Economic impacts of extension integrated pest management programs in the United States

Integrated pest management (IPM) is an approach to pest control which emphasizes the Integration of biological, cultural, and chemical control methods for optimal pest management. The purpose of this thesis is to empirically examine the level and distribution of net economic benefits of Extension IP...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Napit, Krishna Bahadur
Other Authors: Agricultural Economics
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/74524
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-74524
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-745242020-09-29T05:46:20Z Economic impacts of extension integrated pest management programs in the United States Napit, Krishna Bahadur Agricultural Economics LD5655.V855 1986.N365 Pests -- Integrated control -- United States Pests -- Integrated control -- Economic aspects Integrated pest management (IPM) is an approach to pest control which emphasizes the Integration of biological, cultural, and chemical control methods for optimal pest management. The purpose of this thesis is to empirically examine the level and distribution of net economic benefits of Extension IPM, and to assess the relative importance of socioeconomic factors in affecting the adoption of IPM in the states of Indiana, Virginia, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, Texas, Massachusetts, Mississippi and the Northwest region. Budgeting and hypothesis testing procedures are used to conduct a net returns analysis. Consumer-producer surplus analysis is used to assess IPM benefits to producers and consumers. Finally, a polychotomous logit model is used to assess the importance of socioeconomic factors affecting IPM adoption. The results of these analyses show significantly higher returns and less variability of returns per acre for users of IPM as compared to non-users. Moreover, consumers receive significant positive economic gains. However, pesticide cost and the variance of pesticide cost per acre increase with increasing levels of IPM use in several states but decrease in a few others. Gross farm income, percent family income from farming, frequency of contacts with Extension agents, and the education level of respondents are the most important factors related to adoption of IPM. A typical user of IPM is white, male, with at least some college education, has frequent contacts with Extension agents, has a relatively large farm, higher gross farm income, and a higher percent family income from farming. Master of Science 2017-01-30T21:02:48Z 2017-01-30T21:02:48Z 1986 Thesis Text http://hdl.handle.net/10919/74524 en_US OCLC# 15514393 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ x, 140 leaves application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V855 1986.N365
Pests -- Integrated control -- United States
Pests -- Integrated control -- Economic aspects
spellingShingle LD5655.V855 1986.N365
Pests -- Integrated control -- United States
Pests -- Integrated control -- Economic aspects
Napit, Krishna Bahadur
Economic impacts of extension integrated pest management programs in the United States
description Integrated pest management (IPM) is an approach to pest control which emphasizes the Integration of biological, cultural, and chemical control methods for optimal pest management. The purpose of this thesis is to empirically examine the level and distribution of net economic benefits of Extension IPM, and to assess the relative importance of socioeconomic factors in affecting the adoption of IPM in the states of Indiana, Virginia, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, Texas, Massachusetts, Mississippi and the Northwest region. Budgeting and hypothesis testing procedures are used to conduct a net returns analysis. Consumer-producer surplus analysis is used to assess IPM benefits to producers and consumers. Finally, a polychotomous logit model is used to assess the importance of socioeconomic factors affecting IPM adoption. The results of these analyses show significantly higher returns and less variability of returns per acre for users of IPM as compared to non-users. Moreover, consumers receive significant positive economic gains. However, pesticide cost and the variance of pesticide cost per acre increase with increasing levels of IPM use in several states but decrease in a few others. Gross farm income, percent family income from farming, frequency of contacts with Extension agents, and the education level of respondents are the most important factors related to adoption of IPM. A typical user of IPM is white, male, with at least some college education, has frequent contacts with Extension agents, has a relatively large farm, higher gross farm income, and a higher percent family income from farming. === Master of Science
author2 Agricultural Economics
author_facet Agricultural Economics
Napit, Krishna Bahadur
author Napit, Krishna Bahadur
author_sort Napit, Krishna Bahadur
title Economic impacts of extension integrated pest management programs in the United States
title_short Economic impacts of extension integrated pest management programs in the United States
title_full Economic impacts of extension integrated pest management programs in the United States
title_fullStr Economic impacts of extension integrated pest management programs in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Economic impacts of extension integrated pest management programs in the United States
title_sort economic impacts of extension integrated pest management programs in the united states
publisher Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/74524
work_keys_str_mv AT napitkrishnabahadur economicimpactsofextensionintegratedpestmanagementprogramsintheunitedstates
_version_ 1719346242760212480