Variation in labor efficiency and selected costs among Virginia meat packing firms

Costs and production records from six 1/ Virginia meat packers and processors were analyzed by departments to obtain the interfirm variation in man-hours required and in the costs of labor and selected resources. In addition, four firms that were unable to supply departmental data supplied total pl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crowder, Richard Thomas
Other Authors: Agricultural Economics
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Virginia Polytechnic Institute 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/64086
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-64086
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-640862020-12-22T05:44:57Z Variation in labor efficiency and selected costs among Virginia meat packing firms Crowder, Richard Thomas Agricultural Economics LD5655.V855 1961.C75 Meat industry and trade -- Costs Meat industry and trade -- Virginia Costs and production records from six 1/ Virginia meat packers and processors were analyzed by departments to obtain the interfirm variation in man-hours required and in the costs of labor and selected resources. In addition, four firms that were unable to supply departmental data supplied total plant labor records and selected other costs. These four firms were combined with the other six and analyzed for interfirm variation of the selected resources for the total operation. The total analysis included the following costs in addition to labor efficiency: labor, supply, maintenance, office, insurance, sales, depreciation, rent, and utility. Graphic analysis was used to investigate relationships between volume and labor efficiency and volume and costs. The standard deviation and coefficient of variation were calculated to measure the variation that existed among firms. Considerable interfirm and interdepartmental variation was found. In most instances the coefficient of variation exceeded 30. In the departmental analysis there was a relationship between volume and labor efficiency only in calf kill and fabricating. There was no meaningful relationship between volume and costs in the departmental analysis. In the total analysis there was neither a meaningful relationship between volume and labor efficiency nor volume and costs. All firms were inefficient in some areas of operation. The norms and measures of variation as discovered should prove to be valuable management tools when used with individual plant records to delineate problem areas within a firm. Master of Science 2015-11-13T20:44:33Z 2015-11-13T20:44:33Z 1961 Thesis Text http://hdl.handle.net/10919/64086 en_US OCLC# 20050755 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ 58, [2] leaves application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Polytechnic Institute
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V855 1961.C75
Meat industry and trade -- Costs
Meat industry and trade -- Virginia
spellingShingle LD5655.V855 1961.C75
Meat industry and trade -- Costs
Meat industry and trade -- Virginia
Crowder, Richard Thomas
Variation in labor efficiency and selected costs among Virginia meat packing firms
description Costs and production records from six 1/ Virginia meat packers and processors were analyzed by departments to obtain the interfirm variation in man-hours required and in the costs of labor and selected resources. In addition, four firms that were unable to supply departmental data supplied total plant labor records and selected other costs. These four firms were combined with the other six and analyzed for interfirm variation of the selected resources for the total operation. The total analysis included the following costs in addition to labor efficiency: labor, supply, maintenance, office, insurance, sales, depreciation, rent, and utility. Graphic analysis was used to investigate relationships between volume and labor efficiency and volume and costs. The standard deviation and coefficient of variation were calculated to measure the variation that existed among firms. Considerable interfirm and interdepartmental variation was found. In most instances the coefficient of variation exceeded 30. In the departmental analysis there was a relationship between volume and labor efficiency only in calf kill and fabricating. There was no meaningful relationship between volume and costs in the departmental analysis. In the total analysis there was neither a meaningful relationship between volume and labor efficiency nor volume and costs. All firms were inefficient in some areas of operation. The norms and measures of variation as discovered should prove to be valuable management tools when used with individual plant records to delineate problem areas within a firm. === Master of Science
author2 Agricultural Economics
author_facet Agricultural Economics
Crowder, Richard Thomas
author Crowder, Richard Thomas
author_sort Crowder, Richard Thomas
title Variation in labor efficiency and selected costs among Virginia meat packing firms
title_short Variation in labor efficiency and selected costs among Virginia meat packing firms
title_full Variation in labor efficiency and selected costs among Virginia meat packing firms
title_fullStr Variation in labor efficiency and selected costs among Virginia meat packing firms
title_full_unstemmed Variation in labor efficiency and selected costs among Virginia meat packing firms
title_sort variation in labor efficiency and selected costs among virginia meat packing firms
publisher Virginia Polytechnic Institute
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/64086
work_keys_str_mv AT crowderrichardthomas variationinlaborefficiencyandselectedcostsamongvirginiameatpackingfirms
_version_ 1719371392023003136