Forests Bilal, Ruba Candiga Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation Seiler, John R. Strahm, Brian D. Fox, Thomas R. Schoenholtz, Stephen H. soil water decomposition Appalachian mixed hardwood stands along south facing slopes of the Ridge and Valley physiographic province were used to determine fine scale soil respiration (Rs ) and nutrient dynamics among four distinct cover types, white oak (WO, Quercus alba L.), scarlet oak (SO, Quercus coccinea Muech.), chestnut oak (CO, Quercus montana Wild.) and a pine-oak co-dominant cover (PO, Pinus spp. and Quercus spp. (primarily Pinus pungens Lamb. and Q. montana)). Null hypotheses were that: (1) Rs and its relationship to environmental drivers would not differ among the cover types, (2) water and nutrient use efficiencies (WUE and NUE) would not differ among the cover types, and (3) litter decomposition would not differ among the diverse cover types. In 0.02 ha plots, replicated four times, Rs and associated variables (e.g., soil temperature and moisture) were measured. Measurements occurred in three sub-sample locations per plot, from July 2014 - December 2015. In each plot, foliage from two trees of the dominant species were collected to determine WUE using δ¹³C isotope discrimination. Nutrient (N, P and K) content of this fresh foliage was compared with that of litterfall to determine NUE. Litterbags, collected over a one and half year period were used to determine decomposition rate constants for each dominant species. Soil temperature and moisture explained 71% of the variability in Rs. Although only slight, there were statistically significant differences in the Rs models due to cover type. At the same soil temperature, the PO cover type had the highest Rs while the SO, WO cover types had the lowest Rs. WUE, and NUE varied among cover types. SO had significantly greater WUE than the other species, including Table mountain pine, which had the highest NUE. Higher elevation cover types (i.e., PO and CO) ad greater decomposition rate constants. Among the factors driving decomposition, soil C: N ratio had the strongest correlation to decomposition. Correlations between decomposition and productivity variables of total above ground biomass, total stand biomass, and aboveground net primary production also exist. In conclusion, carbon and nutrient cycling varies across the level of cover type within the southern Appalachian hardwood forests. Future efforts to focus on carbon and nutrient dynamics in the context of land use or global change should consider these finer-scale differences. Ph. D. 2018-11-02T06:00:32Z 2018-11-02T06:00:32Z 2017-05-10 Dissertation vt_gsexam:10803 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/85625 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ ETD application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic soil
water
decomposition
spellingShingle soil
water
decomposition
Bilal, Ruba Candiga
Soil Carbon and Nutrient Cycling Across Cover Types in Southern Appalachian Hardwood Forests
description Appalachian mixed hardwood stands along south facing slopes of the Ridge and Valley physiographic province were used to determine fine scale soil respiration (Rs ) and nutrient dynamics among four distinct cover types, white oak (WO, Quercus alba L.), scarlet oak (SO, Quercus coccinea Muech.), chestnut oak (CO, Quercus montana Wild.) and a pine-oak co-dominant cover (PO, Pinus spp. and Quercus spp. (primarily Pinus pungens Lamb. and Q. montana)). Null hypotheses were that: (1) Rs and its relationship to environmental drivers would not differ among the cover types, (2) water and nutrient use efficiencies (WUE and NUE) would not differ among the cover types, and (3) litter decomposition would not differ among the diverse cover types. In 0.02 ha plots, replicated four times, Rs and associated variables (e.g., soil temperature and moisture) were measured. Measurements occurred in three sub-sample locations per plot, from July 2014 - December 2015. In each plot, foliage from two trees of the dominant species were collected to determine WUE using δ¹³C isotope discrimination. Nutrient (N, P and K) content of this fresh foliage was compared with that of litterfall to determine NUE. Litterbags, collected over a one and half year period were used to determine decomposition rate constants for each dominant species. Soil temperature and moisture explained 71% of the variability in Rs. Although only slight, there were statistically significant differences in the Rs models due to cover type. At the same soil temperature, the PO cover type had the highest Rs while the SO, WO cover types had the lowest Rs. WUE, and NUE varied among cover types. SO had significantly greater WUE than the other species, including Table mountain pine, which had the highest NUE. Higher elevation cover types (i.e., PO and CO) ad greater decomposition rate constants. Among the factors driving decomposition, soil C: N ratio had the strongest correlation to decomposition. Correlations between decomposition and productivity variables of total above ground biomass, total stand biomass, and aboveground net primary production also exist. In conclusion, carbon and nutrient cycling varies across the level of cover type within the southern Appalachian hardwood forests. Future efforts to focus on carbon and nutrient dynamics in the context of land use or global change should consider these finer-scale differences. === Ph. D.
author2 Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation
author_facet Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation
Bilal, Ruba Candiga
author Bilal, Ruba Candiga
author_sort Bilal, Ruba Candiga
title Soil Carbon and Nutrient Cycling Across Cover Types in Southern Appalachian Hardwood Forests
title_short Soil Carbon and Nutrient Cycling Across Cover Types in Southern Appalachian Hardwood Forests
title_full Soil Carbon and Nutrient Cycling Across Cover Types in Southern Appalachian Hardwood Forests
title_fullStr Soil Carbon and Nutrient Cycling Across Cover Types in Southern Appalachian Hardwood Forests
title_full_unstemmed Soil Carbon and Nutrient Cycling Across Cover Types in Southern Appalachian Hardwood Forests
title_sort soil carbon and nutrient cycling across cover types in southern appalachian hardwood forests
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/85625
work_keys_str_mv AT bilalrubacandiga soilcarbonandnutrientcyclingacrosscovertypesinsouthernappalachianhardwoodforests
_version_ 1719494235097399296