Oxidation barrier and light protective packaging properties for controlling light induced oxidation in milk

Fluorescent light exposure has well documented negative effects on fluid milk through oxidation reactions. A shift to light-emitting diode (LED) lights in retail dairy cases has occurred due to increased energy efficiency, but the effects of LED light on fluid milk are not known. The objective was t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Potts, Hayley Lynn
Other Authors: Food Science and Technology
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/80441
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-80441
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-804412020-09-29T05:43:33Z Oxidation barrier and light protective packaging properties for controlling light induced oxidation in milk Potts, Hayley Lynn Food Science and Technology Duncan, Susan E. O'Keefe, Sean F. Marcy, Joseph E. milk oxidation sensory evaluation packaging oxygen Fluorescent light exposure has well documented negative effects on fluid milk through oxidation reactions. A shift to light-emitting diode (LED) lights in retail dairy cases has occurred due to increased energy efficiency, but the effects of LED light on fluid milk are not known. The objective was to study the interaction of light protective additives (LPA) with a high oxygen barrier package under fluorescent and LED lighting conditions simulating a retail refrigerated dairy case. The extent of oxidation in 2% milk packaged in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) packages with different light interference properties (UV barrier, 2.1% titanium dioxide (TiO2) LPA, 4.0% TiO2 LPA, 6.6% TiO2 LPA) under light exposure up to 72h was compared to control packages (light-exposed, light-protected). Chemical measures of oxidation included dissolved oxygen content, formation of secondary lipid oxidation products, riboflavin degradation, and volatile analysis by electronic nose. Changes in dissolved oxygen content were associated closely with oxidation changes in milk over 72h. PET with 6.6% TiO2 was the most successful package, based on triangle test methodology, protecting milk sensory quality similar to light-protected milk through 8h LED light exposure. Based on a 9-point hedonic scale, (1=dislike extremely, 9=like extremely), consumers liked milk stored under LED light more (α=0.05; 6.59 ± 1.60) than milk stored under fluorescent light (5.87 ± 1.93). LED light is less detrimental to milk quality than fluorescent light and PET with high levels of TiO2 can protect milk quality for short periods of time under typical retail storage conditions. Master of Science in Life Sciences 2017-11-19T07:00:18Z 2017-11-19T07:00:18Z 2016-05-27 Thesis vt_gsexam:7594 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/80441 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ ETD application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic milk
oxidation
sensory evaluation
packaging
oxygen
spellingShingle milk
oxidation
sensory evaluation
packaging
oxygen
Potts, Hayley Lynn
Oxidation barrier and light protective packaging properties for controlling light induced oxidation in milk
description Fluorescent light exposure has well documented negative effects on fluid milk through oxidation reactions. A shift to light-emitting diode (LED) lights in retail dairy cases has occurred due to increased energy efficiency, but the effects of LED light on fluid milk are not known. The objective was to study the interaction of light protective additives (LPA) with a high oxygen barrier package under fluorescent and LED lighting conditions simulating a retail refrigerated dairy case. The extent of oxidation in 2% milk packaged in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) packages with different light interference properties (UV barrier, 2.1% titanium dioxide (TiO2) LPA, 4.0% TiO2 LPA, 6.6% TiO2 LPA) under light exposure up to 72h was compared to control packages (light-exposed, light-protected). Chemical measures of oxidation included dissolved oxygen content, formation of secondary lipid oxidation products, riboflavin degradation, and volatile analysis by electronic nose. Changes in dissolved oxygen content were associated closely with oxidation changes in milk over 72h. PET with 6.6% TiO2 was the most successful package, based on triangle test methodology, protecting milk sensory quality similar to light-protected milk through 8h LED light exposure. Based on a 9-point hedonic scale, (1=dislike extremely, 9=like extremely), consumers liked milk stored under LED light more (α=0.05; 6.59 ± 1.60) than milk stored under fluorescent light (5.87 ± 1.93). LED light is less detrimental to milk quality than fluorescent light and PET with high levels of TiO2 can protect milk quality for short periods of time under typical retail storage conditions. === Master of Science in Life Sciences
author2 Food Science and Technology
author_facet Food Science and Technology
Potts, Hayley Lynn
author Potts, Hayley Lynn
author_sort Potts, Hayley Lynn
title Oxidation barrier and light protective packaging properties for controlling light induced oxidation in milk
title_short Oxidation barrier and light protective packaging properties for controlling light induced oxidation in milk
title_full Oxidation barrier and light protective packaging properties for controlling light induced oxidation in milk
title_fullStr Oxidation barrier and light protective packaging properties for controlling light induced oxidation in milk
title_full_unstemmed Oxidation barrier and light protective packaging properties for controlling light induced oxidation in milk
title_sort oxidation barrier and light protective packaging properties for controlling light induced oxidation in milk
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/80441
work_keys_str_mv AT pottshayleylynn oxidationbarrierandlightprotectivepackagingpropertiesforcontrollinglightinducedoxidationinmilk
_version_ 1719345887318114304