Investigating Differences in Douglas-fir and Southern Yellow Pine Bonding Properties

Differences in southern yellow pine (represented by Pinus taeda) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) mature and juvenile wood were examined in terms of density, chemical composition, surface energy, shear stress, % wood failure, and delamination. Density was measured using a QTRS density scanner...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mirabile, Kyle Vincent
Other Authors: Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/56970
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-56970
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-569702020-10-24T05:32:41Z Investigating Differences in Douglas-fir and Southern Yellow Pine Bonding Properties Mirabile, Kyle Vincent Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation Zink-Sharp, Audrey G. Renneckar, Scott Harold Frazier, Charles E. Delamination Surface Energy Shear Stress Chemical Composition Density Differences in southern yellow pine (represented by Pinus taeda) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) mature and juvenile wood were examined in terms of density, chemical composition, surface energy, shear stress, % wood failure, and delamination. Density was measured using a QTRS density scanner. Loblolly pine contained a higher average density. Chemical composition was measured using the NREL standard for identifying the chemical composition of biomass. Southern yellow pine contained a higher % hemicellulose, lignin, and extractives. Douglas-fir had higher % cellulose than southern yellow pine. Surface energy was measured using the static sessile drop contact angle method and the acid/base approach. Southern yellow pine contained a lower average contact angle than Douglas-fir. Shear stress, % wood failure, and durability were measured using ASTM-D2559 with two adhesives, a one-part moisture cure polyurethane (PU), and a two-part ambient curing phenol-resorcinol-formaldehyde (PRF). Shear stress for southern yellow pine was affected the most by the type of growth regions at the bond (juvenile to mature wood) and the assembly times of the adhesives used. Douglas-fir shear stress was affected by the type of adhesive and the growth region at the bond. Delamination results demonstrated that when using PRF the southern yellow pine has less delamination statistically than Douglas-fir. Also, the growth region at the bond with both adhesives showed to impact delamination with juvenile to mature wood having less delamination than mature to mature wood. Master of Science 2015-10-23T08:00:30Z 2015-10-23T08:00:30Z 2015-10-22 Thesis vt_gsexam:6460 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/56970 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ ETD application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Delamination
Surface Energy
Shear Stress
Chemical Composition
Density
spellingShingle Delamination
Surface Energy
Shear Stress
Chemical Composition
Density
Mirabile, Kyle Vincent
Investigating Differences in Douglas-fir and Southern Yellow Pine Bonding Properties
description Differences in southern yellow pine (represented by Pinus taeda) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) mature and juvenile wood were examined in terms of density, chemical composition, surface energy, shear stress, % wood failure, and delamination. Density was measured using a QTRS density scanner. Loblolly pine contained a higher average density. Chemical composition was measured using the NREL standard for identifying the chemical composition of biomass. Southern yellow pine contained a higher % hemicellulose, lignin, and extractives. Douglas-fir had higher % cellulose than southern yellow pine. Surface energy was measured using the static sessile drop contact angle method and the acid/base approach. Southern yellow pine contained a lower average contact angle than Douglas-fir. Shear stress, % wood failure, and durability were measured using ASTM-D2559 with two adhesives, a one-part moisture cure polyurethane (PU), and a two-part ambient curing phenol-resorcinol-formaldehyde (PRF). Shear stress for southern yellow pine was affected the most by the type of growth regions at the bond (juvenile to mature wood) and the assembly times of the adhesives used. Douglas-fir shear stress was affected by the type of adhesive and the growth region at the bond. Delamination results demonstrated that when using PRF the southern yellow pine has less delamination statistically than Douglas-fir. Also, the growth region at the bond with both adhesives showed to impact delamination with juvenile to mature wood having less delamination than mature to mature wood. === Master of Science
author2 Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation
author_facet Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation
Mirabile, Kyle Vincent
author Mirabile, Kyle Vincent
author_sort Mirabile, Kyle Vincent
title Investigating Differences in Douglas-fir and Southern Yellow Pine Bonding Properties
title_short Investigating Differences in Douglas-fir and Southern Yellow Pine Bonding Properties
title_full Investigating Differences in Douglas-fir and Southern Yellow Pine Bonding Properties
title_fullStr Investigating Differences in Douglas-fir and Southern Yellow Pine Bonding Properties
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Differences in Douglas-fir and Southern Yellow Pine Bonding Properties
title_sort investigating differences in douglas-fir and southern yellow pine bonding properties
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/56970
work_keys_str_mv AT mirabilekylevincent investigatingdifferencesindouglasfirandsouthernyellowpinebondingproperties
_version_ 1719353218811559936