Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries

Blue Catfish Ictalurus furcatus are native to tributaries of the Mississippi River but are now invasive in several Atlantic slope drainages. This includes subestuaries of the Chesapeake Bay, where their feeding ecology and potential impact on native species was largely unknown. We collected stomach...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schmitt, Joseph Daniel
Other Authors: Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/83464
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-83464
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-834642020-09-29T05:34:59Z Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries Schmitt, Joseph Daniel Fish and Wildlife Conservation Orth, Donald J. Peoples, Brandon Kevin Jiao, Yan Castello, Leandro invasion ecology food habits diet blue catfish flathead catfish consumption rates daily ration prey selectivity diet breadth trophic position omnivory index Blue Catfish Ictalurus furcatus are native to tributaries of the Mississippi River but are now invasive in several Atlantic slope drainages. This includes subestuaries of the Chesapeake Bay, where their feeding ecology and potential impact on native species was largely unknown. We collected stomach contents from 16,110 Blue Catfish at 698 sites in three large subestuaries of the Chesapeake Bay (James, York, Rappahannock rivers). Cumulative prey curves revealed that sample size was sufficient for diet description, though 1,000 – 1500 stomachs were needed per river. Blue Catfish are opportunistic generalists that feed on a broad array of plant and animal material. Logistic regression models reveal that Blue Catfish undergo significant ontogenetic diet shifts to piscivory at larger sizes (P<0.01) though the lengths at which these shifts occur varies by river system (500 – 900 mm total length; TL). Over 60% of Blue Catfish stomachs contained other invasive species, primarily Hydrilla verticillata and Asian clams Corbicula fluminea. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) revealed that salinity and season explained the most variation in Blue Catfish diet, while Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) demonstrated that there is considerable spatiotemporal and length-based variation in predation of species of concern. Species of concern include American Shad, American Eel, and river herring, which are imperiled, and blue crab, which support valuable fisheries in Chesapeake Bay. Predation of American Shad, American Eel, and river herring was rare (max predicted occurrence in Blue Catfish diets = 8%), while blue crab was much more common in the diet (max predicted occurrence =28%). Predation of American Shad and river herring peaks in freshwater areas in April, while predation of blue crab peaks in brackish areas in October. Predation of all species of concern is highest for large catfish (500 – 1000 mm TL). Field and laboratory-based estimates of consumption rate revealed that Blue Catfish feed at similar rates as Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus, and daily ration is estimated to be 2-5% bodyweight per day during warm temperatures, while peak feeding (maximum daily ration) can approach 10% bodyweight per day. While consumption of imperiled species is rare, Blue Catfish could still have negative impacts on these species due to dense catfish populations. Ph. D. 2018-06-06T08:01:23Z 2018-06-06T08:01:23Z 2018-06-05 Dissertation vt_gsexam:14753 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/83464 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ ETD application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic invasion ecology
food habits
diet
blue catfish
flathead catfish
consumption rates
daily ration
prey selectivity
diet breadth
trophic position
omnivory index
spellingShingle invasion ecology
food habits
diet
blue catfish
flathead catfish
consumption rates
daily ration
prey selectivity
diet breadth
trophic position
omnivory index
Schmitt, Joseph Daniel
Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries
description Blue Catfish Ictalurus furcatus are native to tributaries of the Mississippi River but are now invasive in several Atlantic slope drainages. This includes subestuaries of the Chesapeake Bay, where their feeding ecology and potential impact on native species was largely unknown. We collected stomach contents from 16,110 Blue Catfish at 698 sites in three large subestuaries of the Chesapeake Bay (James, York, Rappahannock rivers). Cumulative prey curves revealed that sample size was sufficient for diet description, though 1,000 – 1500 stomachs were needed per river. Blue Catfish are opportunistic generalists that feed on a broad array of plant and animal material. Logistic regression models reveal that Blue Catfish undergo significant ontogenetic diet shifts to piscivory at larger sizes (P<0.01) though the lengths at which these shifts occur varies by river system (500 – 900 mm total length; TL). Over 60% of Blue Catfish stomachs contained other invasive species, primarily Hydrilla verticillata and Asian clams Corbicula fluminea. Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) revealed that salinity and season explained the most variation in Blue Catfish diet, while Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) demonstrated that there is considerable spatiotemporal and length-based variation in predation of species of concern. Species of concern include American Shad, American Eel, and river herring, which are imperiled, and blue crab, which support valuable fisheries in Chesapeake Bay. Predation of American Shad, American Eel, and river herring was rare (max predicted occurrence in Blue Catfish diets = 8%), while blue crab was much more common in the diet (max predicted occurrence =28%). Predation of American Shad and river herring peaks in freshwater areas in April, while predation of blue crab peaks in brackish areas in October. Predation of all species of concern is highest for large catfish (500 – 1000 mm TL). Field and laboratory-based estimates of consumption rate revealed that Blue Catfish feed at similar rates as Channel Catfish Ictalurus punctatus, and daily ration is estimated to be 2-5% bodyweight per day during warm temperatures, while peak feeding (maximum daily ration) can approach 10% bodyweight per day. While consumption of imperiled species is rare, Blue Catfish could still have negative impacts on these species due to dense catfish populations. === Ph. D.
author2 Fish and Wildlife Conservation
author_facet Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Schmitt, Joseph Daniel
author Schmitt, Joseph Daniel
author_sort Schmitt, Joseph Daniel
title Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries
title_short Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries
title_full Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries
title_fullStr Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries
title_full_unstemmed Feeding Ecology of Invasive Catfishes in Chesapeake Bay Subestuaries
title_sort feeding ecology of invasive catfishes in chesapeake bay subestuaries
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/83464
work_keys_str_mv AT schmittjosephdaniel feedingecologyofinvasivecatfishesinchesapeakebaysubestuaries
_version_ 1719343977862266880